Advertisement

The Influence of Temperature and Medium on Corrosion Response of ZE41 and EZ33

  • M. AbdelGawad
  • A. U. Chaudhry
  • B. MansoorEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

Mg-based implants offer a promising alternative to commonly used permanent implants due to their biodegradability that eliminates the need for a follow-up surgery, along with the associated medical and economic risks. Several of the commercial Mg alloys for various applications including potential implant applications contain rare earth elements that are known to improve mechanical strength and corrosion resistance. However, it remains a significant challenge to better understand in vitro corrosion behavior of Mg–RE alloys and predict in vivo behavior, which is useful for biomedical applications, since in vitro corrosion rates tend to be significantly higher than those reported in vivo. In this work, we study the mechanical and corrosion behavior of two Mg–RE alloys, ZE41 and EZ33, at physiologically relevant temperature of 37 °C in 3.5 wt% NaCl and Hank’s solution. Tensile and compression tests were used to evaluate mechanical properties while electrochemical techniques were used to investigate the corrosion response. Both alloys demonstrated improved corrosion resistance in Hank’s solution which was attributed to the formation of a more protective surface film. In addition, the increased RE concentration positively impacted the corrosion behavior of EZ33 compared to ZE41 in both mediums.

Keywords

Mg alloys Corrosion Rare earths Mechanical behavior EIS 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was performed with support from the Qatar Foundation under the National Priorities Research Program grant# NPRP 8-856-2-364. The authors acknowledge this financial support with gratitude.

References

  1. 1.
    Song G, Atrens A. (2003) Understanding Magnesium Corrosion—A Framework for Improved Alloy Performance. Adv Eng Mater 5:837–858.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.200310405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Song GL, Atrens A (1999) Corrosion Mechanisms of Magnesium Alloys. Adv Eng Mater 1:11–33.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1527-2648(199909)1:1%3c11::aid-adem11%3e3.0.co;2-nCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Song G (2005) Recent progress in corrosion and protection of magnesium alloys. Adv Eng Mater 7:563–586.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.200500013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atrens A, Song GL, Cao F, et al (2013) Advances in Mg corrosion and research suggestions. J Magnes Alloy 1:177–200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2013.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    King AD, Birbilis N, Scully JR (2014) Accurate electrochemical measurement of magnesium corrosion rates: A combined impedance, mass-loss and hydrogen collection study. Electrochim Acta 121:394–406.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.12.124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gusieva K, Davies CHJ, Scully JR, Birbilis N (2015) Corrosion of magnesium alloys: the role of alloying. Int Mater Rev 60:169–194.  https://doi.org/10.1179/1743280414y.0000000046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Esmaily M, Svensson JE, Fajardo S, et al (2017) Fundamentals and advances in magnesium alloy corrosion. Prog Mater Sci 89:92–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhao D, Witte F, Lu F, et al (2017) Current status on clinical applications of magnesium-based orthopaedic implants: A review from clinical translational perspective. Biomaterials 112:287–302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen Y, Xu Z, Smith C, Sankar J (2014) Recent advances on the development of magnesium alloys for biodegradable implants. Acta Biomater 10:4561–4573.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Agarwal S, Curtin J, Duffy B, Jaiswal S (2016) Biodegradable magnesium alloys for orthopaedic applications: A review on corrosion, biocompatibility and surface modifications. Mater Sci Eng C 68:948–963.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ding Y, Wen C, Hodgson P, Li Y (2014) Effects of alloying elements on the corrosion behavior and biocompatibility of biodegradable magnesium alloys: a review. J Mater Chem B 2:1912–1933.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3tb21746aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pourbaix M (1974) Atlas of electrochemical equilibria in aqueous solutions. 2nd Eng. ed. by Marcel Pourbaix; translated from the French by James A. Franklin (except sections I, III 5, and III 6, which were originally written in English). Houston, Tex.: National Association of Corrosion Engineers, 1974Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sanchez AHM, Luthringer BJC, Feyerabend F, Willumeit R (2015) Mg and Mg alloys: How comparable are in vitro and in vivo corrosion rates? A review. Acta Biomater 13:16–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tekumalla S, Seetharaman S, Almajid A, et al (2015) Mechanical Properties of Magnesium-Rare Earth Alloy Systems: A Review. Metals (Basel) 5:1–39.  https://doi.org/10.3390/met5010001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sediako D, Bichler L, van Hanegam M, Shook S (2013) Compressive Creep Properties of Wrought High Temperature Magnesium Alloys in Axial and Transverse Orientation—A Neutron Diffraction Study. Magnes Technol 2013 3–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663004Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    AbdelGawad M, Mansoor B, Chaudhry AU (2018) Corrosion Characteristics of Two Rare Earth Containing Magnesium Alloys BT—Magnesium Technology 2018. In: Orlov D, Joshi V, Solanki KN, Neelameggham NR (eds). Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 43–53Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zainal Abidin NI, Martin D, Atrens A (2011) Corrosion of high purity Mg, AZ91, ZE41 and Mg2Zn0.2Mn in Hank’s solution at room temperature. Corros Sci 53:862–872.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2010.10.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zainal Abidin NI, Atrens AD, Martin D, Atrens A (2011) Corrosion of high purity Mg, Mg2Zn0.2Mn, ZE41 and AZ91 in Hank’s solution at 37 °C. Corros Sci 53:3542–3556.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2011.06.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Taltavull C, Shi Z, Torres B, et al (2014) Influence of the chloride ion concentration on the corrosion of high-purity Mg, ZE41 and AZ91 in buffered Hank’s solution. J Mater Sci Mater Med 25:329–345.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-5087-yGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johnston S, Shi Z, Atrens A (2015) The influence of pH on the corrosion rate of high-purity Mg, AZ91 and ZE41 in bicarbonate buffered Hanks’ solution. Corros Sci 101:182–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2015.09.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhao MC, Liu M, Song GL, Atrens A (2008) Influence of pH and chloride ion concentration on the corrosion of Mg alloy ZE41. Corros Sci 50:3168–3178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2008.08.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhao MC, Liu M, Song GL, Atrens A (2008) Influence of microstructure on corrosion of As-cast ZE41. Adv Eng Mater 10:104–111.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.200700246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Siebert-Timmer A, Fletcher M, Bichler L, Sediako D (2013) Creep performance of wrought AX30 and EZ33 magnesium alloys. Can Metall Q 52:430–438.  https://doi.org/10.1179/1879139513y.0000000069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wei LY, Dunlop GL, Westengen H (1997) Solidification behaviour and phase constituents of cast Mg-Zn-misch metal alloys. J Mater Sci 32:3335–3340.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018695927717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Neil WC, Forsyth M, Howlett PC, et al (2011) Corrosion of heat treated magnesium alloy ZE41. Corros Sci 53:3299–3308.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2011.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Neil WC, Forsyth M, Howlett PC, et al (2009) Corrosion of magnesium alloy ZE41—The role of microstructural features. Corros Sci 51:387–394.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2008.11.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Trojanová Z, Lukáč P (2005) Compressive deformation behaviour of magnesium alloys. J Mater Process Technol 162–163:416–421.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kirkland NT, Birbilis N, Staiger MP (2012) Assessing the corrosion of biodegradable magnesium implants: a critical review of current methodologies and their limitations. Acta Biomater 8:925–936.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang J, Jang Y, Wan G, et al (2016) Flow-induced corrosion of absorbable magnesium alloy: in-situ and real-time electrochemical study. Corros Sci 104:277–289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2015.12.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zakiyuddin A, Lee K (2015) Effect of a small addition of zinc and manganese to Mg-Ca based alloys on degradation behavior in physiological media. J Alloys Compd 629:274–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Birbilis N, Easton MA, Sudholz AD, et al (2009) On the corrosion of binary magnesium-rare earth alloys. Corros Sci 51:683–689.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2008.12.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering ProgramTexas A&M University at QatarDohaQatar
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  3. 3.Materials Science and Engineering ProgramTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations