Performance of Time and Frequency Domain Cluster Solvers Compared to Geophysical Applications
In the framework of frequency-domain full waveform inversion (FWI), we compare the performance of two MPI-based acoustic solvers. One of the solvers is the time-domain solver developed by the SEISCOPE consortium. The other solver is a frequency-domain multifrontal direct solver developed by us. For the high-contrast 3D velocity model, we perform the series of experiments for varying numbers of cluster nodes and shots, and conclude that in FWI applications the solvers complement each other in terms of performance. Theoretically, the conclusion follows from considerations of structures of the solvers and their scalabilities. Relations between the number of cluster nodes, the size of the geophysical model and the number of shots define which solver would be preferable in terms of performance.
KeywordsGeophysical problem 3D acoustic solvers Frequency-domain Time-domain Modeling Sparse matrix Low-rank approximation
We also appreciate KAUST for providing access to Shaheen II supercomputer.
- 1.Aminzadeh, F., Brac, J., Kuntz, T.: 3-D salt and overthrust models. In: SEG/EAGE Modelling Series. SEG Book Series (1997)Google Scholar
- 6.Kostin, V., Solovyev, S., Liu, H., Bakulin, A.: HSS cluster-based direct solver for acoustic wave equation. In: 87th Annual International Meeting, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, pp. 4017–4021 (2017)Google Scholar
- 11.Solovyev, S., Vishnevsky, D., Liu, H.: Multifrontal hierarchically semi-separable solver for 3D Helmholtz problem using optimal 27-point finite-difference scheme. In: 77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition Expanded Abstracts (2015)Google Scholar