Advertisement

Self-assembly in Patterns with Minimal Surprise: Engineered Self-organization and Adaptation to the Environment

  • Tanja Katharina KaiserEmail author
  • Heiko Hamann
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics book series (SPAR, volume 9)

Abstract

For complex and open-ended robot behaviors, it may prove to be important to find an intrinsic driver for pattern formation and self-organization. We apply methods of evolutionary computation and the idea of evolving prediction networks as world models in pair with action-selection networks to implement such a driver, especially in collective robot systems. Giving fitness for good predictions when evolving causes a bias towards easy-to-predict environments and behaviors in the form of emergent patterns, that is, minimal surprise. However, stimulating the emergence of complex behaviors requires to carefully configure allowed actions, sensor models, and the environment. While having shown the emergence of aggregation, dispersion, and flocking before, we increase the scenario’s complexity by studying self-assembly and manage its feasibility by limiting ourselves to a simulated grid world. We observe emergent patterns of self-assembled robots adapted to different environments. Finally, we investigate how minimal surprise can be augmented to engineer self-organization of desired patterns.

Keywords

Self-assembly Evolutionary swarm robotics Pattern formation 

References

  1. 1.
    Bongard, J.C.: Evolutionary robotics. Commun ACM 56(8), 74–83 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borkowski, R., Hamann, H.: Evolving robot swarm behaviors by minimizing surprise: results of simulations in 2-d on a torus. In: Evolving Collective Behaviors in Robotics Workshop, GECCO 2017. pp. 1679–1680. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Der, R., Martius, G.: The playful machine: theoretical foundation and practical realization of self-organizing robots, vol. 15. Springer Science & Business Media (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Friston, K.: The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11(2), 127–138 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Groß, R., Gu, Y., Li, W., Gauci, M.: Generalizing GANs: a turing perspective. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pp. 6319–6329 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hamann, H.: Evolution of collective behaviors by minimizing surprise. In: Sayama, H., Rieffel, J., Risi, S., Doursat, R., Lipson, H. (eds.) 14th International Conference on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems (ALIFE 2014), pp. 344–351. MIT Press (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hamann, H.: Evolving prediction machines: collective behaviors based on minimal surprisal. In: International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (GECCO 2014), pp. 31–32. ACM (2014) [extended abstract]Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hamann, H.: Swarm Robotics: A Formal Approach. Springer (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li, W., Gauci, M., Groß, R.: Turing learning: a metric-free approach to inferring behavior and its application to swarms. Swarm Intell. 10(3), 211–243 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martius, G., Herrmann, J.M.: Taming the beast: guided self-organization of behavior in autonomous robots. In: Doncieux, S., Girard, B., Guillot, A., Hallam, J., Meyer, J.A., Mouret, J.B. (eds.) From Animals to Animals 11, vol. 6226, pp. 50–61. Springer (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nolfi, S., Parisi, D., Elman, J.L.: Learning and evolution in neural networks. Adapt. Behav. 3(1), 5–28 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nolfi, S., Spalanzani, A.: Learning and Evolution: On the Effects of Directional Learning, p. 16 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Radford, A., Metz, L., Chintala, S.: Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. arXiv:1511.06434 (2015)
  14. 14.
    Trianni, V.: Evolutionary Swarm Robotics—Evolving Self-Organising Behaviours in Groups of Autonomous Robots, Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 108. Springer, Berlin, Germany (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zahadat, P., Hamann, H., Schmickl, T.: Evolving Collective Behaviors with Diverse but Predictable Sensor States, vol. 2015, p. 174. MIT Press (2015) [extended abstract]Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zahadat, P., Hamann, H., Schmickl, T.: Evolving diverse collective behaviors independent of swarm density. In: Workshop Evolving Collective Behaviors in Robotics (GECCO 2015), pp. 1245–1246. ACM (2015) [extended abstract]Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Computer EngineeringUniversity of LübeckLübeckGermany

Personalised recommendations