Advertisement

Bonhoeffer pp 167-188 | Cite as

Bonhoeffer in a Crisis-World

  • Petra Brown
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter turns away from the exegetical and argumentative tasks of the previous chapters in the book. It looks at Bonhoeffer’s own intellectual and theological formation in the context of post-war Weimar Germany, through examining the debates between key intellectual figures of the Weimar Republic, and Bonhoeffer’s place in this. By situating Bonhoeffer in the context of his peers, this chapter seeks to illuminate the ‘crisis’ thinking that pervaded the interwar years, and influenced Bonhoeffer’s own theology, and highlights the danger of too readily invoking crisis language.

References

  1. Arendt, Hannah. 1994. Essays in Understanding: 1930–1954. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bambach, Charles R. 1995. Heidegger, Dilthey, and the Crisis of Historicism. New York and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barth, Karl. 1928. The Word of God and the Word of Man, trans. Douglas Horton. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
  4. Barth, Karl. 1968. The Epistle to the Romans, trans. Edwyn C. Hoskyns. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bethge, Eberhard. 1977. Dietrich Bonhoeffer: Theologian, Christian, Contemporary, trans. Eric Mosbacher, Peter and Betty Ross, Frank Clarke, and William Glen-Doepel. London: Fountain Books.Google Scholar
  6. Bullivant, Keith. 1985. The Conservative Revolution. In The Weimar Dilemma: Intellectuals in the Weimar Republic, ed. Anthony Phelan, 47–71. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Burkhard, Conrad. 2009. Kierkegaard’s Moment: Carl Schmitt and his Historical Concept of Decision. In Redescriptions: Yearbook of Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, 145–171. Berlin: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Collegeville Institute. 2018. Theology in Uncertain Times: An Interview with Bonhoeffer Scholar Victoria J. Barnett. Bearings Online. https://collegevilleinstitute.org/bearings/theology-in-uncertain-times/. Accessed 10 Nov 2018.
  9. Dorrien, Gary. 2000. The Barthian Revolt in Modern Theology. Kentucky: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
  10. Durst, David C. 2004. Weimar Modernism: Philosophy, Politics, and Culture in Germany 1918–1933. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  11. Encyclopedia, New World. 2017. Hans Kelsen. http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/p/index.php?title=Hans_Kelsen&oldid=1005846. Accessed 7 Sept 2018.
  12. Floyd, Wayne Whitson, Jr. 2009. Editor’s Introduction to the English Edition. In Act and Being, ed. Wayne Whitson Floyd Jr., 1–24. Dietric Bonhoeffer Works English. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  13. Frend, W.H.C. 2001. Church Historians of the Early Twentieth Century: Adolf von Harnack (1851–1930). The Journal of Ecclesiastical History 52 (1): 83–102.Google Scholar
  14. Friedman, Michael. 2018. Ernst Cassirer. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab.Google Scholar
  15. Gordon, Peter Eli. 2003. Rosenzweig and Heidegger: Between Judaism and German Philosophy. Ewing, NJ: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gordon, Peter E. 2008. Neo-Kantianism and the Politics of Enlightenment. Philosophical Forum 39 (2): 223–238.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9191.2008.00292.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gordon, Peter Eli. 2010. Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Green, Clifford J. 2009. Editor’s Introduction to the English Edition. In Sanctorum Communio: A Theological Study of the Sociology of the Church, ed. Clifford J. Green. Dietrich Bonhoeffer Works English. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  19. von Harnack, Adolf. 1989. Adolf von Harnack: Liberal Theology at Its Height. London: Collins.Google Scholar
  20. Heidegger, Martin. 1990. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 4th ed. Indianapolis: Indiania University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Heis, Jeremy. 2018. Neo-Kantianism. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University: Metaphysics Research Lab.Google Scholar
  22. Henig, Ruth. 1998. Weimar Republic, 1919–1933. London, GBR: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Howard, Albert. 2006. Protestant Theology and the Making of the Modern German University. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hunter, Ian. 2001. Rival Enlightenment: Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in Early Modern Germany. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huntington, Patricia J. 1995. Heidegger’s Reading of Kierkegaard Revisited: From Ontological Abstraction to Ethical Concretion. In Kierkegaard in Post/Modernity, ed. Martin Beck Matuštík and Merold Westphal, 43–65. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Jabloner, Clemens. 2000. Hans Kelsen. In Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis, ed. Arthur J. Jacobson and Bernhard Schlink, 67–109. Philosophy, Social Theory, and the Rule of Law, vol. 8. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Malik, Habib C. 1997. Receiving Soren Kierkegaard: The Early Impact and Transmission of His Thought. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
  28. McCormack, Bruce L. 1995. Karl Barth’s Critically Realistic Dialectical Theology: Its Genesis and Development, 1909–1936. Oxford: OUP Premium.Google Scholar
  29. Moses, John A. 1999. Bonhoeffer’s Germany: The Political Context. In The Cambridge Companion to Dietrich Bonhoeffer, ed. John de Gruchy, 3–21. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Moses, John A. 2009. The Reluctant Revolutionary. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  31. Müller, Jan Werner. 1991. Carl Schmitt, Hans Freyer and the Radical Conservative Critique of Liberal Democracy in the Weimar Republic. History of Political Thought 12 (4): 695–715.Google Scholar
  32. Oakes, Kenneth. 2012. Karl Barth on Theology and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Paulson, Stanley L. 1992. The Neo-Kantian Dimension of Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 12 (3): 311–332.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/12.3.311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Preuß, Ulrich K. 2014. Carl Schmitt and the Weimar Constitution. In The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt, ed. Jens Meierhenrich, Oliver Simons, and Ulrich K. Preuß. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  35. Ringer, Fritz. 1969. The Decline of the German Mandarins: The German Academic Community, 1890–1933. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  36. Ringer, Fritz. 1989. Bildung: The Social and Ideological Context of the German Historical Tradition. History of European Ideas 10 (2): 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rumscheidt, Martin. 1972. Revelation and Theology: An Analysis of the Barth-Harnack Correspondence of 1923. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rumscheidt, Martin. 1999. The Formation of Bonhoeffer’s Theology. In The Cambridge Companion to Dietrich Bonhoeffer, ed. John W. De Gruchy, 50–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schlingensiepen, Ferdinand. 2010. Dietrich Bonhoeffer 1906–1945: Martyr, Thinker, Man of Resistance, trans. Isabel Best. London and New York: T & T Clark International.Google Scholar
  40. Schmitt, Carl. 2005. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, trans. George Schwab. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Schulz, Heiko. 2009. Germany and Austria: A Modest Head Start: The German Reception of Kierkegaard. In Kierkegaard’s International Reception: Northern and Western Europe, ed. Jon Stewart, 307–419. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  42. Schwab, George. 2005. Introduction. In Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, xxxvii–lii. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Tödt, Heinz Eduard. 2007. Authentic Faith: Bonhoeffer’s Theological Ethics in Context, trans. David Stassen and Ilse Tödt. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  44. Zimmermann, Jens. 2009. Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Martin Heidegger: Two Different Visions of Humanity. In Bonhoeffer and Continental Thought—Cruciform Philosophy, ed. Brian Gregor and Jens Zimmermann, 102–155. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petra Brown
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Arts-EducationDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia

Personalised recommendations