Advertisement

Introduction: What Does the Social Construction of Stress Mean?

  • Marc Loriol
Chapter

Abstract

Over the last three decades, stress and other forms of suffering at work (including burnout, mobbing, bullying and issues relating to the work-life balance) have emerged as important social and medical issues in Western countries. Despite the lack of empirical data supporting the clinical, biological and psychological causes of stress, most experts, academics and stakeholders in the stress management field behave as if stress were an objective illness, clearly diagnosable and definable in different social and cultural situations. On the contrary, researches gathered in this book show how perception of stressors and stress processes is embedded both in macro-social and micro-social contexts. These context frame actors’ strategies created and actors construct the situations: in that way, stress and suffering at work can be understood as the result of management practices, labour union strategies, the innovative theories of psychologists or doctors, news magazine articles, public health policies and so on.

References

  1. Allard-Poesi, F., & Hollet-Haudebert, S. (2017). The sound of silence: Measuring suffering at work. Human Relations, 70(12), 1442–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, P., & Zijderveld, A. (2009). In praise of doubt: How to have convictions without becoming a fanatic. San Francisco: HarperOne.Google Scholar
  4. Bourassa, L., & Ashforth, B. E. (1998). You are about to party defiant style: Socialization and identity onboard an Alaskan fishing boat. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 27(2), 171–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hacking, I. (1998). Mad travellers: Reflections on the reality of transient illnesses. Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
  7. Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Harkness, A., Long, B., Bermbach, N., Patterson, K., Jordan, S., & Kahn, H. (2005). Talking about work stress: Discourse analysis and implications for stress interventions. Work & Stress, 19, 121–136.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370500160068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haslanger, S. (2012). Resisting reality: Social construction and social critique. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Haslam, S. A., O’Brien, A., Jetten, J., Vormedal, K., & Penna, S. (2005). Taking the strain: Social identity, social support, and the experience of stress. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hobfoll, S. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. The American Psychologist, 44(3): 513–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. James, K., Lovato, C., & Khoo, G. (1994). Social identity correlates of minority workers’ health. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), 383–396.Google Scholar
  13. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Latour, B. (2006). Changer de société, refaire de la sociologie. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  15. Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Loriol, M. (2012). La construction du social. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
  17. Loriol, M. (2016). Collective forms of coping and the social construction of work stress among industrial workers and police officers in France. Theory and Psychology, 26(1), 112–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Loriol, M. (2017). Stress, souffrance et RPS: Constructions profanes, constructions syndicales et constructions expertes. In G. Tiffon & L. Goussard (Eds.), Syndicalisme et santé au travail (pp. 107–118). Vulaines-sur-Seine: Les éditions du Croquant.Google Scholar
  19. Malakit, P., & Olsson, J. (2015). Perceptions on burnout and work related stress: A discursive analysis on the awareness of work related stress and burnout amongst Social Workers at the Child and Youth Department in Uppsala (Bachelor thesis, Study program in International Social Work).Google Scholar
  20. Mühlhaus, J., & Bouwmeester, O. (2016). The paradoxical effect of self-categorization on work stress in a high-status occupation: Insights from management consulting. Human Relations, 69(9), 1823–1852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Muldoon, O. T., Schmid, K., & Downes, C. (2009). Political violence and psychological well-being: The role of social identity. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58(1), 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Outten, H. R., Schmitt, M. T., Garcia, D. M., & Branscombe, N. R. (2009). Coping options: Missing links between minority group identification and psychological well-being. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58(1), 147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Postmes, T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2002). Influence of long-term racial environmental composition on subjective well-being in African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 735–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scott, J. (1990). Deconstructing equality-versus-difference: Or, the use of poststructuralist theory for feminism. In M. Hirsch & E. Keller (Eds.), Conflicts in feminism (pp. 134–148). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  26. Seeman, M. (1959). On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review, 24, 783–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sica, A. (2016). Social construction as fantasy: Reconsidering Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann’s the social construction of reality after 50 years. Cultural Sociology, 10(1), 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thunman, E., & Persson, M. (2015). Justifying the authentic self: Swedish public service workers talking about work stress. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16(1), Art. 13. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1501130.
  29. Ulus, E., & Gabriel, Y. (2016). Bridging the contradictions of social constructionism and psychoanalysis in a study of workplace emotions in India. Culture and Organization, 24, 221–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Veyne, P. (1996). Foucault revolutionizes history. In A. I. Davidson (Ed.), Foucault and his interlocutors. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Loriol
    • 1
  1. 1.Institutions et Dynamiques Historiques de L’Économie et de la Société (IDHES)Panthéon-Sorbonne UniversityParisFrance

Personalised recommendations