Analysis of Rheological Behavior by the Method Squeeze Flow in Mortars Incorporated with Ornamental Stone Residue

  • G. C. M. AzevedoEmail author
  • P. I. Moreira
  • L. F. Ciribelli
  • G. C. Xavier
  • J. Alexandre
  • A. R. G. Azevedo
  • S. N. Monteiro
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)


The objective of this study was the analysis of the multiple use mortars incorporated to the ornamental stone residue (OSR), in the city of Santo Antônio de Pádua/RJ. The squeeze flow method was used to understand its main rheological characteristics. This process was performed by replacing sand by the stone residue in the percentages of 10, 15 and 20%, including Portland cement of type CP II and type CP III. In this way, the wide range of consistency, as well as, the influence of speeds proposed by the method squeeze flow, the influence of the rock residue and the influence of the mentioned cements were analyzed.


Ornamental stone residue Mortar Fluid state 


  1. 1.
    Moreira JMS, Manhães JPVT, Holanda JNF (2005) Reutilization of ornamental from the Fluminense Northwest in red ceramics. Ceramics 51:180–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    de Eduardo Augusto C et al (2002) Use of fine residues from the sawmills of Santo Antônio de Pádua/RJ. In: III symposium of Northeastern ornamental stones—SRONE, p 1–8Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brazilian Association of Technical Standards—ABNT (Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas) (2005) NBR 13276: Mortars for laying and coating of walls and ceilings—Preparation of the mixture and determination of the consistency index. Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brazilian Association of Technical Standards—ABNT (Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas) (2010) NBR 15839: Mortars for laying and coating of walls and ceilings—Rheological by the squeeze flow method. Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cardoso F, John VM, Pileggi RG (2009) Rheological behavior of mortars under different squeezing rates. Cem Res 39:748–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stolz CM, Masuero AB, Pagnussat DT, Kirchheim AP (2016) Influence of substrate texture on the tensile and shear bond of rendering mortars. Constr Build Mater 128:298–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mattana AJ, Pereira E, da Costa MRMM (2013) Influence of coating constituents on their rheological. UEPG, Ciências Exatas e da Terra, Ponta Grossa, vol 19, pp 33–44Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cardoso F, John VM, Pileggi RG, Banfill PFG (2013) Characterisation of rendering mortars by squeeze-flow and rotational rheometry. Cem Res 57:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Costa EBC, Antunes RPN, Pileggi RG, John VM (2010) Evaluation of the effect of rheology and on . 3ª Congresso Português de argamassas de construçãoGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Azevedo ARG, Alexandre J, Zanelato EB, Marvila MT (2017) Influence of incorporation of glass on the rheological of adhesive. Construct Build Mater 148:359–368Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. C. M. Azevedo
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. I. Moreira
    • 2
  • L. F. Ciribelli
    • 2
  • G. C. Xavier
    • 2
  • J. Alexandre
    • 2
  • A. R. G. Azevedo
    • 3
    • 4
  • S. N. Monteiro
    • 5
  1. 1.FASAP - Sr. Anthony’s College of PaduaSanto Antônio de Pádua, Rio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.LECIV – Civil Engineering LaboratoryUENF - State University of the Northern Rio de JaneiroCampos dos Goytacazes, Rio de JaneiroBrazil
  3. 3.TER – Department of Agricultural Engineering and EnvironmentUFF - Federal Fluminense UniversityNiterói, Rio de JaneiroBrazil
  4. 4.DIRINF – Directorate of Infrastructure RectoryIFF - Federal Institute FlumineseCampos Dos Goytacazes, Rio de JaneiroBrazil
  5. 5.Department of Materials ScienceIME - Military Institute of EngineeringRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations