Advertisement

It Seems to Have a Hold on Us: Social Media Self-regulation of Students

  • Lushan Chokalingam
  • Machdel MattheeEmail author
  • Marié J. Hattingh
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 963)

Abstract

Social media play a positive role in the lives of students by providing social networking, communication and information functionalities. However, social media also act as a distraction, resulting in multi-tasking between social media and studying which leaves fragmented time intervals for focused concentration. Self-regulation is emphasized as an essential skill necessary to manage the use of social media when planning or performing learning activities. In this paper we determine whether students are aware of the need for social media self-regulation behavior during their studies and, if so, which measures they take. Some of these include the physical removal of the phone, using technological functions to limit access (e.g. removing the battery, uninstalling apps), or sheer will-power. Nevertheless there remains a strong ‘pulling’ power of social media which makes the implementation of those plans difficult. Reasons for this phenomenon include fear-of-missing-out (FOMO) and the habit-forming nature of social media and mobile devices. Another factor is the two ‘worlds’ of social media as perceived by students: they can be used both academically and socially. How to ignore the one and focus on the other? We emphasise the importance of awareness amongst students and lecturers regarding the need for self-regulation of social media use as well as strategies to manage them.

Keywords

Social media self-regulation Zimmerman Cyclical self-regulation Social media habits Distraction Learning 

References

  1. 1.
    Aagaard, J.: Drawn to distraction: a qualitative study of off-task use of educational technology. Comput. Educ. 87, 90–97 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baumeister, R.F., Vohs, K.D.: Self-regulation, ego depletion, and motivation. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 1(1), 115–128 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    David, P., Kim, J.H., Brickman, J.S., Ran, W., Curtis, C.M.: Mobile phone distraction while studying. New Media Soc. 17(10), 1661–1679 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van den Eijnden, R.J.J.M., Lemmens, J.S., Valkenburg, P.M.: The social media disorder scale. Comput. Hum. Behav. 61, 478–487 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fitzgerald, B., Howcroft, D.: Competing dichotomies in IS research and possible strategies for resolution. In: Proceedings of the international conference on Information systems. ICIS 1998, pp. 155–164 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Lau, W.W.F.: Effects of social media usage and social media multitasking on the academic performance of university students. Comput. Hum. Behav. 68, 286–291 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mao, J.: Social media for learning: a mixed methods study on high school students’ technology affordances and perspectives. Comput. Hum. Behav. 33, 213–223 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nadkarni, A., Hofmann, S.G.: Why do people use Facebook? Personality Individ. Differ. 52(3), 243–249 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oulasvirta, A., Rattenbury, T., Ma, L., Raita, E.: Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 16(1), 105–114 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J.: How do students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman’s cyclical model of self-regulated learning. An. Psicol. 30(2), 450–462 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Przybylski, A.K., Murayama, K., de Haan, C.R., Gladwell, V.: Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(4), 1841–1848 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Rosen, L.D., Carrier, L.M., Cheever, N.A.: Facebook and texting made me do it: media-induced task-switching while studying. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(3), 948–958 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rouis, S., Limayem, M., Salehi-Sangari, E.: Impact of Facebook Usage on Students’ academic achievement: role of self-regulation and trust. Electron. J. Res. Educ. Psychol. 9(3), 961–994 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tamblyn, T.: Hold app cures smartphone addiction by rewarding users with freebies. https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/hold-app-cures-smartphone-addiction-by-rewarding-users-with-freebies_uk_5a97bed7e4b09c872bb14a44 (2018)
  18. 18.
    Terry, C.A., Mishra, P., Roseth, C.J.: Preference for multitasking, technological dependency, student metacognition, and pervasive technology use: an experimental intervention. Comput. Hum. Behav. 65, 241–251 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tess, P.A.: The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual): a literature review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(5), a60–a68 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang, C., Lee, M.K.O., Hua, Z.: A theory of social media dependence: evidence from microblog users. Decis. Support Syst. 69, 40–49 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zimmerman, B.J.: Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theory Into Pract. 41(2), 64–70 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zimmerman, B.J., Moylan, A.R.: Self-regulation: where metacognition and motivation intersect. In: Handbook of Metacognition in Education, pp. 299–316. Routledge (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lushan Chokalingam
    • 1
  • Machdel Matthee
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marié J. Hattingh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations