Advertisement

Dynamic Current and Power Distributions in a Submerged Arc Furnace

  • Y. A. TesfahunegnEmail author
  • T. Magnusson
  • M. Tangstad
  • G. Saevarsdottir
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

Most submerged arc furnaces used for the production of ferroalloys run on three-phase alternating current. This affects the electrical operation of the furnace and thus it is of interest to study alternating current distributions in the system. This work presents computations of alternating electric current distributions inside an industrial submerged arc furnace for silicon production. A 3D model has been developed in ANSYS Maxwell using the eddy current solver. In each phase, electrode, central arc, crater, crater wall and side arcs that connect electrode and crater wall are taken into account. In this paper, the dynamic current distributions in different parts of the furnace, as well as skin and proximity effects in and between electrodes are presented. Moreover, active and reactive power distributions in various components of the furnace are quantified.

Keywords

Current distribution Current paths Power distributions Submerged arc furnace 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Icelandic Technology development fund is greatly acknowledged for their funding of this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Sævarsdottir GA, Bakken JA, Sevastyanenko VG, Liping Gu (2011) High power ac arcs in metallurgical furnaces. High Temp Mater Processes 15(3)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saevarsdottir GA, Bakken JA (2010) Current distribution in submerged arc furnaces for silicon metal/ferrosilicon production. In: Proceedings INFACON12Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tranell G, Andersson M, Ringdalen E, Ostrovski O, Stenmo JJ (2010) Reaction zones in a FeSi75 furnace—results from an industrial excavation. In: INFACON XII, pp 709–715Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Myrhaug EH (2003) Non-fossil reduction materials in the silicon process -properties and behavior. Ph.D. thesis, NTNUGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tangstad M, Ksiazek M, Andersen JE (2014) Zones and materials in the Si furnace. In: Proceedings: Silicon for the chemical and solar industry XII, Trondheim, Norway, June, pp 24–27Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krokstad M (2014) Electrical resistivity of industrial SiC crusts. M.Sc. thesis, NTNUGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vangskåsen J (2012) Metal-producing mechanisms in the carbothermic silicon process. M.Sc. thesis, NTNUGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mølnås H (2010) Investigation of SiO condensate formation in the silicon process, Project report in TMT 4500. NTNU, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nell J, Joubert C (2013) Phase chemistry of digout samples from a ferrosilicon furnace. In: Infacon prceedings KazakhstanGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tesfahunegn YA, Magnusson T, Tangstad M, Saevarsdottir G (2018) Effect of electrode shape on the current distribution in submerged arc furnaces for silicon production—A modelling approach. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 118(6):595–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tesfahunegn, YA, Magnusson, T, Tangstad, M, Saevarsdottir, G (2018) Effect of carbide configuration on the current distribution in submerged arc furnaces for silicon production—A modelling approach. In: Nastac L, Pericleous K, Sabau A, Zhang L, Thomas B (eds) CFD modeling and simulation in materials processing 2018. TMS 2018. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham, pp 175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tesfahunegn, YA, Magnusson, T, Tangstad, M, Saevarsdottir, G (2018) Dynamic current distribution in the electrodes of submerged arc furnace using scalar and vector potentials. In: Shi Y et al (eds) Computational science—ICCS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10861. Springer, Cham, pp 518–527Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tesfahunegn, YA, Magnusson, T, Tangstad, M, Saevarsdottir, G (2018) The effect of frequency on current distributions inside submerged arc furnace. In: Paper presented at the IEEE MTT-S international conference on numerical and electromagnetic and multiphysics modeling and optimization. Reykjavik, Iceland, 08–11 Aug 2018Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Herland EV, Sparta M, Halvorsen SA (2018) 3D models of proximity effects in large FeSi and FeMn furnaces. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 118(6):607–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dhainaut M (2004) Simulation of the electric field in a submerged arc furnace. In: INFACON X, pp 605–613Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bezuidenhout JJ, Eksteen JJ, Bardshaw SM (2009) Computational fluid dynamic modelling of an electric furnace used in the smelting of PGM containing concentrates. Miner Eng 22:995–1006.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2009.03.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Darmana D, Olsen JE, Tang K, Ringldalen E (2012) Modelling concept for submerged arc furnaces. In: Paper presented at the ninth international conference on CFD in the minerals and process industries CSIRO. Melbourne, Australia, 10–12 DecGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang Z, Fu Y, Wang N, Feng L (2014) 3D numerical simulation of electrical arc furnaces for the MgO production. J Mater Process Technol 214:2284–2291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.04.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maxwell, ver. 18.0 (2018) ANSYS Inc., Southpointe, 275 technology drive, Canonsburg, PA 15317Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saevarsdottir G, Bakken J, Sevastyanenko V, Liping G (2011) High power ac arcs in metallurgical furnaces. High Temp Mater Processes 15(3)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schei A, Tuset JK, Tveit H (1998) Production of high silicon alloys. Tapir Forlag, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sævarsdottir GA (2002) High current ac arcs in silicon and ferrosilicon furnaces. Ph.D. thesis, NTNUGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sasaki H, Ikari A, Terashima K, Kimura S (1995) Temperature dependence of the electrical resistivity of molten silicon. Jpn J Appl Phys.  https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.34.3426CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. A. Tesfahunegn
    • 1
    Email author
  • T. Magnusson
    • 2
  • M. Tangstad
    • 3
  • G. Saevarsdottir
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Science and EngineeringReykjavik UniversityReykjavikIceland
  2. 2.United SiliconReykjanesbæIceland
  3. 3.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations