Advertisement

Architecture for Cooperative Interacting Robotic Systems Towards Assisted Living: A Preliminary Study

  • L. Ciuccarelli
  • A. Freddi
  • S. IarloriEmail author
  • S. Longhi
  • A. Monteriù
  • D. Ortenzi
  • D. Proietti Pagnotta
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 544)

Abstract

The present study aims at providing a robotic architecture system composed by a semi-autonomous mobile robot and a manipulator robot. The user, on a smart wheelchair, is able to move in an indoor environment, by selecting, through a user-interface, the room where he/she wants to move and the object he/she would like to get. In case an object is selected, the user is automatically driven in front of a robotic workstation, where the desired object is picked and placed by a robotic arm in front of the user. The system has been tested on a simulator, and preliminary experimental results show the feasibility of the proposed architecture.

Keywords

Cooperation Human-Robot Interaction Ambient Assisted Living 

References

  1. 1.
    Feil-Seifer D, J Matarić M (2005) Defining socially assistive robotics, pp 465–468Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bekele E, Wade J, Bian D, Fan J, Swanson A, Warren Z, Sarkar N (2016) Multimodal adaptive social interaction in virtual environment (MASI-VR) for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), pp 121–130Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clodic A, Pacherie E, Alami R, Chatila R (2017) Key elements for human-robot joint action. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 159–177Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fiorini L, D’Onofrio G, Limosani R, Sancarlo D, Greco A, Giuliani F, Kung A, Dario P, Cavallo F (2017) ACCRA project: agile co-creation for robots and agingGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cavallo F, Aquilano M, Bonaccorsi M, Limosani R, Manzi A, Carrozza MC, Dario P (2013) On the design, development and experimentation of the ASTRO assistive robot integrated in smart environments. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, May 2013, pp 4310–4315Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sciutti A, Sandini G (2017) Interacting with robots to investigate the bases of social interaction. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 25(12):2295–2304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee HR, Tan H, Sabanovic S (2016) That robot is not for me: addressing stereotypes of aging in assistive robot design. In: 25th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, pp 312–317Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Romer G, Stuyt H, Peters A (2005) Cost-savings and economic benefits due to the assistive robotic manipulator (ARM). In: 9th International conference on rehabilitation robotics, pp 201–204Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Foresi G, Freddi A, Iarlori S, Monteriù A, Ortenzi D, Pagnotta DP (2017) Human-robot cooperation via brain computer interface. In: 7th International conference on consumer electronics-Berlin (ICCE-Berlin). IEEE, pp 1–2Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chance G, Camilleri A, Winstone B, Caleb-Solly P, Dogramadzi S (2016) An assistive robot to support dressing—strategies for planning and error handling. In: 6th IEEE International conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics (BioRob), pp 774–780Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Le HH, Loomes MJ, Loureiro RC (2016) Group interaction through a multi-modal haptic framework. In: 12th International conference on intelligent environments (IE), pp 62–67Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morales Y, Miyashita T, Hagita N (2017) Social robotic wheelchair centered on passenger and pedestrian comfort. Robot Auton Syst 87:355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Achic F, Montero J, Penaloza C, Cuellar F (2016) Hybrid BCI system to operate an electric wheelchair and a robotic arm for navigation and manipulation tasks. In: IEEE Workshop on advanced robotics and its social impacts. IEEE, pp 249–254Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tsui K, Yanco H, Kontak D, Beliveau L (2008) Development and evaluation of a flexible interface for a wheelchair mounted robotic arm. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction. ACM, pp 105–112Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Foresi G, Freddi A, Monteriù A, Ortenzi D, Pagnotta DP (2018) Improving mobility and autonomy of disabled users via cooperation of assistive robots. In: IEEE International conference on consumer electronics. IEEE, pp 1–2Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cavanini L, Cimini G, Ferracuti F, Freddi A, Ippoliti G, Monteriù A, Verdini F (2017) A GR-code localization system for mobile robots: application to smart wheelchairs, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Quigley M, Conley K, Gerkey B, Faust J, Foote T, Leibs J, Wheeler R, Ng AY (2009) ROS: an open-source robot operating system. In: Workshop on open source software, vol 3Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cavanini L, Benetazzo F, Freddi A, Longhi S, Monteriù A (2014) Slam-based autonomous wheelchair navigation system for AAL scenarios. In: IEEE/ASME 10th International conference on mechatronic and embedded systems and applications, pp 1–5Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Ciuccarelli
    • 1
  • A. Freddi
    • 1
  • S. Iarlori
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Longhi
    • 1
  • A. Monteriù
    • 1
  • D. Ortenzi
    • 2
  • D. Proietti Pagnotta
    • 1
  1. 1.Università Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly
  2. 2.Università di BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations