On Explanatory Progress

  • C. MantzavinosEmail author
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Philosophy book series (BRIEFSPHILOSOPH)

STUDENT: In the meanwhile, let me say a few more words about the normative side of this philosophical account of explanation—unless you think that we have exhausted the subject?

PHILIP: No, the normative dimension is probably the most important one. I particularly used to like Peter Railton’s notion of an ‘ideal explanatory text’.66

STUDENT: But this is an attempt to establish an eternal standard for judging the quality of explanations. It is so far away from the real-world explanatory practices that is in the end useless!

PHILIP: First of all, ideals need not be useful to be valuable. Further, you can never proceed to the formulation of normative judgments without some kind of an ideal.

STUDENT: You are right, of course, with respect to your first point. Regarding your second point, I would only partly agree: normative guidance is required for any kind of activity and also for explanatory activity. Such guidance can, but need not invoke eternal ideals and even less so single ideals....

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations