Advertisement

Modeling on the Two-Phase Flow in a Slab Continuous Casting Strand Using Euler–Euler Approach

  • Haichen Zhou
  • Lifeng ZhangEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

The stability of flow field in the mold has a great effect on the quality of the final continuous casting product. In the current study, the multiphase flow in a slab continuous casting strand was systematically studied using a full scale numerical simulation via Euler–Euler approach, and the effect of the operational parameters including casting speed, gas flow rate, and the submergence depth of the submerged entry nozzle (SEN) was investigated. The study showed that the lower casting speed tended to generate more single roll flow in the strand. With the decrease in the gas flow rate, the flow pattern was evolved from a single roll to a complex flow and then to a double roll. For a fixed gas flow rate and a fixed casting speed, the deeper submergence depth generated more double roll pattern in the strand.

Keywords

Continuous casting Flow pattern Multiphase flow Euler–Euler approach Nail board experiment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the support from the National Science Foundation China (Grant No. U1860206), the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFB0304001). Beijing Key Laboratory of Green Recycling and Extraction of Metals (GREM) and the High Quality Steel Consortium (HQSC) and Green Process Metallurgy and Modeling (GPM2) at the School of Metallurgical and Ecological Engineering at University of Science and Technology Beijing (USTB), China.

References

  1. 1.
    Nakato H, Ozawa M, Kinoshita K, Habu Y, Emi T (1984) Factors affecting the formation of shell and longitudinal cracks in mold during high speed continuous casting of slabs. Trans ISIJ 24(11):957–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mcdavid RM, Thomas BG (1996) Flow and thermal behavior of the top surface flux/powder layers in continuous casting molds. Metall Mater Trans B. 27(4):672–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Emling WH, Waugaman TA, Feldbauer SL, Cramb AW (1994) Subsurface mold slag entrainment in ultra low carbon steels. In: Steelmaking conference proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Knoepke J, Hubbard M, Kelly J, Kittridge R, Lucas J (1994) Pencil blister reductions at inland steel company. In: Steelmaking conference proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kasai N, Mizukami H, Mutou A (2003) State of segregation with bubble in continuously cast slab of ultra low carbon steel. Tetsu-to-Hagane 89(11):1120–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thomas BG, Huang X, Sussman RC (1994) Simulation of argon gas flow effects in a continuous slab caster. Metall Mater Trans B 25(4):527–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kubo N, Ishii T, Kubota J, Aramaki N (2002) Two-phase flow numerical simulation of molten steel and argon gas in a continuous casting mold. ISIJ Int 42(11):1251–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yuan Q, Thomas BG, Vanka SP (2004) Study of transient flow and particle transport in continuous steel caster molds: Part I. Fluid flow. Metall Mater Trans B. 35(4):685–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu R, Thomas BG, Sengupta J, Chung SD, Trinh MK (2014) Measurements of molten steel surface velocity and effect of stopper-rod movement on transient multiphase fluid flow in continuous casting. ISIJ Int 54(10):2314–2323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ávila-Ortiz Y, Morales MD, Cedillo-Hernández V, Delgado-Pureco J (2018) Mathematical modeling of argon bubbling effects on fluid flow patterns of liquid steel in a slab mold. Steel Res Int 89(5)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morales RD, Ortiz-Avila Y (2017) Fundamentals of scale up procedures to model liquid steel-argon flows in slab molds. In: The international conference on modeling and simulation of metallurgical processes in steelmakingGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Andrzejewski P, Kohler KU, Pluschkell W (1992) Model investigations on the fluid flow in continuous casting moulds of wide dimensions. Steel Res 63(6):242–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Metallurgical and Ecological EngineeringUniversity of Science and Technology Beijing (USTB)BeijingChina
  2. 2.Beijing Key Laboratory of Green Recycling and Extraction of MetalUniversity of Science and Technology Beijing (USTB)BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations