Advertisement

Integrating the Resilience Perspective into the Turkish Planning System: Issues and Challenges

  • Deniz Altay KayaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

Within the last decade, resilience has become both a major planning framework and a development goal for cities and regions facing a plethora of problems in different fields and at different scales. This chapter aims to identify the challenges that await governments when they integrate a resilience thinking framework into their planning systems. The chapter first provides a short explanation on the significance of resilience planning and then outlines a structural model for incorporating the social, economic, political, and institutional requirements in resilience thinking in city and regional planning. Next, the chapter provides a short analysis of the Turkish planning system to reveal its inherent problems and the issues that are likely to be most challenging in a shift towards resilience planning. Finally, based on the provided analyses, the chapter provides a critical discussion on the challenges in operationalizing resilience planning in the Turkish context. The findings reveal that there is a need for restructuring especially in Turkey’s institutional and legislative framework to improve coordination and cooperation, to assure the use of scientific knowledge within the decision-making processes, and to actualize the praxes of participation and engaged governance.

Keywords

Resilience thinking Resilience planning Engaged governance 

References

  1. 3RP (2017) 3RP regional refugee and resilience plan annual report 2016. Available via http://www.3rpsyriacrisis.org/. Accessed 13 Jun 2017
  2. Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24(3):347–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ainuddin S, Routray JK (2012) Community resilience framework for an earthquake prone area in Baluchistan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduction 2:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altay Kaya D, Eraydın A (2013) How do different households respond to inner city urban regeneration projects? the perception of opportunities and risks. Unpublished conference paper. In: Proceedings of the 5th AESOP/ACSP Joint Conference: Planning for Resilient Cities and Regions, Dublin, July 2013. http://aesop-acspdublin2013.com/uploads/files/AESOP-ACSP%20Congress%20Book%20of%20Abstracts.pdf. Accessed 28 Ag 2018
  5. Arnstein S (1969, 2016) A ladder of citizen participation. In: LeGates R, Stout F (eds) The city reader, 6th edn. Routledge, London, pp 279–292Google Scholar
  6. Balsari S et al (2015) Syrian refugee crisis: when aid is not enough. The Lancet.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60168-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bayirbağ MK (2013) Continuity and change in public policy: Redistribution, exclusion and state rescaling in Turkey. Int J Urban Reg Res 37(4):1123–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baud ISA, Hordijk MA (2009) Dealing with risks in urban governace: what can we learn from ‘resilience thinking.’ Available via IFoU. http://newurbanquestion.ifou.org/proceedings/8%20New%20Approaches%20of%20Urban%20Governance/full%20papers/F001%20Baud%20and%20Hordijk%20The%20New%20Urban%20Question.pdf. Accessed 23 Nov 2009
  9. Beatley T (2009) Planning for coastal resilience: best practices for calamitous times. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  10. Berkes F, Ross H (2013) Community resilience: toward an integrated approach. Soc Nat Resour 26(1):5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blaikie P et al (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Bradley D, Grainger A (2004) Social resilience as a controlling influence on desertification in Senegal. Land Degrad Dev 15:451–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buikstra E et al (2010) The components of resilience: perceptions of an Australian rural community. J. Commun Psychol 38:975–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carpenter S et al (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4:765–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caymaz E et al (2013) A model proposal for efficient disaster: the Turkish sample. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 99:609–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cote M, Nightingale AJ (2012) Resilience thinking meets social theory: situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research. Prog Hum Geogr 36(4):475–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chmutina K et al (2016) Unpacking resilience policy discourse. Cities 58:70–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cretney R (2014) Resilience for whom? Emerging critical geographies of socio-ecological resilience. Geography Compass 8(9):627–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cutter SL et al (2008) A place-based model for understanding community resilence to natural disasters. Glob Environ Change 18(4):598–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cutter SL et al (2010) Disaster resilience indicators for bench-marking baseline conditions. J Homel Secur Emerg Manage 7(1).  https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1732
  21. Cuthill M (2010) Strengthening the ‘social’ in sustainable development: developing a conceptual framework for social sustainability in a rapid urban growth region in Australia. Sustain Dev 18(6):362–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duyguluer F (2012) Turkish spatial planning practice in the neoliberal era: over-fragmentation. Unpublished master thesis, METUGoogle Scholar
  23. Eraydın A (2013) ”Resilience Thinking” for planning. In: Eraydın A, Taşan-Kok T (eds) Resilience thinking in urban planning. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 17–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eraydın A, Taşan-Kok T (2013) Introduction: resilience thinking in urban planning. In: Eraydın A, Taşan-Kok T (eds) Resilience thinking in urban planning. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Foster KA (2007) A case study approach to understanding regional resilience. Available via UC Berkeley IURD working Paper Series. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8tt02163. Accessed: 20 Nov 2017
  26. Gabiam N (2016) Humanitarianism, development, and security in the 21st century: Lessons from the Syrian refugee crisis. Int J Middle East Stud 48.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743816000131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gonzalez G (2016) New aid architecture and resilience building around the Syria crisis. http://www.fmreview.org/solutions/gonzalez.html. Accessed 11 Nov 2017
  28. Grüneward F, Warner J (2012) Resilience: buzz word or useful concept? http://www.urd.org/RESILIENCE-buzz-word-or-useful. Accessed: 30 Jan 2017
  29. Gunderson LH (2000) Ecological resilience – in theory and application. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31(1):425–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Güzey Ö (2016) The last round in restructuring the city: urban regeneration becomes a state policy of disaster prevention in Turkey. Cities 50:40–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Rev of Eco Sys 4:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Holling CS (1992) Cross-scale morphology, geometry and dynamics of ecosystems. Ecol Mongr 62:447–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holling CS (1986) The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change. In: Clark WC, Munn RE (eds) Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 292–317Google Scholar
  34. ICLEI (2018) Resilient city. http://www.iclei.org/activities/agendas/resilent-city.html. Accessed 30 Mar 2018
  35. Karlsen J (2010) Regional complexity and the need for engaged governance. EKONOMIAZ 74(2):36–55Google Scholar
  36. Kulig JC (2000) Community resiliency: the potential for community health nursing theory development. Public Health Nurs 17:374–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kulig JC et al (2008) Understanding community resiliency in rural communities through multimethod research. Available via ULeth. http://hdl.handle.net/10133/1265. Accessed 28 Jul 2017
  38. Lebel L et al (2006) Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 11(1): 19. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art19/. Accessed 25 May 2018
  39. Lu P, Stead D (2013) Understanding the notion of resilience in spatial planning: a case study of Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Cities 35:200–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maclean K et al (2014) Six attributes of social resilience. J Environ Plan Man 57(1):144–156.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2013.763774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maguire B, Cartwright S (2008) Assessing a community’s capacity to manage change: a resilience approach to social assessment. Available via Australian Government Bureau of Rural Sciences. http://www.tba.co.nz/tba-eq/Resilience_approach.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2016
  42. Marshall NA (2010) Understanding social resilence to climate variability in primary enterprises and industries. Glob Environ Change 20:36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marshall NA (2007) Can policy perception influence social resilence to policy change? Fish Res 86:216–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marshall NA et al (2007) How resource dependency can influence social resilence within a primary resource industry. Rural Sociol 72(3):359–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mayunga JS (2007) Understanding and applying the concept of community disaster resilience: a capital-based approach. A draft working paper prepared for social vulnerability and resilience building, Munich, Germany. https://www.u-cursos.cl/usuario/3b514b53bcb4025aaf9a6781047e4a66/mi_blog/r/11. _Joseph _S._Mayunga.pdf. Accessed 28 Ag 2018
  46. Meerow S et al (2016) Defining urban resilience: a review. Landscape and Ur Plan 147:38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ministry of Environment and Urbanization (2017) Şehircilik Şurası Komisyon Raporları Ekim 2017. https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/sehirciliksurasi/editordosya/Sura2017komisyon%20raporu.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
  48. Nelson DR et al (2007) Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a resilience framework. Ann Rev Env Resou 32:395–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. New Urban Agenda (2016) Habitat III, Quito declaration. http://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/NUA-English.pdf. Accessed 28 Ag 2018
  50. Norris FH (2008) Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capabilities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Commun Psychol 41:127–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Paton D, Johnston D (2001) Disasters and communities: vulnerability, resilience and preparedness. Disaster Prev Manage 10(4):270–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Paton D et al (2001a) Responding to hazard effects: promoting resilience and adjustment adoption. Aust J Emerg Manage 2001:47–52Google Scholar
  53. Paton D et al (2001b) Community resilience to volcanic consequences. Nat Hazards 24:157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pelling M (2003) The vulnerability of cities: natural disasters and social resilience. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Penpecioğlu M (2011) Kapitalist kentleşme dinamiklerinin Türkiye’deki son 10 yılı: Yapılı çevre üretimi, devlet ve büyük ölçekli kentsel projeler. Birikim 270:62–73Google Scholar
  56. Resilience Alliance (2007). A research prospectus for urban resilience: a resilience alliance ini-tiative for transitioning urban systems towards sustainable futures. http://www.resalliance.org. Accessed 09 Sep 2009
  57. Ross H et al (2010) Understanding, enhancing and managing for social resilence at the regional scale: Opportunities in North Queensland. http://www.rrrc.org.au/publications/social_resilience_northqueensland.html. Accessed 10 Apr 2018
  58. Scoones I (2005) Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper 72 http://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/3390. Accessed 26 Ag 2011
  59. Şenol Balaban M (2016) An assessment of flood risk factors in riverine cities of Turkey: Lessons for resilience and urban planning. METU J Fac Archit 33(2):45–71Google Scholar
  60. Taşan-Kok T et al (2010) Shifting from sustainability to resilience? Planning strategies, climate change and flood risk in Rotterdam. Unpublished conference paper. In: 24th AESOP Annual Conference, Finland, July 2010Google Scholar
  61. Taşan-Kok T et al (2013) Conceptual overview of resilience: history and context. In: Eraydın A, Taşan-Kok T (eds) Resilience thinking in urban planning. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 39–51Google Scholar
  62. Türkün A (2011) Urban regeneration and hegemonic power relationships. Int Plan Stud 16(1):61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Türkün A et al (2014) 1980’ler sonrasında Istanbu’da kentsel dönüşüm: mevzuat, söylem, aktörler ve dönüşümün hedefindeki alanlar. In: Türkün A (ed) Mülk mahal insan: Istanbul’da kentsel dönüşüm. Bilgi Yayınları, İstanbul, pp 79–140Google Scholar
  64. Walker BH et al (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability: social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2): 5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5. Accessed 1 Nov 2010
  65. Walker BH et al (2006) A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 11(1): 13. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art13/. Accessed 2 Nov 2010
  66. Wagenaar H, Wilkinson C (2015) Enacting resilience: a performative account of governing for urban resilience. Urban stud 52(7):1265–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of City and Regional PlanningCankaya UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations