Advertisement

Structural Properties of Protein and Their Role in Polymer Nanocomposites

  • Malladi Rajinipriya
  • Florent Gauvin
  • Mathieu Robert
  • Saïd Elkoun
  • Malladi NagalakshmaiahEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The growing concern over the environment raises the question of biodegradability and renewability in numerous fields, including materials and energy. Therefore, industries and researchers focus more on the development of biomaterials generated from natural sources. In this context, proteins and their unique properties made them ideal candidates to be used in different novel applications and are not limited to films, hydrogels, biological tissue engineering, and polymer composites. In this chapter, authors highlight the different sources of protein and their structural properties. Then, the extraction methods are discussed in detail. Further, the different processing methods to prepare the protein-based composites were explained. In overall, this chapter aims to highlight the recent developments of protein-based materials in different fields, based on the literature.

Keywords

Proteins Structural properties Tissue engineering Nanocomposites Hydrogels 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada, the “Centre québecois des matériaux fonctionnels” (CQMF), and the “Consortium de Recherché et Innovations en Bioprocédés Industriels du Québec” (CRIBIQ) of Fonds de recherche du Québec − Nature et technologies (FRQNT).

References

  1. Abou Neel EA, Bozec L, Knowles JC, Syed O, Mudera V, Day R, Hyun JK (2013) Collagen—emerging collagen based therapies hit the patient. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65:429–456.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.08.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altman GH, Diaz F, Jakuba C, Calabro T, Horan RL, Chen J, Lu H, Richmond J, Kaplan DL (2003) Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials 24:401–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Annabi N, Fathi A, Mithieux SM, Weiss AS, Dehghani F (2011) Fabrication of porous PCL/elastin composite scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. J Supercrit Fluids 59:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashok K (2006) Protein biotechnology. Discovery Publishing House, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  5. Aznar-Cervantes S, Roca MI, Martinez JG, Meseguer-Olmo L, Cenis JL, Moraleda JM, Otero TF (2012) Fabrication of conductive electrospun silk fibroin scaffolds by coating with polypyrrole for biomedical applications. Bioelectrochemistry 85:36–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2011.11.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banker GS (1966) Film coating theory and practice. J Pharm Sci 55:81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belgacem MN, Gandini A (eds) (2008) Monomers, polymers and composites from renewable resources, 1st edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  8. Biorad Protein Expression and Purification Series. Introduction to protein purification, recombinant protein expression and purificationGoogle Scholar
  9. Buttafoco L, Engbers-Buijtenhuijs P, Poot AA, Dijkstra PJ, Daamen WF, van Kuppevelt TH, Vermes I, Feijen J (2006a) First steps towards tissue engineering of small-diameter blood vessels: preparation of flat scaffolds of collagen and elastin by means of freeze drying. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 77B:357–368.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buttafoco L, Kolkman NG, Engbers-Buijtenhuijs P, Poot AA, Dijkstra PJ, Vermes I, Feijen J (2006b) Electrospinning of collagen and elastin for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 27:724–734.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.06.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Byrne N, Angell CA (2009) Formation and dissolution of hen egg white lysozyme amyloid fibrils in protic ionic liquids. Chem Commun 1046.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b817590j
  12. Chen ZG, Wang PW, Wei B, Mo XM, Cui FZ (2012) Electrospun collagen–chitosan nanofiber: a biomimetic extracellular matrix for endothelial cell and smooth muscle cell. Acta Biomater 6:372–382.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.07.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen Q, Liang S, Thouas GA (2013) Elastomeric biomaterials for tissue engineering. Prog Polym Sci 38:584–671.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Choi Y, Cho SY, Heo S, Jin H-J (2013) Enhanced mechanical properties of silk fibroin-based composite plates for fractured bone healing. Fibers Polym 14:266–270.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-013-0266-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. da Rocha M, Loiko MR, Gautério GV, Tondo EC, Prentice C (2013) Influence of heating, protein and glycerol concentrations of film-forming solution on the film properties of Argentine anchovy (Engraulis anchoita) protein isolate. J Food Eng 116:666–673.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Daamen WF, Hafmans T, Veerkamp JH, van Kuppevelt TH (1997) Comparison of “ve procedures for the puri” cation of insoluble elastin. Biomaterials 22:2005Google Scholar
  17. DiMarco RL, Heilshorn SC (2012) Multifunctional materials through modular protein engineering. Adv Mater 24:3923–3940.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201200051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elia R et al (2013) Silk–hyaluronan-based composite hydrogels: a novel, securable vehicle for drug delivery. J Biomater Appl 27(6):749–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Food Chemistry (2009) Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. Foss C, Merzari E, Migliaresi C, Motta A (2013) Silk fibroin/hyaluronic acid 3D matrices for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 14:38–47.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm301174xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gennadios A, Brandenburg AH, Weller CL, Testin RF (1993) Effect of pH on properties of wheat gluten and soy protein isolate films. J Agric Food Chem 41:1835–1839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gomes S, Leonor IB, Mano JF, Reis RL, Kaplan DL (2012) Natural and genetically engineered proteins for tissue engineering. Prog Polym Sci 37:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Han J, Lazarovici P, Pomerantz C, Chen X, Wei Y, Lelkes PI (2011) Co-electrospun blends of PLGA, gelatin, and elastin as potential nonthrombogenic scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 12:399–408.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm101149rCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoffman AS (2012) Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:18–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hu J, Chen B, Guo F, Du J, Gu P, Lin X, Yang W, Zhang H, Lu M, Huang Y, Xu G (2012a) Injectable silk fibroin/polyurethane composite hydrogel for nucleus pulposus replacement. J Mater Sci Mater Med 23:711–722.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-011-4533-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hu X, Cebe P, Weiss AS, Omenetto F, Kaplan DL (2012b) Protein-based composite materials. Mater Today 15:208–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huang Y, Zhang B, Xu G, Hao W (2013) Swelling behaviours and mechanical properties of silk fibroin–polyurethane composite hydrogels. Compos Sci Technol 84:15–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jonker AM, Löwik DWPM, van Hest JCM (2012) Peptide- and protein-based hydrogels. Chem Mater 24:759–773.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm202640wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Juncosa-Melvin N, Shearn JT, Boivin GP, Gooch C, Galloway MT, West JR, Nirmalanandhan VS, Bradica G, Butler DL (2006) Effects of mechanical stimulation on the biomechanics and histology of stem cell–collagen sponge constructs for rabbit patellar tendon repair. Tissue Eng 12:2291–2300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Khosravi S, Khabbaz F, Nordqvist P, Johansson M (2010) Protein-based adhesives for particleboards. Ind Crops Prod 32:275–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kozak M (1983) Comparison of initiation of protein synthesis in prokaryotes, eucaryotes, and organellesGoogle Scholar
  32. Kumar R, Choudhary V, Mishra S, Varma IK, Mattiason B (2002) Adhesives and plastics based on soy protein products. Ind Crops Prod 16:155–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kumar BS, Aigal S, Ramesh DV (2012) Air-dried 3D-collagen–chitosan biocomposite scaffold for tissue engineering application. Polym Compos 33(11):2029–2035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lake JA (1983) Ribosome evolution: the structural bases of protein synthesis in archaebacteria, eubacteria, and eukaryotesGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee JM, Kim JH, Lee OJ, Park CH (2013) The fixation effect of a silk fibroin–bacterial cellulose composite plate in segmental defects of the zygomatic arch: an experimental study. JAMA Otolaryngol Neck Surg 139:629–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li G, Liu H, Li T, Wang J (2012a) Surface modification and functionalization of silk fibroin fibers/fabric toward high performance applications. Mater Sci Eng C 32:627–636.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2011.12.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li X, Ma X, Fan D, Zhu C (2012b) New suitable for tissue reconstruction injectable chitosan/collagen-based hydrogels. Soft Matter 8:3781.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2sm06994fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Luo L-H, Zhang Y-F, Wang X-M, Wan Y, Chang PR, Anderson DP, Chen Y (2010) Preparation, characterization, and in vitro and in vivo evaluation of cellulose/soy protein isolate composite sponges. J Biomater Appl 24:503–526.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328208099337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mathew AP, Oksman K, Pierron D, Harmad M-F (2012) Crosslinked fibrous composites based on cellulose nanofibers and collagen with in situ pH induced fibrillation. Cellulose 19:139–150.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9624-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mecham RP (2008) Methods in elastic tissue biology: elastin isolation and purification. Methods 45:32–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.01.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nagalakshmaiah M, El Kissi N, Dufresne A (2016) Ionic compatibilization of cellulose nanocrystals with quaternary ammonium salt and their melt extrusion with polypropylene. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:8755–8764.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b01650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nandane AS, Jain R (2014) Study of mechanical properties of soy protein based edible film as affected by its composition and process parameters by using RSM. J Food Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-014-1417-4
  43. Nishinari K, Fang Y, Guo S, Phillips GO (2014) Soy proteins: a review on composition, aggregation and emulsification. Food Hydrocoll 39:301–318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.01.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peppas NA, Bures P, Leobandung W, Ichikawa H (2000) Hydrogels in pharmaceutical formulations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 50:27–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rnjak J, Li Z, Maitz PKM, Wise SG, Weiss AS (2009) Primary human dermal fibroblast interactions with open weave three-dimensional scaffolds prepared from synthetic human elastin. Biomaterials 30:6469–6477.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rnjak-Kovacina J, Wise SG, Li Z, Maitz PKM, Young CJ, Wang Y, Weiss AS (2012) Electrospun synthetic human elastin:collagen composite scaffolds for dermal tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 8:3714–3722.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shang S, Zhu L, Fan J (2011) Physical properties of silk fibroin/cellulose blend films regenerated from the hydrophilic ionic liquid. Carbohydr Polym 86:462–468.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Silva NHCS, Vilela C, Marrucho IM, Freire CSR, Pascoal Neto C, Silvestre AJD (2014) Protein-based materials: from sources to innovative sustainable materials for biomedical applications. J Mater Chem B 2:3715.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4tb00168kCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Singh P, Kumar R, Sabapathy SN, Bawa AS (2008) Functional and edible uses of soy protein products. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 7:14–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Singh N, Rahatekar SS, Koziol KKK, Ng TS, Patil AJ, Mann S, Hollander AP, Kafienah W (2013) Directing chondrogenesis of stem cells with specific blends of cellulose and silk. Biomacromolecules 14:1287–1298.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm301762pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Skopinska-Wisniewska J, Sionkowska A, Kaminska A, Kaznica A, Jachimiak R, Drewa T (2009) Surface characterization of collagen/elastin based biomaterials for tissue regeneration. Appl Surf Sci 255:8286–8292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.05.127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Steele TWJ, Huang CL, Nguyen E, Sarig U, Kumar S, Widjaja E, Loo JSC, Machluf M, Boey F, Vukadinovic Z, Hilfiker A, Venkatraman SS (2013) Collagen–cellulose composite thin films that mimic soft-tissue and allow stem-cell orientation. J Mater Sci Mater Med 24:2013–2027.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-4940-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Swain SN, Biswal SM, Nanda PK, Nayak PL (2004) Biodegradable soy-based plastics: opportunities and challenges. J Polym Environ 12:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tian H, Zhang L, Wu Q, Wang X, Chen Y (2010) Creation of hydrophobic materials fabricated from soy protein and natural rubber: surface, interface, and properties. Macromol Mater Eng NA-NA.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.200900366
  55. Toldrá F, Nollet LM (eds) (2012) Proteomics in foods: principles and applications. Springer Science & Business Media. http://b-ok.cc/book/2084540/1b3de1
  56. Tsukada S, Nakashima H, Torimitsu K (2012) Conductive polymer combined silk fiber bundle for bioelectrical signal recording. PLoS ONE 7:e33689.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Uriarte-Montoya MH, Arias-Moscoso JL, Plascencia-Jatomea M, Santacruz-Ortega H, Rouzaud-Sández O, Cardenas-Lopez JL, Ezquerra-Brauer JM (2010) Jumbo squid (Dosidicus gigas) mantle collagen: extraction, characterization, and potential application in the preparation of chitosan–collagen biofilms. Biores Technol 101(11):4212–4219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vepari C, Kaplan DL (2007) Silk as a biomaterial. Prog Polym Sci 32:991–1007.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vrhovski B, Weiss AS (1998) Biochemistry of tropoelastin. FEBS J 258:1–18Google Scholar
  60. Wang W, Guo Y, Otaigbe JU (2010) Synthesis, characterization and degradation of biodegradable thermoplastic elastomers from poly(ester urethane)s and renewable soy protein isolate biopolymer. Polymer 51:5448–5455.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2010.09.056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wang X, Shi N, Chen Y, Li C, Du X, Jin W, Chen Y, Chang PR (2012) Improvement in hemocompatibility of chitosan/soy protein composite membranes by heparinization. Biomed Mater Eng 22:143–150Google Scholar
  62. Wang E, Desai MS, Lee S-W (2013a) Light-controlled graphene-elastin composite hydrogel actuators. Nano Lett 13:2826–2830.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl401088bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang Z, Sun X, Lian Z, Wang X, Zhou J, Ma Z (2013b) The effects of ultrasonic/microwave assisted treatment on the properties of soy protein isolate/microcrystalline wheat-bran cellulose film. J Food Eng 114:183–191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Werkmeister JA, Ramshaw JAM (2012) Recombinant protein scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomed Mater 7:012002.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/7/1/012002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yang Z, Xu LS, Yin F, Shi YQ, Han Y, Zhang L, Jin HF, Nie YZ, Wang JB, Hao X, Fan DM, Zhou XM (2012) In vitro and in vivo characterization of silk fibroin/gelatin composite scaffolds for liver tissue engineering: SF/G as liver tissue engineering. J Dig Dis 13:168–178.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2980.2011.00566.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yu L, Ramaswamy HS, Boye J (2012) Twin-screw extrusion of corn flour and soy protein isolate (SPI) blends: a response surface analysis. Food Bioprocess Technol 5:485–497.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-009-0294-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhang L, Zeng M (2008). Proteins as sources of materials. In: Monomers, polymers and composites from renewable resources. pp 479–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Malladi Rajinipriya
    • 1
  • Florent Gauvin
    • 2
  • Mathieu Robert
    • 1
  • Saïd Elkoun
    • 1
  • Malladi Nagalakshmaiah
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Center for Innovation in Technological Eco design (CITE)University of SherbrookeGranbyCanada
  2. 2.Department of the Built EnvironmentEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations