Welfare Issues and Veterinary Treatments
The primary basis for the concept of “animal welfare” is the belief that animals are sentient being capable to experience good or bad feelings or emotional states. Stress and stress-related responses should be considered as an adaptive condition of the organism that has the fundamental function of preserving the individual’s life. However, determination of animal welfare requires the selection, collection and interpretation of different parameters and validated indicators. The aspects of the fish’s condition that are often used in this context are its health status, its physiology and its behaviour.
According to the EU organic regulation, livestock farming and aquaculture should respect high animal welfare standards and meet animals’ species-specific behavioural needs, while animal-health management should be based on disease prevention. In this respect, particular attention should be paid to housing conditions, husbandry practices and stocking densities.
Indeed, farmed fish are exposed to a range of industry practices that may act as chronic stressors which potentially compromise welfare. The effects of a wide range of aquaculture practices on the stress physiology of fish are well documented, and include frequent handling, transport, periods of food deprivation, deteriorating water quality, sub-optimal stocking densities, fin-clips and environmental enrichment.
The waste derived from fish feed and its metabolic end products, such as uneaten feed, faeces and excretions and dissolved inorganic nutrients, can seriously impair water quality and can cause stress, reduced growth and increased incidence of diseases to the point to be lethal for fish themselves. Thus, monitoring chemical and physical parameters, such as concentration of dissolved oxygen, carbon dioxide, un-ionized ammonia-nitrogen, nitrite-nitrogen, pH, nitrate concentration alkalinity and temperature, is essential to ensure optimum water quality.
It is very difficult to make generalizations about how stocking density affects welfare in all situations, because a great interspecific variability could be associated with the responses to this factor. Nevertheless, high rearing densities induce in many teleost the increase of the energetic expenditure for basal life functions, which in turn could become detrimental for growth and immune resistance, and could also affect the social interaction between fish.
The preventive practices, as well as the use of nonantibiotic and environmentally friendly agents, are one of the key factors for health management in organic aquaculture. In recent years, probiotics have taken a central role and represent an unconventional approach that has numerous beneficial effects in fish and shellfish culture, such as improved activity of gastrointestinal microbiota and enhanced immune status, disease resistance, survival, feed utilization and growth performance. The concept of biological disease control, particularly using microbiological modulators for disease prevention, has received widespread attention. Probiotics thus are opening a new era in the health management strategy from human to aquatic species including fish and shellfish.
KeywordsWelfare indicators Stocking density Veterinary treatments Slaughtering Biosecurity
- Abd El-Ghany NA, Abd Alla HML (2008) A trial for treatment of Ichthyophonosis in cultured Oreochromis niloticus using focus and neem plants. 8th international symposium on Tilapia in aquaculture. Cairo, EgyptGoogle Scholar
- Adámek Z, Helešic J, Maršálek B, Rulík M (2014) Applied hydrobiology. FROV JU Vodňany, 376 p. http://www.rybarskeknihy.cz/48-english-books
- Barnabé G (1990) Rearing bass and gilthead bream. In: Barnabé G (ed) Aquaculture. Ellis Horwood, New York, pp 647–686Google Scholar
- Barnabé G (1991) Grossissement des poissons en élevage intensif. In: Barnabé G (ed) Bases biologiques et écologiques de l’aquaculture. Lavoisier-Tec & Doc, Paris, pp 422–451Google Scholar
- Batzina A, Dalla C, Papadopoulou-Daifoti Z, Karakatsouli N (2014) Effects of environmental enrichment on growth, aggressive behaviour and brain monoamines of gilthead seabream Sparus aurata reared under different social conditions. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 169:25–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bidhan De C, Meena DK, Behera BK, Das P, Das Mohapatra PK, Sharma AP (2014) Probiotics in fish and shellfish culture: immunomodulatory and ecophysiological responses. Fish Physiol Biochem 40(3):921–971Google Scholar
- Bouhlal R, Riadi H, Martínez J, Bourgougnon N (2010) The antibacterial potential of the seaweeds (Rhodophyceae) of the Strait of Gibraltar and the Mediterranean coast of Morocco. Afr J Biotechnol 9(38):6365–6372Google Scholar
- Bulfon C, Volpatti D, Galeotti M (2013). Current research on the use of plant-derived products in farmed fish. Aquac Res 46(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12238
- Bulfon C, Volpatti D, Galeotti M (2014) In vitro antibacterial activity of plant ethanolic extracts against fish pathogens. J World Aquac Soc 45(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12151
- Carbonara P, Corsi I, Focardi S, Lembo G, Rochira S, Scolamacchia M, Spedicato MT, Mckinley RS (2010) The effects of stress induced by cortisol administration on the repeatability of swimming performance tests in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.). Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 43:283–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carbonara P, Scolamacchia M, Spedicato MT, Zupa W, Mckinley RS, Lembo G (2013) Muscle activity as a key indicator of welfare in farmed European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax, L. 1758). Aquac Res 2014:1–14Google Scholar
- Council of Europe – Standing Committee of the European Convention for The Protection Of Animals Kept For Farming Purposes (T-Ap) Recommendation concerning farmed fish adopted by the Standing Committee on 5 December 2005Google Scholar
- d’Orbcastel ER, Lemarié G, Breuil G, Petochi T, Marino G, Triplet S, Dutto G, Fivelstad S, Coeurdacier J-L, Blancheton J-P (2010) Effects of rearing density on sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) biological performance, blood parameters and disease resistance in a flow through system. Aquat Living Resour 23(1):109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Delince GA, Campbell D, Janssen JAL, Kutty MN (1987) FAO: seed production. PROJECT RAF/82/009Google Scholar
- EFSA (2008) Animal welfare aspects of husbandry systems for farmed European seabass and gilthead seabream. EFSA J 844:1–21Google Scholar
- EFSA (2009a) Food Safety considerations concerning the species specific welfare aspects of the main systems of stunning and killing of farmed fish. EFSA J 1190:1–16Google Scholar
- EFSA (2009b) Species-specific welfare aspects of the main systems of stunning and killing of farmed seabass and seabream. EFSA J 1010:1–52Google Scholar
- Ellis T, North B, Scott AP, Bromage NR, Porter M, Gadd D (2002) The relationships between stocking density and welfare in farmed rainbow trout. J Fish Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb00893.x
- FSBI (2002) Fish welfare. Briefing paper 2Google Scholar
- Harikrishnan R, Balasundaram C, Heo M-S (2011) Impact of plant products on innate and adaptive immune system of cultured finfish and shellfish. Aquaculture 317(1–4):1–15Google Scholar
- Heath AG (1995) Water pollution and fish physiology. VPI & State University, Blacksburg, 359 ppGoogle Scholar
- Houston AH (1990) Blood and circulation. In: Schreck CB, Moyle PB (eds) Methods for fish biology. American Fisheries Society, Maryland, pp 273–334Google Scholar
- Huntingford FA, Kadri S (2008) Welfare and fish. Wiley online library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470697610.ch2
- Kolkovski S, Kolkovski J (2011) Herbal medicine in aquaculture. Int Aquafeed 14(2):28–31Google Scholar
- Korte SM, Olivier B, Koolhaas JM (2007) A new animal welfare concept based on allostasis. Physiol Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.10.018
- Lembo G, Zupa W (2010) Fish welfare, a key issue for organic system standards. In the IFOAM Dossier – Organic Aquaculture. Background, Assessment, Interpretation. http://www.ifoam-eu.org/en/library/dossiers
- Losordo TM, Rakocy J, Masser M (1999) Recirculating aquaculture tank production systems: a review of component options. South Reg Aquac Cent 453:12Google Scholar
- Lucas MC (1994) Heart rate as an indicator of metabolic rate and activity in adult Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. J Fish Biol 44:889–903. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1994.tb01262.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Masser MP, Rakocy J, Losordo TM (1999) Recirculating aquaculture tank production systems: management of recirculating systems. South Reg Aquac Center 452:12Google Scholar
- Mylonas CC, Cardinaletti G, Sigelaki I, Polzonetti-Magni A (2005) Comparative efficacy of clove oil and 2-phenoxyethanol as anesthetics in the aquaculture of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) at different temperatures. Aquaculture 246:467–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pickering AD, Pottinger TG, Sumpter JP, Carragher JF, Le Bail PY (1991) Effects of acute and chronic stress on the levels of circulating growth hormone in the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Gen Comp Endocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6480(91)90108-I
- Pietrak M, Leavitt D, Walsh M (2014) Biosecurity on the farm – guidelines & resources for developing a biosecurity plan. The fish site www.thefishsite.com/articles
- Roncarati A, Melotti P, Dees A, Mordenti O, Angelotti L (2006) Welfare status of cultured seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) and seabream (Sparus aurata L.) assessed by blood parameters and tissue characteristics. J App Ichthyol 22:225–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00741.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Santos GA, Schrama JW, Mamauag REP, Rombout JHWM, Verreth JAJ (2010) Chronic stress impairs performance, energy metabolism and welfare indicators in European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax): the combined effects of fish crowding and water quality deterioration. Aquaculture 299(1–4):73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Turnbull JF, North BP, Ellis T, Adams CE, Bron J, Mac Intyre CM, Huntingford FA (2008) Stocking density and the welfare of farmed salmonids. Wiley online library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470697610.ch8
- Urbieta FJ, Ginés R (2000) Optimisation of slaughtering method in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Industrial application in fish farms. Cah Opt Méd 51:71–77Google Scholar
- Van de Vis H, Abbink W, Lambooij B, Bracke M (2014) Stunning and killing of farmed fish: how to put it into practice? In: Devine C, Dikeman M (eds) Encyclopaedia of meat sciences, vol 3, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 421–426Google Scholar
- Zbakh H, Chiheb H, Bouziane H, Sánchez VM, Riadi H (2012) Antibacterial activity of benthic marine algae extracts from the Mediterranean coast of Morocco. J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci 2(1):219–228Google Scholar