Advertisement

Time Efficient Inspection of Ground Vehicles by a UAV Team Using a Markov Inequality Based Rule

  • Alexey A. Munishkin
  • Dejan MilutinovićEmail author
  • David W. Casbeer
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics book series (SPAR, volume 9)

Abstract

We present a control design for N unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) tasked with a time efficient inspection of M ground moving vehicles. The navigation and intent of each ground vehicle are unknown, therefore, the uncertainty of its navigation has to be anticipated in the navigation of each UAV. We use the minimum time stochastic optimal control to navigate each UAV towards the inspection of ground vehicles. Based on this control, we formulate assignments of ground vehicles to be inspected by UAVs as an optimization problem to inspect all ground vehicles in the minimum expected time. Accounting for ground vehicle uncertain trajectories, we update the optimal assignment by a Markov inequality rule. The rule prevents the possibility of indefinite updating of assignments without finishing the inspection of all vehicles. On the other hand, it updates an assignment if it leads to a statistically significant improvement of the expected time of inspection. The presented approach is illustrated by a numerical example.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, R., Milutinović, D.: A stochastic approach to dubins vehicle tracking problems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 10(59), 2801–2806 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, R.P., Bakolas, E., Milutinović, D., Tsiotras, P.: Optimal feedback guidance of a small aerial vehicle in a stochastic wind. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 36(4), 975–985 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Angelov, P.: Sense and Avoid in UAS: Research and Applications. Wiley (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beard, R.W., McLain, T.W., Goodrich, M.A., Anderson, E.P.: Coordinated target assignment and intercept for unmanned air vehicles. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 18(6), 911–922 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burkard, R., Dell’Amico, M., Martello, S.: Assignment Problems: Revised Reprint. SIAM: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA (2009). Chapter 4: Linear Assignment ProblemGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Choi, J., Milutinović, D.: Tips on stochastic optimal feedback control and bayesian spatio-temporal models: application to robotics. ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 3(137) (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Festa, A., Vinter, R.B.: Decomposition of differential games with multiple targets. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 849–875 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ge, J., Tang, L., Reimann, J., Vachtsevanos, G.: Hierarchical decomposition approach for pursuit- evasion differential game with multiple players. IEEE Aerosp. Conf. (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Getz, W.M., Pachter, M.: Capturability in a Two-Target ‘’Game of Two Cars”. J. Guid. Control 4(1), 15–22 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hashemi, A., Casbeer, D.W., Milutinović, D.: Scalable value approximation for multiple target tail-chase with collision avoidance. In: Proceedings of the 55th IEEE Conference of Decision and Control (CDC) (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Isaacs, R.: Games of Pursuit. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA (1951)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kushner, H.J., Dupuis, P.: Numerical Methods for Stochastic Control Problems in Continuous Time, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, NY, USA (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    LaValle, S.M.: Planning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li Jr., D., Cruz, J.B., Chen, G., Kwan, C., Chang, M.H.: A Hierarchical approach to multi-player pursuit-evasion differential games. In: Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference of Decision and Control (CDC), vol. 44(5), pp. 5674–5679 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Milutinović, D., Casbeer, D.W., Pachter, M.: Markov inequality rule for switching among time optimal controllers in a multiple vehicle intercept problem. Automatica 87, 274–280 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Milutinović, D., Casbeer, D.W., Rasmussen, S., Kingston, D.: A stochastic approach to small UAV feedback control for target tracking and blind spot avoidance. In: Proceedings of the 1st IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA) (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mitchell, I.M., Bayen, A.M., Tomlin, C.J.: A time-dependent Hamilton-Jacobi formulation of reachable sets for continuous dynamic games. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 50(7), 947–957 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Munishkin, A.A., Hashemi, A., Casbeer, D.W., Milutinović, D.: Scalable markov chain approximation for a safe intercept navigation in the presence of multiple vehicles. Autonomous Robots (accepted for publication)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Munishkin, A.A., Milutinović, D., Casbeer, D.W.: Stochastic optimal control navigation with the avoidance of unsafe configurations. In: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS) (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Spivey, M.Z., Powell, W.B.: Dynamic assignment problem. Trans. Sci. 38(4), 399–419 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Von Moll, A., Casbeer, D.W., Garcia, E., Milutinović, D.: Pursuit-Evasion of an Evader by Multiple Pursuers (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexey A. Munishkin
    • 1
  • Dejan Milutinović
    • 1
    Email author
  • David W. Casbeer
    • 2
  1. 1.Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA
  2. 2.Air Force Research Lab, Wright-Patterson AFBControl Science Center of ExcellenceDaytonUSA

Personalised recommendations