Advertisement

Truth, History Revision, and South Korea’s Mnemonic Representation of the Past

  • Ñusta Carranza Ko
Chapter

Abstract

The production of collective memory and history is embedded in transitional justice processes of truth-seeking, reparations, prosecutions, and other legislative reforms that address a state’s past abuses. This study builds on the growing interest in memory initiatives by bringing to light the integral role memory practices play in truth-seeking and reparations policies. Particularly, it focuses on memory initiatives as part of a broader set of symbolic reparations integrated in truth commission work. Drawing from observations of a state which is a relative latecomer to transitional justice processes, this chapter examines South Korea’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission and its relationship with the production of collective memory, focusing on symbolic reparations of history revision via the national history textbook. Using political discourse analysis, this study compares the historical truth from the truth commission to the national history textbook, focusing on the portrayal of the truth and narrative about human rights abuses in recent Korean history. Through this analysis, the research finds that human rights language in history revisions discursively contests the truth commissions’ conclusions. The collective memory from the textbook points for the need to reevaluate the politics behind the creation of memory even in a state that transitioned to a democracy, instituted over ten truth commissions, and held two former heads of state criminally accountable.

Keywords

Transitional justice Truth-seeking Reparations Prosecutions Truth and Reconciliation Commission Collective memory History revision History textbook Discourse analysis 

References

  1. Acosta, Mariclaire, and Esa Ennelin. 2006. The Mexican Solution to Transitional Justice. In Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century, Beyond Truth versus Justice, ed. Naomi Mariezcurrena, 94–119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apple, Michael W. 1993. Official Knowledge: Democratic Education in a Conservative Age. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2004. Cultural Politics and the Text. In The Routledge Falmer Reader in Sociology of Education Sociology of Education, ed. Stephen J. Ball, 179–195. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, Don. 2010. Exacerbated Politics: The Legacy of Political Trauma in South Korea. In Northeast Asia’s Difficult Past: Essays in Collective Memory, ed. Mikyoung Kim and Barry Schwartz, 193–212. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bassin, Ari S., and Paul Van Zyl. 2009. The Story of Samuel Hinga Norman in Sierra Leone: Can Truth Commissions and Criminal Prosecutions Coexist After Conflict? In Human Rights Advocacy Stories, ed. Deena R. Hurwitz, Margaret L. Satterthwaite, and Doug Ford, 229–266. New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, Kris. 2013. Commemoration as Symbolic Reparation: New Narratives or Spaces of Conflict? Human Rights Review 14: 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, Albert H.Y. 2010. Emergency Powers, Constitutionalism and Legal Transplants: The East Asian Experience. In Emergency Powers in Asia: Exploring the Limits of Legality, ed. Victor V. Ramraj and Arun K. Thiruvengadam, 56–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ciurlizza, Javier, and Eduardo González. 2006. Truth and Justice from the Perspective of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. In The Legacy of Truth: Criminal Justice in the Peruvian Tradition, ed. Lisa Magarrell and Leonardo Filippini, 5–14. New York: ICTJ.Google Scholar
  9. Cole, Elizabeth A. 2007. Transitional Justice and the Reform of History Education. International Journal of Transitional Justice 1: 115–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Greiff, Pablo. 2006. Justice and Reparations. In The Handbook of Reparations, ed. Pablo de Greiff, 452–478. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dube, S.I. 2011. Transitional Justice Beyond the Normative: Towards a Literary Theory of Political Transitions. International Journal of Transitional Justice 5 (2): 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 2000. The Moral Foundations of Truth Commissions. In Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions, ed. Robert I. Rotberg and Dennis Thompson, 22–44. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamber, Brandon, and Richard A. Wilson. 2002. Symbolic Closure through Memory, Reparation, and Revenge in Post-Conflict Societies. Journal of Human Rights 1 (1): 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayner, Priscilla B. 2001. Unspeakable Truths: Confronting State Terror and Atrocity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Heo, Uk, and Terence Roehrig. 2010. South Korea Since 1980: Democratization, Economic Struggle, and Nuclear Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jean, Ahn. 2003. The Socio-Economic Background of the Gwangju Uprising. New Political Science 25 (2): 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jelin, Elizabeth. 2007. Public Memorialization in Perspective: Truth, Justice and Memory of Past Repression in the Southern Cone of South America. The International Journal of Transitional Justice 1: 138–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kang, Jung In. 2014. Korean Politics: From the Perspective of the Dialectic of Non-Simultaneity. In Contemporary Korean Political Thought in Search of a Post-Eurocentric Approach, ed. Jung In Kang, 21–44. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  20. Katsiaficas, George. 2012. Asia’s Unknown Uprisings Volume 1: South Korean Social Movements in the 20th Century. Oakland: PM Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kim, Dong-Choon. 2015. Critical Assessments of the South Korean Truth and Reconciliation Commission. In Routledge Handbook of Memory and Reconciliation in East Asia, ed. Mikyoung Kim, 170–185. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim, Il-Woo. 2016. 국정교과서, 대구 10월항쟁을 조선 공산당으로 왜곡 [National Government Textbook, Mischaracterizes Daegu’s Uprising as Chosun Communist Party Led]. Hankyurae, November 29. http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/area/772498.html.
  23. Kim, Kyung Wook. 2017. 국정교과서 최종본 공개…‘박정희 미화·친일파 축소' 그대로 [National History Textbook Final Copy Revealed… Park Chung Hee’s Positive Portrayal and Pro-Japanese Collaborators Information Mitigated Unchanged]. Hankyurae, January 31. http://www.huffingtonpost.kr/2017/01/31/story_n_14515820.html.
  24. Kim, Mikyoung. 2013. Human Rights, Memory and Reconciliation: Korea–Japan Relations. The Asia-Pacific Journal 11 (10): 1–11.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 2014. Memorializing Comfort Women: Memory and Human Rights in Korea–Japan Relations. Asian Politics & Policy 6 (1): 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ———. 2015. Introduction: Memory and Reconciliation in East Asia. In Routledge Handbook of Memory and Reconciliation in East Asia, ed. Mikyoung Kim, 17–27. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ———. 2016. Memory and Reconciliation in East Asia. Korean Journal of International and Comparative Law 4: 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee, Chan Hee. 2010. 한일 역사교과서 편찬제도의 변천 [Changes to Korean and Japanese History Textbooks Compilation Systems]. In Second Korean Japanese Joint History Research Committee Report Volume 6—Textbook Committee, ed. Korean Japanese Joint History Research Committee, 135–164. Seoul: Korean Japanese Joint History Research Committee.Google Scholar
  29. Loyle, Cyanne E., and Christian Davenport. 2014. Transitional Justice and Injustice: The Uses and Misues of the Liberal Peace. In The Uses and Misuses of Human Rights, ed. George Anreopoulos and Zehra F. Kabasakal Arat, 173–194. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Manning, Peter. 2017. Transitional Justice and Memory in Cambodia. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ministry of Education. 2016. 국사편찬위원회 고등학교 한국사 현장검토본 [National Compilation Committee on Korean History, High School Korean History Inspection Copy]. Seoul: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  32. Moon, Claire. 2006. Narrating Political Reconciliation: Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa. Social & Legal Studies 15 (2): 257–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. ———. 2012. ‘Who’ll Pay Reparations on My Soul?’ Compensation, Social Control and Social Suffering. Social & Legal Studies 21 (2): 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moon, Young Joo. 2012. 고등학교 교육과정 한국 근 현대사 내용의 교과서 연계 내용 분석 및 박물관 프로그램 연계 방안 제언 [Analysis of Korean Modern and Contemporary History Textbook Content in High School Education and Recommendations on Connecting the Program with Museums]. In 근현대사 수준별 교육과정 교과서 연계 내용 분석 [Analysis of Korean Modern and Contemporary History Curriculum and Textbook at Varying Levels of Education], ed. Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism, 113–144. Seoul: Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism.Google Scholar
  35. National Archives of Korea. 2017. 진실 화해를 위한 과거사정리위원회 (TRCK). TRCK. http://www.archives.go.kr/next/search/listSubjectDescription.do?id=008775.
  36. Olick, Jeffrey K. 1999. Collective Memory: Two Cultures. Sociological Theory 17 (3): 333–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rotberg, Robert I. 2000. Truth Commissions and the Provision of Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation. The Moral Foundations of Truth Commissions. In Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions, ed. Robert I. Rotberg and Dennis Thompson, 3–21. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rûsen, Jörn. 2004. Historical Consciousness: Narrative Structure, Moral Function, and Ontogenetic Development. In Theorizing Historical Consciousness, ed. Peter Seixas, 63–85. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  39. TRCK. 2006. (진실 화해를 위한 과거사정리위원회). 2006 상반기 조사보고서 (2005.12.1–2006.5.31) (2006 Year Report). Seoul: TRCK (진실 화해를 위한 과거사정리위원회).Google Scholar
  40. ———. 2010a. (진실 화해를 위한 과거사정리위원회). 종합보고서 I: 위원회의 연혁과 활동 종합권고 (Final Report Volume I). Seoul: TRCK (진실 화해를 위한 과거사정리위원회).Google Scholar
  41. ———. 2010b. (진실 화해를 위한 과거사정리위원회). 종합보고서 IV: 인권침해사건 (Final Report Volume IV). Seoul: TRCK (진실 화해를 위한 과거사정리위원회).Google Scholar
  42. Van Dijk, Teun A. 1997. What is Political Discourse Analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11: 11–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilson, Richard A. 2001. The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimizing the Post-Apartheid State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ñusta Carranza Ko
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BaltimoreBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations