Advertisement

Modelling a Continuum of Support

  • Jeanne AllenEmail author
  • Glenda McGregor
  • Donna Pendergast
  • Michelle Ronksley-Pavia
Chapter

Abstract

The Young Adolescent Engagement in Learning (YAEL) Model provides a holistic approach to the provision of support for young adolescent learners. Developed from an extensive review of the international literature, as well as extant student learning support initiatives and strategies for student engagement, the Model represents a unifying framework of best practice approaches, which serves the needs of those working in the fields of student engagement and retention. Development of the Model was also informed by findings from a large research study, including consultations and interviews with a range of key stakeholders, in an Australian educational jurisdiction. This chapter first describes the methodological approach used to develop the Model and then discusses the overarching dimensions that constitute Layer 1 of the Model.

References

  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2011). Basic community profile Australian Capital Territory. http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/communityprofile/8ACTE.
  2. Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). (2012). Junior secondary—Theory and practice. Brisbane, QLD: Queensland Government, Department of Education and Training.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Public Service Commission (APSC). (2007). Tackling wicked problems: A public policy perspective. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government, APSC.Google Scholar
  4. Borgonovi, F., & Pál, J. (2016). A framework for the analysis of student well-being in the PISA 2015 study: Being 15 in 2015 (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 140). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlpszwghvvb-en.
  5. Bridgeland, J. M., Dilulio, J. J., Jr., & Morison, K. B. (2006). The silent epidemic: Perspectives of high school dropouts. Washington, DC: Civic Enterprises.Google Scholar
  6. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Community Services Directorate, ACT Government. (2015). A picture of ACT’s children and young people: Health, wellbeing, learning and development outcomes for children and young people living in the Australian Capital Territory. Canberra, ACT: ACT Government.Google Scholar
  8. Cranston, N., Watson, J., Allen, J. M., Wright, S., Hay, I., Beswick, K., … Kameniar, B. (2016). Overcoming the challenges of keeping young people in education: A wicked problem with implications for leadership, policy and practice. Leading and Managing, 22(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  9. De Jong, T., & Griffiths, C. (2006). The role of alternative education programs in meeting the needs of adolescent students with challenging behaviour: Characteristics of best practice. Australian Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 16(1), 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. (2008). Scoping study into approaches to student wellbeing. Canberra, ACT: Author.Google Scholar
  11. Hay, I., Wright, S., Watson, J., Allen, J. M., Beswick, K., & Cranston, N. (2016). Parent-child connectedness for schooling and students’ performance and aspirations. International Journal of Educational Research, 77, 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mills, M., & McGregor, G. (2010). Re-engaging young people in education: Success factors in alternative schools. Brisbane, QLD: Youth Affairs Network Queensland.Google Scholar
  13. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. Paris, France: Author.Google Scholar
  14. Osher, D., Banks Amos, L., & Gonsoulin, S. (2012). Successfully transitioning youth who are delinquent between institutions and alternative and community schools. https://neglected-delinquent.ed.gov/sites/default/files/docs/successfully_transitioning_youth.pdf.
  15. Pollard, E. L., & Lee, P. D. (2003). Child well-being: A systematic review of the literature. Social Indicators Research, 61(1), 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rudduck, J. (2007). Student voice, student engagement, and school reform. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 587–610). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rumberger, R. W. (2011). Dropping out: Why students drop out of high school and what can be done about it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schnabel, K., Alfeld, C., Eccles, J., Koller, J., & Baumert, J. (2002). Parental influence on students’ educational choices in the United States and Germany: Different ramifications—Same effect? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(2), 178–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shaddock, A., Packer, S., & Roy, A. (2015). Schools for all children and young people: Report of the expert panel on students with complex needs and challenging behaviour. Canberra, ACT: ACT Government, Education and Training Directorate.Google Scholar
  20. Taylor, L., & Parsons, J. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1). https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/745.
  21. Te Riele, K. (2007). Educational alternatives for marginalised youth. Australian Educational Researcher, 34(3), 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Theobald, P. (2009). Education now: How rethinking America’s past can change its future. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Willms, J. D., & Flanagan, P. (2007). Canadian students: Tell them from me. Education Canada, 47(3), 46–50.Google Scholar
  24. Willms, J. D., Friesen, S., & Milton, P. (2009). What did you do in school today? Transforming classrooms through social, academic, and intellectual engagement. Toronto, Canada: Canadian Education Association.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeanne Allen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Glenda McGregor
    • 2
  • Donna Pendergast
    • 3
  • Michelle Ronksley-Pavia
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Education and Professional StudiesGriffith UniversityMt Gravatt, BrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.School of Education and Professional StudiesGriffith UniversityMt Gravatt, BrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.School of Education and Professional StudiesGriffith UniversityMt Gravatt, BrisbaneAustralia
  4. 4.School of Education and Professional StudiesGriffith UniversitySouthportAustralia

Personalised recommendations