Advertisement

The Impact of Enterprise Resource Planning Education: A Case Study of the University of Zambia

  • Mampi LubasiEmail author
  • Lisa F. Seymour
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 963)

Abstract

This paper explores the impact that ERP education has on post graduate students taking an ERP course at the University of Zambia using Sen’s capability approach. Through an interpretive case study, capabilities that are enabled by ERP education were identified. We also identified the choices and personal, social and environmental conversion factors that enabled or restricted these capabilities. The choices that impacted the capabilities were that the students were not yet looking for other jobs and they wanted to complete other studies before looking for jobs. Social conversion factors were that the ERP course content does not fit current role, ERP qualification is not valued in the workplace, ERP system is not implemented in the workplace, no role in SAP ERP system in the organisation for IT personnel, hands-on experience from labs, labs lacked an implementation aspect, and a practical local Zambikes case study. Environmental factors were that there are no jobs requiring ERP skills, employers are not aware of ERP graduates in the country and organisations look outside the country For ERP expertise. Universities integrating ERP in their curriculum can benefit from the findings of this paper as it can assist in evaluating the success of ERP education. Employers seeking to hire students with ERP skills can also benefit from this paper as it can assist them in determining how best they can benefit from skills of ERP graduates.

Keywords

ERP education Capabilities Sen’s capability approach 

References

  1. 1.
    Boykin, R.F., Benjamin-Martz, W.: The integration of ERP into a logistics curriculum: applying a systems approach. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 17(1), 45–55 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bradford, M., Vijayaraman, B.S., Chandra, A.: The status of ERP integration in business school curricula: results of a survey of business schools. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 12(1), 26 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Creswell, J.W., Creswell, J.D.: Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2017)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fedorowicz, J., Gelinas, U.J., Usoff, C., Hachey, G.: Twelve tips for successfully integrating enterprise systems across the curriculum. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 15(3), 235 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gigler, B.S.: Including the excluded – can ICTs empower poor communities? Towards an alternative evaluation framework based on the capability approach. In: Proceedings 4th International Conference on the Capability Approach, Pavia (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hatakka, M., Andersson, A., Grønlund, Å.: Students’ use of one to one laptops: a capability approach analysis. Inf. Technol. People 26(1), 94–112 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Henke, P., Seymour, L.F., van Belle, J.P.: Impact of an E-learning initiative in the context of ICT4D: a case study of offering an advanced internet course in underprivileged communities. J. Emerg. Trends Educ. Res. Policy Stud. 5(7), 111 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hepner, M., Dickson, W.: The value of ERP curriculum integration: perspectives from the research. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 24(4), 309 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Klein, H.K., Myers, M.D.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q. 23(1), 67–93 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mahanga, K.M., Seymour, L.F.: Enterprise resource planning Teaching Challenges faced by Lecturers in African Higher Education institutions. In: Proceedings SACLA 2016 CCIS 642, pp. 179–186 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marshall, M.N.: Sampling for qualitative research. Fam. Pract. 13(6), 522–526 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ravesteyn, P., Kohler, A.: Industry participation in educating enterprise resource planning. Commun. IIMA 9(2), 5 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robeyns, I.: The capability approach: a theoretical survey. J. Hum. Dev. 6(1), 93–117 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saito, M.: Amartya Sen’s capability approach to education: a critical exploration. J. Philos. Educ. 37(1), 17–33 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seethamraju, R.: Enterprise systems (ES) software in business school curriculum: evaluation of design and delivery. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 18(1), 69 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., Bondas, T.: Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs. Health Sci. 15(3), 398–405 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Walsham, G.: Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 4(2), 74–81 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations