Advertisement

Assessment of Parkinson’s Disease At-home Using a Natural Interface Based System

  • Claudia FerrarisEmail author
  • Roberto Nerino
  • Antonio Chimienti
  • Giuseppe Pettiti
  • Corrado Azzaro
  • Giovanni Albani
  • Lorenzo Priano
  • Alessandro Mauro
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 544)

Abstract

A system for the management of the automatic assessment of Parkinson’s Disease (PD) at-home is presented. The system is based on a non-contact and natural human computer interface which is suitable for motor impaired users, as are PD patients. The interface, built around optical RGB-Depth devices, allows for both gesture-based interaction with the system and tracking of hands and body movements during the performance of standard upper and lower limb tasks, as specified by the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). The accurate tracking and characterization of the movements allows for an automatic and objective assessment of the UPDRS tasks, making feasible the monitoring of motor fluctuations at-home and on daily basis, which are important features in the management of the disease progression. The assessment of the different tasks is performed by machine learning techniques. Selected kinematic parameters characterizing the movements are input to trained classifiers to rate the motor performance. Results on monitoring experiments at-home and on the system accuracy as compared to clinical evaluations are presented and discussed.

Keywords

Parkinson’s disease Movement disorders UPDRS Automated assessment Natural human computer interface RGB-Depth At-home monitoring Hand tracking Body tracking 

References

  1. 1.
    Pal G, Goetz CG (2013) Assessing bradykinesia in Parkinsonian disorders. Front Neurol 4(54):1–5. eCollectionGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    UPDRS (2003) Movement disorder society task force on rating scales for Parkinson’s disease: the unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale (UPDRS): status and recommendations. Mov Disord 18(7):738–750Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Richards M, Marder K, Cote L, Mayeux R (1994) Interrater reliability of the unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale motor examination. Mov Disord 9(1):89–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taylor Tavares AL, Jefferis GS, Koop M, Hill BC, Hastie T, Heit G, Bronte-Stewart HM (2005) Quantitative measurements of alternating finger tapping in Parkinson’s disease correlate with UPDRS motor disability and reveal the improvement in fine motor control from medication and deep brain stimulation. Mov Disord 20(10):1286–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heldman DA, Giuffrida JP, Chen R, Payne M, Mazzella F et al (2011) The modified bradykinesia rating scale for Parkinson’s disease: reliability and comparison with kinematic measures. Mov Disord 26(10):1859–1863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Espay AJ, Bonato P, Nahab FB, Maetzler W, Dean JM et al (2016) Technology in Parkinson’s disease: challenges and opportunities. Mov Disord 31(9):1272–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Patel S, Lorincz K, Hughes R, Huggins N, Growdon J, Standaert D et al (2009) Monitoring motor fluctuations in patients with Parkinson’s disease using wearable sensors. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 13(6):864–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Espay AJ, Giuffrida JP, Chen R, Payne M, Mazzella F, Dunn E, Vaughan JE, Duker AP, Sahay A, Kim SJ, Revilla FJ, Heldman DA (2011) Differential response of speed, amplitude and rhythm to dopaminergic medications in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 26(14):2504–2508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mera TO, Heldman DA, Espay AJ, Payne M, Giuffrida JP (2012) Feasibility of home-based automated Parkinson’s disease motor assessment. J Neurosci Methods 203(1):152–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Han J, Shao L, Xu D, Shotton J (2013) Enhanced computer vision with Microsoft Kinect sensor: a review. IEEE Trans Cybern 43(5):1318–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Galna B, Barry G, Jackson D, Mhiripiri D, Olivier P, Rochester L (2014) Accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect sensor for measuring movement in people with Parkinson’s disease. Gait & Posture 39(4):1062–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ferraris C, Nerino R, Chimienti A, Pettiti G, Pianu D, Albani G, Azzaro C, Contin L, Cimolin V, Mauro A (2014) Remote monitoring and rehabilitation for patients with neurological diseases. In: 10th international conference on body area networks, London, Sep 29–Oct 1Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bank PJM, Marinus J, Meskers CJP, De Groot JH, Van Hilten JJ (2017) Optical hand tracking: a novel technique for the assessment of bradykinesia in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord Clinical Practice 4(6):875–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dror B, Yanai E, Frid A, Peleg N, Goldenthal N, Schlesinger I, Hel-Or H, Raz S (2014) Automatic assessment of Parkinson’s disease from natural hands movements using 3D depth sensor. In: IEEE 28th convention of Electrical & Electronics Engineers in Israel (IEEEI)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ferraris C, Pianu D, Chimienti A, Pettiti G, Cimolin V, Cau N, Nerino R (2015) Evaluation of finger tapping test accuracy using the LeapMotion and the Intel RealSense sensors. In: EMBC 2015, 37th annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology SocietyGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ (1992) UK Parkinson’s disease society brain bank clinical diagnostic criteria. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55:181–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chang CC, Lin CJ (2011) LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol (TIST) 2(3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudia Ferraris
    • 1
    Email author
  • Roberto Nerino
    • 1
  • Antonio Chimienti
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Pettiti
    • 1
  • Corrado Azzaro
    • 2
  • Giovanni Albani
    • 2
  • Lorenzo Priano
    • 3
  • Alessandro Mauro
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Electronics, Computer and Telecommunication EngineeringNational Research CouncilTurinItaly
  2. 2.Department of Neurology and NeuroRehabilitation, San Giuseppe HospitalIstituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCSPiancavalloItaly
  3. 3.Dipartimento di NeuroscienzeUniversità degli Studi di TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations