Advertisement

Bonhoeffer pp 145-166 | Cite as

The Limits of the Extraordinary Situation?

  • Petra Brown
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter begins to consider possible limitations to action in an ‘extraordinary situation’, each of which can be found in Bonhoeffer’s writing. The first is the place of the church as the locus of discipleship, which puts a limit to the isolated, existential disciple. The second is Bonhoeffer’s ultimate/penultimate distinction, which is considered an important part of Bonhoeffer’s political theology and locates existential action in a broader context. Finally, the role of guilt is considered as a limit and is of particular interest and relevance to contemporary political philosophy through the work of Michael Walzer.

References

  1. Bonhoeffer. 2003. Discipleship, trans. Barbara Green and Reinhard Krauss. Dietrich Bonhoeffer Works English. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bonhoeffer, Dietrich. 2004. Creation and Fall. Dietrich Bonhoeffer Works English. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bonhoeffer, Dietrich. 2009a. Ethics, trans. Reinhard Krauss, Charles C. West, and Douglass W. Stott. Dietrich Bonhoeffer Works English. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bonhoeffer, Dietrich. 2009b. Sanctorum Communio, trans. Reinhard Krauss and Nancy Lukens. Dietrich Bonhoeffer Works English. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  5. Charles, J.D. 2008. Retrieving the Natural Law: A Return to Moral First Things. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans. Google Scholar
  6. Coady, C.A.J. 2014. The Problem of Dirty Hands. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=dirty-hands. Accessed 14 August 2017.
  7. DeJonge, Michael. 2016. Martin Luther, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, and Political Theologies. In Oxford Research Encyclopedias. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  8. Grabill, Stephen J. 2006. Rediscovering the Natural Law in Reformed Theological Ethics. Grandrapids, MI: Eerdsmans.Google Scholar
  9. Green, Clifford J. 1999. Bonhoeffer: A Theology of Sociality. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  10. Green, Clifford J. 2012. Sociality, Discipleship, and Worldly Theology in Bonhoeffer’s Christian Humanism. In Being Human, Becoming Human: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Social Thought. Cambridge, UK: James Clarke Company.Google Scholar
  11. Gustafson, James M. 1978. Protestant and Roman Catholic Ethics. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kelly, Geffrey B. 2008. Kierkegaard as ‘Antidote’ and the Impact on Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s Concept of Christian Discipleship. In Bonhoeffer’s Intellectual Formation: Theology and Philsoohpy in His Thought, ed. Peter Frick, 147–165. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  13. Kierkegaard, Søren. 1983. Fear and Trembling/Repetition. Kierkegaard’s Writings. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kirkpatrick, Matthew D. 2011. Attacks on Christendom in a World Come of Age: Kierkegaard, Bonhoeffer, and the Question of “Religionless Christianity”. Princeton Theological Monograph Series 166. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Law, David R. 2011. Redeeming the Penultimate: Discipleship and Church in the Thought of Søren Kierkegaard and Dietrich Bonhoeffer. International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church 11 (1): 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, Kevin. 2003. Goethe’s Iphigenie and Euripides’ Iphigenia in Taurus. Journal of the Australiasian Univerisities Modern Language Association, Feb. 2003: 64–74.Google Scholar
  17. Manoussakis, John Panteleimon. 2009. “At the Recurrent End of the Unending”: Bonhoeffer’s Eschatology of the Penultimate. In Bonhoeffer and Contintal Thought: Cruciform Philosophy, ed. Brian Gregor and Jens Zimmerman, 226–244. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Nagel, Thomas. 1972. War and Massacre. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1 (2): 123–144.Google Scholar
  19. Nielsen, Kirsten Busch. 2012. Community Turned Inside Out. In Being Human, Becoming Human: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Social Thought. Cambridge, UK: James Clarke Company.Google Scholar
  20. Palmisano, Trey, and Reinhard Krauss. 2016. Peace and Violence in the Ethics of Dietrich Bonhoeffer: An Analysis of Method. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock.Google Scholar
  21. Phillips, Jacob. 2018. ‘Having-to-Be-Thus’: On Bonhoeffer’s Reading of Goethe’s Iphegenia in Tauris. Literature & Theology 32 (3): 357–370.  https://doi.org/10.1093/litthe/fry020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rasmussen, Larry. 2005. Dietrich Bonhoeffer: Reality and Resistance. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
  23. Schliesser, Christine. 2006. Everyone Who Acts Responsibly Becomes Guilty: The Concept of Accepting Guilt in Dietrich Bonhoeffer: Reconstruction and Critical Assessment. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag.Google Scholar
  24. Schlingensiepen, Ferdinand. 2010. Dietrich Bonhoeffer 1906–1945: Martyr, Thinker, Man of Resistance, trans. Isabel Best. London and New York: T & T Clark International.Google Scholar
  25. Valčo, Michal. 2017. The Value of Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s Theological-Ethical Reading of Søren Kierkegaard. European Journal of Science and Theology 13 (1): 47–58.Google Scholar
  26. Walzer, Michael. 1973. Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands. Philosophy & Public Affairs 2 (2): 160–180.Google Scholar
  27. Whitford, David M. 2003. Luther’s Political Encounters. In The Cambridge Companion to Martin Luther, ed. Donald K. McKim, 179–191. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petra Brown
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Arts-EducationDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia

Personalised recommendations