Advertisement

Sound Symbolism of Contemporary Communication: Croatian Imitative Expressions in Computer-Mediated Discourse

  • Jana JurčevićEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 943)

Abstract

Generally, sound symbolism has been regarded as a marginal linguistic ocurrence because (traditional/structuralist) linguistic theory presupposes arbitrary link between sound and meaning. Phonemes are perceived as the smallest building blocks of language structure whose value comes from (distinctive) relations with other phonemes. These abstract units do not posses nor carry their own meaning, but trough their distribution they make differences in meaning of more complex language units (e.g. morphemes, words). In contrast, sound symbolism presupposes direct, motivated link between sound (consequently grapheme) and meaning, which is the case with onomatopoeic expressions or imitatives. Led by communicative practice and observation of Croatian online vernacular, we have decided to approach this problem from pragmalinguistic perspective. Starting from everyday language-use, in the context of computer-mediated communication (chat analysis), we have noticed employment of large numbers of imitative expressions with various communicative functions (not exclusively poetic). Main objective of this paper is to point out the importance of a language process (sound symbolism) that has a potential of logically connecting two different systems of human communication and expression (language and music) and shed light on developmental, evolutionary and context-sensitive features of signing activities.

Keywords

Pragmalinguistics Sociolinguistics Computer-mediated discourse Chat analysis Sound symbolism Croatian vernacular Phonology Etymology Paralanguage Communication evolution 

References

  1. 1.
    Hinton, L., Nichols, J., Ohala, J.J.: Sound Symbolism. CUP, Cambridge (1994).  https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511751806Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Platon: Kratil. Translated by Vladimir Filipović. Zagreb: Studentski centar (1979)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nuckolls, J.B.: The case for sound symbolism. Ann. Rev. Anthropol. 28, 225–252 (1999). Birmingham, Alabama: Annual Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Friedrich, P.: The symbol and its relative nonarbitrariness. In: Friedrich, P. (ed.) Language, Context, and Imagination: Essays by Paul Friedrich. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1979)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reichard, G.A.: Prayer: The Complusive Word. Monographs of American Ethnological Society, vol. 7. University of Washington Press, Seattle (1944)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Witherspoon, G.: Language and Art in the Navajo Universe. Michigan University Press, Ann Arbor (1977).  https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feld, S.: Sound and Sentiment: Birds, Weeping, Poetics, and Song in Kaluli Expression. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadephia (1982).  https://doi.org/10.2307/40240027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feld, S.: Waterfalls of song: an acoustemology of place resounding in Bosavi, Papua New Guinea. In: Basso, K.H., Feld, S. (eds.) Senses of Place. School of American Research advanced seminar series, Santa Fe (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hermann, E.: Probleme der Frage. Nachrichten von der Academie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen. Philologische-Historische Klasse, nr. ¾ (1942)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bolinger, D.: Intonation across languages. In: Greeberg, J.H., Ferguson, Ch.A., Moravcsik, E.A. (eds.) Universals of Human Language, Phonology. vol. 2. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1978)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ching, M.K.L.: The question intonation in assertions. Am. Speech 57, 95–107 (1982).  https://doi.org/10.2307/454443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ohala, J.J.: An ethological perspective on common cross – language utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica 41, 1–16 (1984).  https://doi.org/10.1159/000261706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ohala, J.J.: The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In: Hinton, L., Nichols, J., Ohala, J.J. (eds.), Sound Symbolism. CUP, Cambridge (1994).  https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511751806.022
  14. 14.
    Brown, R.W., Black, A.H., Horowitz, A.E.: Phonetic symbolism in natural languages. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 50, 388–393 (1955).  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gebels, G.: An investigation of phonetic symbolism in different cultures. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 8(2), 310–312 (1969).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80083-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miron, M.S.: A cross-linguistic investigation of phonetic symbolism. J. Abrnomal Soc. Psychol. 62, 623–630 (1961).  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Taylor, I.K.: Phonetic symbolism reexamined. Psychol. Bull. 60(2), 200–209 (1963).  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Taylor, I.K., Taylor, M.M.: Another look at phonetic symbolism. Psychol. Bull. 64(6), 413–427 (1965).  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baron-Cohen, S., Burt, L., Smith-Laittan, F., Harrison, J., Bolton, P.: Synaesthesia: prevalince and familiarity. Perception 25, 1073–1079 (1996).  https://doi.org/10.1068/p251073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cytowic, R.E.: The Man Who Tasted Shapes. Putnam, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Day, S.: Some demographic and socio-cultural aspects of synaesthesia. In: Robertson, L.C., Sagiv, N. (eds.) Synaesthesia: Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience. Oxford University Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rich, A.N., Bradshaw, J.L., Mattingley, J.B.: A systematic, large-scale study of synaesthesia: implications for the role of early experience in lexical-colour associations. Cognition 98, 53–84 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Simner, J., et al.: Synaesthesia: the prevalence of atypical cross-modal experiences. Perception 35, 1024–1033 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1068/p5469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jakobson, R., Waugh, L.: The Sound Shape of Language. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1979).  https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110889451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Doke, C.M.: Bantu Linguistic Terminology. Longmans, Green, London (1935)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Oswalt, R.L.: Inanimate imitatives in English. In: Hinton, L., Nichols, J., Ohala, J.J. (eds.) Sound Symbolism. CUP, Cambridge (1994).  https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511751806.022
  27. 27.
    Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., Turner, B.S.: Dictionary of Sociology. Penguin Books Ltd., London (2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Walther, J.B.: Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal. Commun. Res. 23, 3–43 (1996).  https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Herring, S.C.: Computer-mediated Discourse. In: Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., Hamilton, H.E. (eds.). Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Blackwell,Oxford (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753460.ch32
  30. 30.
    Kalman, Y.M., Gergle, D.: Letter repetitions in computer-mediated communication: a unique link between spoken and online language. Comput. Hum. Behav. 34, 187–193 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Carey, J.: Paralanguage of computer mediated communication. In: 80 Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting on Association for Computatonal Linguistics. ACL (1980).  https://doi.org/10.3115/981436.981458
  32. 32.
    Beißwenger, M.: Situated Chat Analysis as a Window to the User’s Perspective. Language@Internet, 5, article 6 (2008). Retrieved from urn:nbn:de:0009-7-15329Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Trubetzkoy, N.S.: Principles of Phonology. Univrsity of California Press, Berkley (1969)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Matasović, R. (ed.): Etimološki rječnik hrvatskoga jezika, sv. 1 (2016)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Simpson, J., Weiner, E. (eds.): Oxford English Dictionary (OED), vol. II (1989).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0079-1636.2004.00140.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Soanes, C., Stevenson, A. (Eds.): Oxford Dictionary of English. 2nd edn. Oxford University Press (2003)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jelaska, Z.: Fonološki opisi hrvatskoga jezika. Zagreb: Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Humanities and Social SciencesUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations