Advertisement

Stakeholder’s Experiences of the Forensic Child Protection Paradigm

  • Helen BuckleyEmail author
  • Morag McArthur
  • Tim Moore
  • Erica Russ
  • Tania Withington
Chapter
Part of the Child Maltreatment book series (MALT, volume 9)

Abstract

This chapter, drawing on recent international empirical research, illustrates the perspectives of key stakeholders in the child welfare and protection services: Children, caregivers and practitioners. It shows that while there is an awareness of what children and families require in order to lead supported and healthy lives, the current system is challenged in its attempts to adequately address their needs due to its forensic and highly regulated orientation. Although reforms have been proposed, parallel developments such as mandatory reporting and the imposition of a bureaucratic regulatory framework, have presented obstacles to their establishment. The experiences of children and young people are reported, illustrating their ambivalent view of the services on offer, the way that the system can sometimes compound their negative self-images and the type of supports that they identify as positive. Although the importance of the helping alliance as an effective child protection intervention is well recognised, the chapter shows that caregivers, who include foster carers, experience the current system in ways that are sometimes perceived as unsupportive, unreliable and almost punitive. Finally, the chapter focuses on practitioners in child protection and illustrates that although many workers are highly skilled and resilient, the stability of the workforce is undermined at times by the pressures imposed by the risk-focused nature of the system. The chapter makes the case for a new paradigm, which is well informed, therapeutic and ecological in its orientation.

Keywords

Child in Care Child protection Child welfare Foster carer Out-of-home care Paradigm Service user 

References

  1. Adamson, C., Beddoe, L., & Davys, A. (2012). Building resilient practitioners: Definitions and practitioner understandings. British Journal of Social Work, 44(3), 522–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldgate, J., & McIntosh, M. (2006). Looking after the family: A study of children looked after in kinship care in Scotland. Edinburgh: Social Work Inspection Agency Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  3. Altman, J. C., & Cohen, C. S. (2016). “I could not have made it without them”: Examining Trainee Cohort Perspectives on MSW Education for Public Child Welfare. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 10(5), 524–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anglin, J. P. (2014). Pain, normality, and the struggle for congruence: Reinterpreting residential care for children and youth. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barth, R. P., Lloyd, E. C., Christ, S. L., Chapman, M. V., & Dickinson, N. S. (2008). Child welfare worker characteristics and job satisfaction: A national study. Social Work, 53(3), 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bijleveld, G. G., Dedding, C. W., & Bunders-Aelen, J. F. (2015). Children’s and young people’s participation within child welfare and child protection services: A state-of-the-art review. Child & Family Social Work, 20(2), 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bromfield, L., Arney, F., & Higgins, D. (2014). Child protection: Legal grounds for intervening in family life to ensure child safety. In A. Hayes & D. Higgins (Eds.), Families, policy and the law: Selected essays on contemporary issues for Australia (pp. 121–129). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, J. D., & Bednar, L. M. (2006). Foster parent perceptions of placement breakdown. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(12), 1497–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buckley, H. (2017). In M. Connolly (Ed.),. Beyond the risk paradigm in child protection Service users as receivers of risk-dominated practice. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buckley, H., Carr, N., & Whelan, S. (2011a). ‘Like walking on eggshells’: Service user views and expectations of the child protection system. Child & Family Social Work, 16(1), 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buckley, H., Whelan, S., & Carr, N. (2011b). ‘Like waking up in a Franz Kafka novel’: Service users’ experiences of the child protection system when domestic violence and acrimonious separations are involved. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(1), 126–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Butler, S., & Charles, M. (1999). The past, the present, but never the future’: Thematic representations of fostering disruption. Child and Family Social Work, 4, 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collins, S. (2017). Social workers and resilience revisited. Practice, 29(2), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Connolly, M., & Masson, J. (2014). Private and public voices: Does family group conferencing privilege the voice of children and families in child welfare? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 36(4), 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooley, M., Wojciak, A. S., Farineau, H., & Mullis, A. (2015). The association between perception of relationship with caregivers and behaviours of youth in foster care: A child and caregiver perspective. Journal of Social Work Practice, 29(2), 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cossar, J., Brandon, M., & Jordan, P. (2016). ‘You’ve got to trust her and she’s got to trust you’: Children’s views on participation in the child protection system. Child & Family Social Work, 21(1), 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Boer, C., & Coady, N. (2007). Good helping relationships in child welfare: Learning from stories of success. Child & Family Social Work, 12(1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dillon, J., Greenop, D., & Hills, M. (2016). Participation in child protection: A small-scale qualitative study. Qualitative Social Work, 15(1), 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doidge, J. C., Higgins, D. J., Delfabbro, P., Edwards, B., Vassallo, S., Toumbourou, J. W., & Segal, L. (2017). Economic predictors of child maltreatment in an Australian population-based birth cohort. Children and Youth Services Review, 72, 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Featherstone, B., & Evans, H. (2004). Children experiencing maltreatment: Who do they turn to? London: NSPCC.Google Scholar
  22. Featherstone, B., White, S., & Wastell, D. (2012). Ireland’s opportunity to learn from England’s difficulties? Auditing uncertainty in child protection. Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies, 12(1), 5.Google Scholar
  23. Featherstone, B., Morris, K., & White, S. (2014). Re-imagining child protection: Towards humane social work with families. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gibbons, J., Bell, C., & Conroy, S. (1995). Operating the child protection system: A study of child protection practices in English local authorities. London: HM Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  25. Gilbertson, R., & Barber, J. (2003). Breakdown of foster care placement: Carer perspectives and system factors. Australian Social Work, 56(4), 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gillingham, P. (2016). Social work and child protection in Australia: Whose job is it anyway? Practice, 28(2), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Griffiths, A., Royse, D., Culver, K., Piescher, K., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Who stays, who goes, who knows? A state-wide survey of child welfare workers. Children and Youth Services Review, 77, 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Halsey, K., Murfield, J., Harland, J. L., & Lord, P. (2006). The voice of young people: An engine for improvement? Scoping the evidence. Reading: CfBT Education Trust.Google Scholar
  29. Harker, R. M., Dobel-Ober, D., Lawrence, J., Berridge, D., & Sinclair, R. (2003). Who takes care of education? Looked after children’s perceptions of support for educational progress. Child & Family Social Work, 8(2), 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Healy, K., & Oltedal, S. (2010). An institutional comparison of child protection systems in Australia and Norway focused on workforce retention. Journal of Social Policy, 39(2), 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harris, P. L. ( 2012 ). Trusting what you're told: How children learn from others. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Healy, K., Harrison, G., Venables, J., & Bosly, F. (2016). Collaborating with families in differential responses: Practitioners’ views. Child & Family Social Work, 21(3), 328–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Higgins, D., & Katz, I. (2008). Enhancing service systems for protecting children: Promoting child well-being and child protection reform in Australia. Family Matters, 80, 43–50.Google Scholar
  34. Holtan, A. (2008). Family types and social integration in kinship foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(9), 1022–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Honey, K. L., Rees, P., & Griffey, S. (2011). Investigating self-perceptions and resilience in Looked After Children. Educational Psychology in Practice, 27(1), 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hood, R., Goldacre, A., Grant, R., & Jones, R. (2016a). Exploring demand and provision in English child protection services. The British Journal of Social Work, 46(4), 923–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hood, R., Grant, R., Jones, R., & Goldacre, A. (2016b). A study of performance indicators and Ofsted ratings in English child protection services. Children and Youth Services Review, 67, 50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hyde, A., Fullerton, D., Lohan, M., Dunne, L., & Macdonald, G. (2017). Young people’s views on the impact of care experiences on their ability to form positive intimate relationships. Adoption & Fostering, 41(3), 242–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jobe, A., & Gorin, S. (2013). ‘If kids don’t feel safe they don’t do anything’: Young people’s views on seeking and receiving help from Children’s Social Care Services in England. Child & Family Social Work, 18(4), 429–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Khoo, E., & Skoog, V. (2014). The road to placement breakdown: Foster parents’ experiences of the events surrounding the unexpected ending of a child’s placement in their care. Qualitative Social Work, 13(2), 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim, H., & Kao, D. (2014). A meta-analysis of turnover intention predictors among US child welfare workers. Children and Youth Services Review, 47, 214–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kojan, B. H., & Lonne, B. (2012). A comparison of systems and outcomes for safeguarding children in Australia and Norway. Child & Family Social Work, 17(1), 96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leathers, S. J. (2006). Placement disruption and negative placement outcomes among adolescents in long-term foster care: The role of behavior problems. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30(3), 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leeson, C. (2007). My life in care: Experiences of non-participation in decision-making processes. Child & Family Social Work, 12(3), 268–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lonne, B. (2013). Reshaping our protective systems: Issues and options. Communities, Children and Families Australia, 7(1), 9–20.Google Scholar
  46. Lonne, B., Parton, N., Thomson, J., & Harries, M. (2009). Reforming child protection. London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  47. Lonne, B., Harries, M., & Lantz, S. (2013). Workforce development: A pathway to reforming child protection systems in Australia. British Journal of Social Work, 43(8), 1630–1648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Magnussen, A.-M., & Skivenes, M. (2015). The child’s opinion and position in care Order proceedings. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 23(4), 705–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mannay, D., Evans, R., Staples, E., Hallett, S., Roberts, L., Rees, A., & Andrews, D. (2017). The consequences of being labelled ‘looked-after’: Exploring the educational experiences of looked-after children and young people in Wales. British Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 683–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Matthews, F. T. (2016). What is important to looked-after young people during adolescence? A qualitatively driven photo-elicitation study. Leeds: University of Leeds.Google Scholar
  51. Melton, G. B. (2014). In J. Korbin & D. Krugman (Eds.),. Handbook of child maltreatment Strong Communities for Children: A community-wide approach to prevention of child maltreatment (pp. 329–339). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  52. Moore, T., McArthur, M., Death, J., Roche, S., & Tilbury, C. (2016). Safe and sound: Exploring the safety of young people in residential care (1925289990). Melbourne: Institute of Child Protection Studies, Australian Catholic University. Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Sydney. Retrieved from https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/file-list/Research%20Report%20-%20Safe%20and%20Sound%20Exploring%20the%20safety%20of%20young%20people%20in%20residential%20care%20-%20Causes.pdf
  53. Moore, T., McArthur, M., Death, J., Tilbury, C., & Roche, S. (2017). Young people’s views on safety and preventing abuse and harm in residential care:“It’s got to be better than home”. Children and Youth Services Review, 81, 212–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Morrison, R., & Shepherd, M. (2015). Exploring factors contributing to the outcomes of Looked After Children. Communicare, 1(2).Google Scholar
  55. Moss, M. (2009). Broken circles to a different identity: An exploration of identity for children in out–of-home care in Queensland, Australia. Child & Family Social Work, 14(3), 311–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Munro, E. (2001). Empowering looked-after children. Child and Family Social Work, 6(2), 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Oke, N., Rostill-Brookes, H., & Larkin, M. (2013). Against the odds: Foster carers’ perceptions of family, commitment and belonging in successful placements. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 18(1), 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pinto, C., & Woolgar, M. (2015). Looked-after children–a perspective into a more resilient future. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 20(4), 181–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Richardson, J., & Joughin, C. (2000). The mental health needs of looked after children. London: RCPsych Publications.Google Scholar
  60. Rostill-Brookes, H., Larkin, M., Toms, A., & Churchman, C. (2011). A shared experience of fragmentation: Making sense of foster placement breakdown. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16(1), 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ruch, G. (2005). Relationship-based practice and reflective practice: Holistic approaches to contemporary child care social work. Child & Family Social Work, 10(2), 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Russ, E. (2016). Witnessing resilience: Resilience of child protection workers in Queensland (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Queensland: Brisbane.Google Scholar
  63. Russ, E., Lonne, B., & Darlington, Y. (2009). Using resilience to reconceptualise child protection workforce capacity. Australian Social Work, 62(3), 324–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schofield, G., Biggart, L., Ward, E., & Larsson, B. (2015). Looked after children and offending: An exploration of risk, resilience and the role of social cognition. Children and Youth Services Review, 51, 125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Scott, D. (2009). Regulatory principles and reforming possibilities in child protection: What might be in the best interests of children? Communities. Children and Families Australia, 4(1), 65.Google Scholar
  66. Scott, D., Arney, F., & Vimpani, G. (2010). Think child, think family, think community. In F. Arney & D. Scott (Eds.), Working with vulnerable families (pp. 7–33). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sinclair, I., & Wilson, K. (2003). Matches and mismatches: The contribution of carers and children to the success of foster placements. British Journal of Social Work, 33(7), 871–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Smithson, R., & Gibson, M. (2017). Less than human: A qualitative study into the experience of parents involved in the child protection system. Child & Family Social Work, 22(2), 565–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sprang, G., Craig, C., & Clark, J. (2011). Secondary traumatic stress and burnout in child welfare workers: A comparative analysis of occupational distress across professional groups. Child Welfare, 90(6), 149–168.Google Scholar
  70. Strijker, J., Zandberg, T., & van der Meulen, B. F. (2003). Kinship foster care and foster care in the Netherlands. Children and Youth Services Review, 25(11), 843–862.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-7409(03)00089-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Thomas, N. (2011). Care planning and review for looked after children: Fifteen years of slow progress? The British Journal of Social Work, 41(2), 387–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Thorpe, D. H. (1994). Evaluating child protection. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Turney, D. (2012). A relationship-based approach to engaging involuntary clients: The contribution of recognition theory. Child & Family Social Work, 17(2), 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tusla Child and Family Agency [Ireland]. (2017). The Prevention, Partnership and Family Support Programme: Collaborative leadership for better outcomes. Retrieved from http://www.tusla.ie/uploads/content/PPFS_Low_Prevention_Services_Brochure.pdf
  75. Winkworth, G., & McArthur, M. (2007). Developing communities of support for vulnerable children: Shifting the focus from risk. Communities, Children and Families Australia, 3(2), 44–54.Google Scholar
  76. Withington, T., Burton, J., Lonne, B., & Eviers, A. (2016). Carer perspectives of factors affecting placement trajectories of children in out-of-home care. Children and Youth Services Review, 65, 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Withington, T., Duplock, R., Burton, J., Eivers, A., & Lonne, B. (2017). Exploring children’s perspectives of engagement with their carers using factor analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 63, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wood, M., & Selwyn, J. (2017). Looked after children and young people’s views on what matters to their subjective well-being. Adoption & Fostering, 41(1), 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen Buckley
    • 1
    Email author
  • Morag McArthur
    • 2
  • Tim Moore
    • 3
  • Erica Russ
    • 4
  • Tania Withington
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Social Work and Social PolicyTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
  2. 2.Institute of Child Protection StudiesAustralian Catholic UniversityCanberraAustralia
  3. 3.Australian Centre for Child ProtectionUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
  4. 4.School of HealthUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  5. 5.Children’s Health Queensland, Hospital and Health Service, Child and Youth Mental Health ServiceQueensland HealthBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations