Advertisement

A Learning Method for Automated Disassembly

  • Julius WolffEmail author
  • Torge Kolditz
  • Annika Raatz
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 530)

Abstract

While joining tolerances, and therefore forces, are known in the assembly process, the determination of disassembly forces is not possible. This is caused by changes in the product properties during the product operation, which has multiple reasons such as thermal or mechanical stress on the product. Regarding the planning of disassembly tasks, disassembly times and tools cannot be planned properly. They have to be determined in the process or stay undefined, which can result in damaging of the product.

This article shows an approach to describe the necessary disassembly forces without having to investigate the complex physical influences caused by the usage of the product. To do so, a Learning Method is developed, which is sustained by a Lookup-Table for the estimation of disassembly forces based on basic input data such as hours of operation and operating characteristics. Missing values will be interpolated by using multiple linear regression. The concept will be illustrated in the example of a turbine blade connection.

Keywords

Disassembly Automation Planning Turbine blades 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors kindly thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for the financial support to accomplish the research project A5 “Adaptable and Component-Protecting Disassembly in the Regeneration Path” within the Collaborative Research Center (CRC) 871 - Regeneration of Complex Capital Goods.

References

  1. 1.
    Selinger, G.: Sustainability in Manufacturing – Recovery of Resources in Product and Material Cycles, pp. 217–311. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49871-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kahmeyer, M.: Flexible Demontage mit dem Industrieroboter am Beispiel von Fernsprech-Endgeräten, pp. 50–60. Springer, Stuttgart (1995).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-47876-5. Faculty of Engineering Design and Production EngineeringCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahgary, A.: Eine Analyse der Verschleißmechanismen in der Anwendung der Hüftgelenkendoprothetik unter realistischen Randbedingungen. diplom.de, Berlin (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lufthansa Technik Hamburg: Visiting the disassembly department in March 2014Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Toutenberg, H., Schomaker, M., Wißmann, M.: Arbeitsbuch zur deskriptiven und induktiven Statistik, pp. 227–239. Springer, Berlin (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32142-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wolff, J., Yan, M., Schultz, M., Raatz, A.: Reduction of diassembly forces for detaching components with solidified assembly connections. In: 6th CIRP Conference on Assembly Technologies and Systems Institute of Assembly Technology, Leibniz Universität, Hannover (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Assembly TechnologyLeibniz Universität HannoverHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations