Advertisement

IVAVIA: Impact and Vulnerability Analysis of Vital Infrastructures and Built-Up Areas

  • Erich RomeEmail author
  • Oliver Ullrich
  • Daniel Lückerath
  • Rainer Worst
  • Jingquan Xie
  • Manfred Bogen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11260)

Abstract

This paper presents “Impact and Vulnerability Analysis of Vital Infrastructures and Built-up Areas – IVAVIA”, a standardized process for the assessment of climate change-related risks and vulnerabilities in cities and urban environments. IVAVIA consists of seven modules aimed at supporting practitioners and end-users through the risk-based vulnerability assessment process, beginning with a systematic selection of hazards and drivers in their local context, and ending with a standardized presentation of the resulting outcomes to decision makers and stakeholders. IVAVIA offers a set of web-based software tools developed to support end-users executing the IVAVIA process. The paper includes a short summary of a risk-based vulnerability analysis undertaken in the context of the city of Bilbao, Spain.

Keywords

Risk analysis Vulnerability assessment Climate change Critical infrastructure protection 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank their partners in the RESIN consortium for their valuable contributions during the development and test process. This paper is based in part upon work in the framework of the project “RESIN – Climate Resilient Cities and Infrastructures”. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 653522. The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the European Union. Neither the EASME nor the European Commission are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.

We would like to thank Till Below (GIZ) and Stefan Schneiderbauer (Eurac) as representatives of the colleagues in their organizations who have created the “The Vulnerability Sourcebook” in 2014. We are also grateful for the repeated collaboration and exchanges between GIZ, Eurac and Fraunhofer since 2016, which contributed to shaping both the Sourcebook supplement and the IVAVIA Guideline document.

References

  1. 1.
    Rossetti, M.A.: Potential impacts of climate change on railroads. In: Workshop on the Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Transportation, Washington, D.C. (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coletti, A., De Nicola, A., Villani, M.L.: Building climate change into risk assessment. Nat. Hazards 84(2), 1307–1325 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights. United Nations, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development: The Vulnerability Sourcebook. Concept and guidelines for standardised vulnerability assessments. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit, Bonn and Eschborn, Germany (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rome, E., et al.: IVAVIA guideline, annex to deliverable D2.3 realisation and implementation of IVAVIA. EU H2020 Project RESIN, Sankt Augustin, Germany (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    RESIN – Climate Resilient Cities and Infrastructures. http://www.resin-cities.eu/. Accessed 11 Nov 2017
  7. 7.
    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2014. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects, pp. 1–32. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and New York, NY, USA (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    RAMSES – Reconciling adaptation, mitigation and sustainable development for cities. http://www.ramses-cities.eu/. Accessed 05 Dec 2017
  9. 9.
    SMR – Smart Mature Resilience. http://smr-project.eu. Accessed 05 Dec 2017
  10. 10.
    IPCC. Annex II: Glossary, in: Climate Change: Synthesis Report. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 117–130 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction: “National Disaster Risk Assessment”, Words into Action Guidelines, UNISDR (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development: “Risk Supplement to the Vulnerability Sourcebook. Guidance on how to apply the Vulnerability Sourcebook’s approach with the new IPCC AR5 concept of climate risk”, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit, Bonn, Germany (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    German Federal Office of Civil Protection and Disaster Assistance: “Method of Risk Analysis for Civil Protection”. Wissenschaftsforum 8 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pyrko, I., Howick, S., Eden, C.: Risk systemicity and city resilience. In: EURAM 2017. University of Strathclyde, 21–24 June 2017Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction: “Disaster Resilience Scorecard for Cities”, UNISDR (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rome, E., et al.: IVAVIA Guideline – Impact and Vulnerability Analysis of Vital Infrastructures and built-up Areas (plus Appendix). EU H2020 Project RESIN publication, Fraunhofer, Sankt Augustin, Germany, Revision 3.0, 15 June 2018Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lückerath, D., et al.: The RESIN climate change adaptation project and its simple modeling approach for risk-oriented vulnerability assessment. In: Proceedings of ASIM-Workshop STS/GMMS 2018, ARGESIM Report 54, ARGESIM/ASIM Pub., Vienna, Austria, pp. 21–26 (2018)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Neves, A., et al.: The Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy Reporting Guidelines, EUR 28160 EN (2016).  https://doi.org/10.2790/586693
  19. 19.
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. Technical Report, OECD Publishing, Paris (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rome, E., Doll, T., Rilling, S., Sojeva, B., Voß, N., Xie, J.: The use of what-if analysis to improve the management of crisis situations. In: Setola, R., Rosato, V., Kyriakides, E., Rome, E. (eds.) Managing the Complexity of Critical Infrastructures. SSDC, vol. 90, pp. 233–277. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51043-9_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    European Council: Council Directive 2008/114/EC of 8 December 2008: Identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection. Technical report, Official Journal of the European Union, (L 345/75) (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Huizinga, J., de Moel, H., Szewczyk, W.: Global flood depth-damage functions. Methodology and the database with guidelines. EUR 28552 EN (2017).  https://doi.org/10.2760/16510
  23. 23.
    Kok, M., Huizinga, H.J., Vrouwenvelder, A.C.W.M., Barendregt, A.: Standard method 2004. Damage and casualties caused by flooding. Highway and Hydraulic Engineering Department (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erich Rome
    • 1
    Email author
  • Oliver Ullrich
    • 1
  • Daniel Lückerath
    • 1
  • Rainer Worst
    • 1
  • Jingquan Xie
    • 1
  • Manfred Bogen
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraunhofer-Institut für Intelligente Analyse- und Informationssysteme, Schloss BirlinghovenSankt AugustinGermany

Personalised recommendations