Performance of a Small Engine Fueled by Methane Using a Simulation Tool

  • Shahril Nizam Mohamed Soid
  • Muhammad Najib Abdul Hamid
  • Mohd Suyerdi Omar
  • Muhammad Iqbal Ahmad
Part of the Advanced Structured Materials book series (STRUCTMAT, volume 102)


Climate change and increased demands for energy, tends the researchers to search for environmental friendly resources of alternative fuels that can be used in internal combustion engines. There are many types of existing alternative fuels that can be used in internal combustion engines, but the fundamental information about their combustion process is still limited. This study focus on the performance of methane fueled engines in a small spark ignition gasoline engine. The engine performance was measured on the brake torque, brake power, brake mean effective pressure (Bmep) and in-cylinder peak pressure. A Modenas Kriss 110cc gasoline engine was selected for experimentation and engine modelling. The 3D engine model was created using CATIA and the engine performance simulation was performed using GT-Suite v7.4.3. The engine performance results for the methane fueled engine were found to be lower at about 20.1% for engine torque, brake power and bmep and 12.0% for in-cylinder peak pressure when compared to the gasoline engine. From these results it can be concluded that the methane fuel can be used as an alternative fuel but it produces lower engine performance compared to a gasoline engine.


Methane GT-Suite Engine 



The authors would like to thank Universiti Kuala Lumpur Malaysian Spanish Institute for the financial support for this research work via UniKL STRG grant UniKL/CoRI/str15028.


  1. 1.
    Malenshek, M., Olsen, D.: Methane number testing of alternative gaseous fuels. Fuel 88, 650–656 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibrahim, A., Bari, S.: A comparison between EGR and lean-burn strategies employed in a natural gas SI engine using a two-zone combustion model. Energ. Convers. Manage. 50, 3129–3139 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rahman, M., Mohammed, K.M., Bakar, R.A.: Effects of air-fuel ratio and engine speed on performance of hydrogen fueled port injection engine. J. Appl. Sci. 9, 1128–1134 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chandra, R., Vijay, V.K.: Performance evaluation of a constant speed IC engine on CNG, methane enriched biogas and biogas. Appl. Energ. 88, 3969–3977 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ajmali, S., Mahmood, W.W., Abdullah, S., et al.: Comparison of performance and emission of a gasoline engine fueled by gasoline and CNG under various throttle positions. J. Appl. Sci. 14, 386–390 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ameri, M., Kiaahmadi, F., Khanaki, M.: Comparative analysis of the performance of a dual-fuel internal combustion engine for CNG and gasoline fuels. J. Power Technol. 92, 214–226 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bordelanne, O., Montero, M., Bravin, F., et al.: Biomethane CNG hybrid: A reduction by more than 80% of the greenhouse gases emissions compared to gasoline. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 3, 617–624 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Semin, Bakar R.A.: A technical review of compressed natural gas as an alternative fuel for internal combustion engines. Am. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 1, 302–311 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gamma Technologies.: GT-SUITE-Flow Theory Manual, in Gamma Technologies Inc. (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bos, M.: Validation GT-power model cyclops heavy duty diesel engine. M.Sc, Eindhoven University of Technology (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Said, M.F.M., Aziz, A.B.A., Latiff, Z.A., et al.: Investigation of Cylinder Deactivation (CDA) Strategies on Part Load Conditions. SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-2549 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaleemuddin, S., Amba Prasad Rao, G.: Development of dual fuel single cylinder natural gas engine an analysis and experimental investigation for performance and emission. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 6, 929–936 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shahril Nizam Mohamed Soid
    • 1
  • Muhammad Najib Abdul Hamid
    • 1
  • Mohd Suyerdi Omar
    • 1
  • Muhammad Iqbal Ahmad
    • 2
  1. 1.Malaysian Spanish Institute, Universiti Kuala LumpurKedahMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Bioengineering and TechnologyUniversiti Malaysia KelantanJeli, KelantanMalaysia

Personalised recommendations