Advertisement

Reliability Increasing of an Estimation of Rocks Strength by Non-destructive Methods of Acoustic Testing Due to Additional Informative Parameters

  • A. S. VoznesenskiiEmail author
  • M. N. Krasilov
  • Ya. O. Kutkin
  • M. N. Tavostin
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

Forecasting the strength of rocks by non-destructive methods is a way of assessing the stability of the rock mass in the vicinity of underground excavations, quarries and wells. Regression relationships between rock strength and the velocities of longitudinal and transverse elastic waves are widely used in practice for the evaluation of strength. However, these velocities are insensitive and uninformative in the initial stages of crack development and in cases where the rock is formed from multiple components; this leads to a decrease in the reliability of the strength assessment. Using other informative parameters that characterise signal loss (such as the damping coefficients of elastic waves in the rock, acoustic quality factors, etc.) can increase measurement reliability. This report presents the results of laboratory investigations into the dependencies between the longitudinal and transverse wave velocities, the acoustic quality factor (Q factor) and the tensile strength during bending tests carried out on dolomites from the Genaldon Deposit and the gypsum-containing rocks of the Novomoskovsk Deposit. The possibility of their practical application in the evaluation of rock strength using the velocities of elastic waves and other informative parameters is discussed.

Keywords

Rock Dolomite Gypsum Strength Acoustic Properties Predicting Regression NDT Q factor 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been carried out under the auspices of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Grant No. 17-05-00570, and with financial support from the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation in the framework of increase Competitiveness Program of NUST ‘‘MISIS”, implemented by a governmental decree dated 16th of March 2013, No. 211. We express our gratitude to unknown reviewers for their attentive reading of the manuscript and valuable remarks.

References

  1. 1.
    Umrao RK, Sharma LK, Singh R, Singh TN (2018) Determination of strength and modulus of elasticity of heterogenous sedimentary rocks: an ANFIS predictive technique. Measurement 126:194–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.05.064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Matin SS, Farahzadi L, Makaremi S, Chelgani SC, Sattari G (2018) Variable selection and prediction of uniaxial compressive strength and modulus of elasticity by random forest. Appl Soft Comput 70:980–987.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ündül Ö, Er S (2017) Investigating the effects of micro-texture and geo-mechanical properties on the abrasiveness of volcanic rocks. Eng Geol 229:85–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.09.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    El-Sherbiny SMM, Hassanin AGG, Nofal HAA, Abd-Alkader SMM (2003) Ultrasonic attenuation measurements in Egyptian dry compact rocks, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., p B51–57.  https://doi.org/10.1109/nrsc.2003.1217316
  5. 5.
    Ma R, Ba J, Wang E, Zhao H, Qian W, Yu C (2017) Experimental analysis on P-wave attenuation in tight oil rocks. In: 79th EAGE Conference Exhibition, European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers, EAGE (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rao MV, Prasanna Lakshmi KJJ (2003) Shear-wave propagation in rocks and other lossy media: an experimental study. Curr Sci 85:1221–1225Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hennah SJJ, Astin TRR, Sothcott J, McCann C (2003) Relationships between rock heterogeneity, attenuation and velocity dispersion at ultrasonic and sonic frequencies, vol 22. Society of exploration geophysicists.  https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1817619
  8. 8.
    Guo MQM-Q, Fu LYL-Y, Ba J (2009) Comparison of stress-associated coda attenuation and intrinsic attenuation from ultrasonic measurements. Geophys J Int 178:447–456.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04159.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Voznesenskii AS, Krasilov MN, Kutkin Y, Koryakin VV (2018) On the evaluation of rock integrity around mine workings with anchorage by the shock-spectral method. Int J Fatigue 113(8):438–444.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.01.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Voznesenskii AS, Kutkin YO, Krasilov MN, Komissarov AA (2016) The influence of the stress state type and scale factor on the relationship between the acoustic quality factor and the residual strength of gypsum rocks in fatigue tests. Int J Fatigue 84:53–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.11.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Voznesenskii AS, Krasilov MN, Kutkin YO, Tavostin MN, Osipov YV (2017) Features of interrelations between acoustic quality factor and strength of rock salt during fatigue cyclic loadings. Int J Fatigue 97:70–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.12.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Voznesensky AS, Kutkin YO, Krasilov MN (2015) Interrelation of the acoustic Q-factor and strength in limestone. J Min Sci 51(1):23–30.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739115010044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Voznesenskii AS, Kutkin YO, Krasilov MN, Komissarov AA (2015) Predicting fatigue strength of rocks by its interrelation with the acoustic quality factor. Int J Fatigue 77:194–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.02.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    GOST 30629-99. Materialy i izdeliya oblicovochnye iz gornyh porod. Metody ispytanij. Mezhgosudarstvennyj standart. Data vvedeniya 2001-01-01. M.: Gosstroj Rossii.–2000.–71 s. (Materials: rocks. Test method. Interstate standard. Date of introduction 2001-01-01. M.: Gosstroy Of Russia, in Russian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. S. Voznesenskii
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. N. Krasilov
    • 1
  • Ya. O. Kutkin
    • 1
  • M. N. Tavostin
    • 1
  1. 1.The National University of Science and Technology MISiSMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations