Advertisement

‘Art’ of Ethnography: Feminist Ethnography and Women Artists in South Asia

  • Pooja Kalita
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter primarily delves into the broader question of whether there can be a feminist ethnography that considers art by women in South Asia as the primary ethnographic material. The chapter argues in the affirmative. In spite of the concerns, scepticisms and questions surrounding feminist ethnography in general and in the context of South Asia in particular, art by women in the region can serve as a powerful material for ethnographic inquiry. Feminist ethnography and art practices by South Asian women share a common base of fighting, resisting and dissenting against all forms of patriarchal domination, from the domains of the family to that of the state.

References

  1. Abu-Lughod, L. 1990. Can There Be a Feminist Ethnography? Women and Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory 5 (1): 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brewer, J.D. 2000. Ethnography. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chatterji, R. 2012. Speaking with Pictures: Folk Art and the Narrative Tradition in India. Delhi: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Clifford, J., and George E. Marcus. 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dadi, I. 2010. Modernism and the Art of Muslim South Asia. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  6. Desai, D. 2002. The Ethnographic Move in Contemporary Art: What Does It Mean for Art Education? Studies in Art Education 43 (4): 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fine, G.A. 1993. Ten Lies of Ethnography Moral Dilemmas of Field Research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 22 (3): 267–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foster, H. 1999. The Return of the Real. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1988. Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hashmi, S. 2003. Unveiling the Visible: Lives and Works of Women Artists of Pakistan. Lahore: Sang-e-Meel Publications.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2005. Tracing the Image: Contemporary Art in Pakistan. In Art and Social Change: Contemporary Art in Asia and the Pacific, ed. Caroline Turner, 164–179. Canberra: Pandamus Books.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2015. Guerrilla Girls: Feminist Art, Then and Now. http://www.artnowpakistan.com/guerrilla-girls-feminist-art-then-and-now/. Last Accessed on 25 Sept 2018.
  14. Heckman, S. 1997. Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited. Signs 22 (2): 341–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jayawardena, K. 1986. Feminism and Nationalism in the Third World. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  16. Ługowska, A. 2014. The Art and Craft Divide – On the Exigency of Margins. Art Inquiry. Recherches sur les arts XVI: 285–296.Google Scholar
  17. Mohanty, C.T. 1984. Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. Boundary 2 12 (3): 333–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Murthy, L. 2018. Silences and Solidarities: Sexual Violence and Impunity in South Asia. In Another South Asia, ed. Dev Nath Pathak, 125–139. Delhi: Primus Books.Google Scholar
  19. Parker, R. 2010. The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine. New York: I.B. Tauris and Co Ltd.Google Scholar
  20. Pathak, D.N. 2016. Intersections in Sociology, Art and Art History: A Conversation with Parul Dave Mukherji. Conversations on/for South Asia Series. Delhi: Department of Sociology, South Asian University and Aakar Books.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2018. Introduction: On ‘Another’ of ‘South Asia. In Another South Asia, ed. Dev Nath Pathak, 1–25. Delhi: Primus Books.Google Scholar
  22. Pathak, Dev Nath, and Sasanka Perera. 2018. Culture and Politics in South Asia: Performative Politics. Delhi/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Perera, A. 2008. Women Artists in Sri Lanka: Are They Carriers of a Women’s Burden. South Asia Journal for Culture 2: 56–86.Google Scholar
  24. Perera, S. 2012. Introduction. In Artist Remember; Artist Narrate: Memory and Representation in Contemporary Sri Lankan Visual Arts, ed. Sasanka Perera, 11–16. Colombo: Colombo Institute for the Advanced Study of Society and Culture and Theertha International Artists’ Collective.Google Scholar
  25. Peshkin, A. 1988. In Search of Subjectivity—One’s Own. Educational Researcher 17 (7): 17–21.Google Scholar
  26. Pink, S. 2010. Interdisciplinary Agendas in Visual Research: Resituating Visual Anthropology. Visual Studies 18 (2): 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pollock, G. 1987. Feminist Interventions in Art’s Histories. In Vision and Difference: Feminism, Femininity and Histories of Art, 4–14. https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/kb/article/viewFile/10930/4793. Last Accessed on 25 Sept 2018.
  28. Qureshi, I., and N. Khan. 2011. Women Artists and Male Artisans in South Asia. South Asian Popular Culture 9 (1): 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schneider, A. 2008. Three Modes of Experimentation with Art and Ethnography. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 14: 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schrock, R.D. 2013. The Methodological Imperatives of Feminist Ethnography. Journal of Feminist Scholarship 5 (1): 48–60.Google Scholar
  31. Sinha, G. 2016. Making a Subject Space. Art India: The Art News Magazine of India, Quarter 2016, XX (1): 28–37.Google Scholar
  32. Stacey, J. 1988. Can There Be a Feminist Ethnography? Women’s Studies International Forum 11 (1): 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Turner, C. 2005. Art and Social Change: Contemporary Art in Asia and the Pacific. Canberra: Pandamus Books.Google Scholar
  34. Visweswaran, K. 1997. Histories of Feminist Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 591–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weerasinghe, J. 2008. Comfort Zones: Art of Anoli Perera. http://anoliperera.blogspot.in/. Last Accessed on 9 July 2018.
  36. Wolbert, B. 2000. The Anthropologist as Photographer: The Visual Construction of Ethnographic Authority. Visual Anthropology: Published in Cooperation with the Commission on Visual Anthropology 13 (4): 321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zemel, C. 1990. Reviewed Work(s): Vision and Difference: Femininity, Feminism and the Histories of Art by Griselda Pollock. The Art Bulletin 72 (2): 336–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pooja Kalita
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologySouth Asian UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations