Advertisement

From Startup to Scaleup: An Interview Study of the Development of User Experience Work in a Data-Intensive Company

  • Kati KuusinenEmail author
  • Martin Kjølbye Sørensen
  • Nicklas Mandrup Frederiksen
  • Niclas Kildahl Laugesen
  • Søren Holm Juul
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11262)

Abstract

Small startups often do not have the resources or the skills for upfront qualitative user studies and user experience design. Instead, they operate in market-driven environment where requirements are often invented and validated through frequent releases. The research on how startups do this in practice is scarce. Even less is known about what kind of engineering and user experience practices would help startups to survive and grow into successful businesses. This paper describes how user experience work emerged and grew in a data-intensive startup company operating in the financial sector in Denmark. The paper is based on the interviews of four persons with different roles in the startup. The emerging issues in user experience were found to be in the lack of skills in user experience and in balancing between the use of quantitative and qualitative user data. To conclude, it seems evident that startups would benefit from user experience practices but more research is needed to develop practices that would suit for this particular context.

Keywords

Agile development User experience Startup Scaleup 

References

  1. 1.
    Aernoudt, R.: Executive forum: the scale-up gap: and how to address it. Ventur. Cap. 19(4), 361–372 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2017.1348724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bosch, J.: Building products as innovation experiment systems. In: Cusumano, M.A., Iyer, B., Venkatraman, N. (eds.) ICSOB 2012. LNBIP, vol. 114, pp. 27–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30746-1_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brhel, M., Meth, H., Maedche, A., Werder, K.: Exploring principles of user-centered agile software development: a literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 61, 163–181 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    European Commission: Europe’s next leaders: the start-up and scale-up initiative (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dahlstedt, A., Karlsson, L., Persson, A., NattochDag, J., Regnell, B.: Market-driven requirements engineering processes for software products-a report on current practices. In: International Workshop on COTS and Product Software: Why Requirements are So Important (RECOTS) (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edison, H.: Lean internal startups: empowering software product innovation in large companies (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fagerholm, F., Guinea, A.S., Mäenpää, H., Münch, J.: The right model for continuous experimentation. J. Syst. Softw. 123, 292–305 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giardino, C., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Paternoster, N., Gorschek, T., Abrahamsson, P.: What do we know about software development in startups? IEEE Softw. 31(5), 28–32 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hokkanen, L., Kuusinen, K., Väänänen, K.: Early product design in startups: towards a UX strategy. In: Abrahamsson, P., Corral, L., Oivo, M., Russo, B. (eds.) PROFES 2015. LNCS, vol. 9459, pp. 217–224. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26844-6_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hokkanen, L., Kuusinen, K., Väänänen, K.: Minimum viable user EXperience: a framework for supporting product design in startups. In: Sharp, H., Hall, T. (eds.) XP 2016. LNBIP, vol. 251, pp. 66–78. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33515-5_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hokkanen, L., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K.: UX work in startups: current practices and future needs. In: Lassenius, C., Dingsøyr, T., Paasivaara, M. (eds.) XP 2015. LNBIP, vol. 212, pp. 81–92. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18612-2_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klotins, E., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Gorschek, T.: Software engineering in start-up companies: an analysis of 88 experience reports. Empir. Softw. Eng., 1–35 (2018)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lacey, A., Luff, D.: Qualitative data analysis. Trent Focus Sheffield (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ladas, C.: Scrumban-Essays on Kanban Systems for Lean Software Development. Lulu. com, Seattle (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Law, E., Roto, V., Vermeeren, A.P., Kort, J., Hassenzahl, M.: Towards a shared definition of user experience. In: CHI 2008 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2395–2398. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Law, E.L.C., Lárusdóttir, M.K.: Whose experience do we care about? Analysis of the fitness of scrum and kanban to user experience. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 31(9), 584–602 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Olsson, H.H., Bosch, J.: From opinions to data-driven software r&d: a multi-case study on how to close the ‘open loop’ problem. In: 2014 40th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), pp. 9–16. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Owens, T., Fernandez, O.: The Lean Enterprise: How Corporations Can Innovate Like Startups. Wiley, New York (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ries, E.: The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. Crown Books, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schwaber, K., Beedle, M.: Agile Software Development with Scrum, vol. 1. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sutton, S.M.: The role of process in software start-up. IEEE Softw. 17(4), 33–39 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sy, D.: Adapting usability investigations for agile user-centered design. J. Usability Stud. 2(3), 112–132 (2007)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yaman, S.G., et al.: Introducing continuous experimentation in large software-intensive product and service organisations. J. Syst. Softw. 133, 195–211 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MMMI InstituteUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense MDenmark
  2. 2.University of Southern DenmarkOdense MDenmark

Personalised recommendations