Advertisement

The Role of Truth-Values in Indirect Meanings

  • Basil LouriéEmail author
  • Olga Mitrenina
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 943)

Abstract

The problem of truth-values of indirect meanings is discussed within the semantic theory of indirect meaning proposed by the present authors in a dialogue with Hintikka’s and Sandu’s theory. The authors preserve the key notion of the latter, the meaning line, but putting it into different semantics (non-Fregean situational) and logic (paraconsistent). Like the contradictions, the indirect meanings tend to an explosion (there are always such possible worlds where they are true); to make them meaningful, there is a need of singling out the only relevant transworld connexion among the infinite number of the possible ones. The meaning line serves to this purpose. An analysis of the simplest semantic constructions with indirect meaning (tropes, humour, hints, riddles, etc.) is proposed.

Keywords

Indirect meaning Poetical tropes Metaphors Humour Riddles Nonsense Meaning lines Transworld relation Paraconsistent logic Situational semantics 

References

  1. 1.
    Abrahams, R.D., Dundes, A.: Riddles. In: Dorson, R.M. (ed.) Folklore and Folklife: An Introduction, pp. 129–143. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1982)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aronsson, K.: Language practices and the visibility of language. Reflections on the great divide in the light of ethiopian oral traditions. In: Säljö, R. (ed.) The Written World: Studies in Literate Thought and Action. Springer Series in Language and Communication, vol. 23, pp. 73–83. Springer, Berlin (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Attardo, S.: Humorous metaphors. In: Brône, G., Feyaerts, K., Veale, T. (eds.) Cognitive Linguistics and Humor Research. In: Applications of Cognitive Linguistic, 26, pp. 91–110. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baker, R.: The Delicate balance between the use and abuse of humor in the psychoanalytic setting. In: Barron, J.W. (ed.) Humor and Psyche: Psychoanalytic Perspectives, pp. 109–130. The Analytic Press Inc., Hillsdale (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barley, N.F.: Structural aspects of the anglo-saxon riddle. Semiotica 10, 143–175 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bell, N.: We are not amused: failed humor in interaction. In: Humor Research, 10. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boyarin, D.: Sparks of the logos: essays in rabbinic hermeneutics. The Brill Reference Library of Judaism, 11. Brill, Leiden (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carnap, R.: The Logical Syntax of Language, tr. A. Smeaton (Countess von Zeppelin). International Library of Psychology, pp. 245–247. Routledge, London (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carroll, L.: The Annotated Alice. The Definitive Edition. Introduction and notes by M. Gardner. W. W. Norton & Co., New York (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davidson, D.: What Metaphors Mean. In: Idem, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 245–264. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1984) [repr. 1991]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Lubac, H.: Histoire et Esprit. L’intelligence de l’Écriture d’après Origène, Théologie, 16; Paris: Aubier (1950); 2nd edn. Cerf, Paris (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deutsch, H.: Relative identity. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 Edition), forthcoming https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/identity-relative/
  13. 13.
    Elizarenkova, T.Ya., Toporov, V.N.: L’énigme védique du type brahmodya. In: Permiakov, G. (ed.) Tel grain tel pain: Poétique de la sagesse populaire, pp. 207–251. Progrès, Moscow (1988)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Elizarenkova, T.Ya., Toporov, V.N.: Zum vedischen Rätsel des Typs brahmodya. In: Eismann, W., Grzybek, P. (eds.) Semiotische Studien zum Rätzel: Simple forms reconsidered II. Bochumer Beiträge zur Semiotik, 7, pp. 39–73. Studienverlag Brockmeyer, Bochum (1987)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elizarenkova, T.Ya., Toporov, V.N.: On vedic puzzle brahmodya. In: Permyakov, G. (ed.) Paremiologicheskie issledovania. Issledovania po folklore i mifologii Vostoka. Moscow: Nauka, 14–46 (1984); reprinted in: Nikolaeva T.M. (ed.) Iz rabot Moskovskogo semioticheskogo kruga. Yazyk, semiotika, kultura, pp. 303–338. Yazyki mirovoy kultury, Moscow (1997). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Freud, S.: Humour. In: [18], vol. 21, pp. 159–166Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Freud, S.: Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. In: [18], vol. 8Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Freud, S.: The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Translated from German. Ed. by Strachey, J. Freud, A., 24 vols. The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis, London (1956–1974)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fullenwider, H.F.: Concors discordia: Sarbiewski’s De acuto et arguto (1627) and Jean de Serres’ Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus (1587). Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et de Renaissance 46, 619–624 (1984)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gärdenfors, P., Löhndorf, S.: What is a domain? Dimensional structures versus meronomic relations. Cogn. Linguist. 24, 437–456 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gärdenfors, P.: The Geometry of Meaning: Semantics Based on Conceptual Spaces. MIT, Cambridge (2014)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Girma, M.: Whose meaning? the wax and gold tradition as a philosophical foundation for an ethiopian hermeneutic. Sophia 50, 175–187 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grice, P.: Further notes on logic and conversation. In: [25], pp. 41–57Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Grice, P.: Logic and Conversation. In: [25], pp. 22–40Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grice, P.: Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1989)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gusev, V.E.: Songs and Romances by Russian Poets: Introduction. Sovetskiy pisatel’, Moscow. (in Russian) (1965)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hamnett, I.: Ambiguity, Classification and Change, vol. 2, pp. 379–392. The Function of Riddles, Man, N.S (1967)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hintikka, J., Sandu, G.: Metaphor and other kinds of nonliteral meaning. In: Hintikka, J. (ed.) Aspects of Metaphor. Synthese Library 238, pp. 151–188. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1994). Repr. in: J. Hintikka, Selected Papers, vol. 4: Paradigms for Language Theory and Other Essays, pp. 274–310. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jabbur, J.S., Jabbur, S.J.: Bedouins and the Desert, transl. L. Conrad. State University of New York Press, Albany (1995)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lachmann, R.: ‘Problematic Similarity’: Sarbiewski’s Treatise De acuto et arguto in the Context of Concettistic Theories of the 17th Century. Russ. Lit. 27, 239–252 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lakoff, G.: The contemporary theory of metaphor. In: Ortony, A. (ed.) Metaphor and Thought, 2d edn, pp. 202–251. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Levine, D.N.: The Flight from Ambiguity: Essays in Social and Cultural Theory. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Levine, D.N.: Wax and Gold: Tradition and Innovation in Ethiopian Culture. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1965)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Li Vigni, A.: Poeta quasi creator. Estetica e poesia in Mathias Casimir Sarbiewski. Aesthetica Preprint, Supplementa, 13; Palermo: Centro Internazionale Studi di Estetica (2005)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lourié, B., Mitrenina, O.: Semantics of poetical tropes: non-fregeanity and paraconsistent logic. In: Arkadiev, P., et al. (eds.) Donum semanticum: Opera liguistica et logica in honorem Barbarae Partee a discipulis amicisque Rossicis oblata, pp. 177–191. LRC Publishers, Moscow (2015)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mahmud, H.A.-S.: Classical Arab Poetic convention by the Umayyad period: a psychological study of imagination. Asian Afr. Stud. 21, 35–69 (2012)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Maranda, E.K.: Structure des énigmes. L’Homme 9(3), 5–48 (1969)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Matte, G.: A psychoanalytical perspective of humor. Humor 14, 223–241 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Menken, M.J.J.: Old Testament Quotations in the Fourth Gospel: Studies in Textual Form, Contributions to Biblical Exegesis and Christology, 15. Kok Pharos Publishing House, Kampen (1996)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Müller, R.: Metaphorical perspective on humour. In: Brône, G., Feyaerts, K., Veale, T. (eds.) Cognitive Linguistics and Humor Research. Applications of Cognitive Linguistic, 26, pp. 111–128. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2015)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Newirth, J.: Jokes and their relation to the unconscious: humor as a fundamental emotional experience. Psychoanal. Dialogues 16, 557–571 (2006)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nosnitsin, D.: Sämǝnna wärq. In: Uhlig, S. (ed.) Encyclopaedia Aethiopica, vol. 4, pp. 507–509. Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden (2010)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Otwinowska, B.: “Concors discordia” Sarbiewskiego w teorii konceptyzmu. Pamiętnik Literacki 59(3), 81–110 (1968)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Panchatantra and Hitopadesha Stories. Translation and Introduction by A. S. P. Ayyar. 2nd rev. and enlarged ed. Madras: V. Ramasvamy Sastrulu & Sons (1960)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Putnam, H.: Reason, Truth, and History. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Raskin, V.: The sense of humor and the truth. In: Ruch, W. (ed.) The Sense of Humor: Explorations of a Personality Characteristic. Humor Research, 3, pp. 95–108. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (1998)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sarbiewski, M.C.: O poezji doskonałej czyli Wergiliusz i Homer (De perfecta poesi, sive Vergilius et Homerus). Opracował S. Skimina. Biblioteka Pisarzów Polskich; Wrocław: Wyd. PAN (1954)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Schumann, A.: Logical cornerstones of judaic argumentation theory. Argumentation 27, 305–326 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Schumann, A.: Qal wa-homer and theory of massive-parallel proofs. Hist. Philos. Log. 32, 71–83 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Schumann, A.: Talmudic Logic; Studies in Talmudic Logic, 6. College Publications, London (2012)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Searl, J.R.: Metaphor, in idem, Expression and Meaning. Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge UP, Cambridge (1979). [repr. (2005)]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Senderovich, S.: The Riddle of the Riddle: A Study of the Folk Riddle’s Figurative Nature. Kegan Paul Ltd., London (2005)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Senderovich, S.: Morphology of a puzzle. Studia Philologica. Yazyki slavyansloy kultury, Moscow (2008) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Suszko, R.: The abolition of the Fregean axiom. In: Parikh, R. (ed.) Logic Colloquium: Symposium on Logic Held at Boston, 1972-73. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 453, pp. 169–239. Springer, Berlin (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Tarán, L., Gutas, D.: Aristotle, Poetics. Editio maior of the Greek Text with Historical Introductions and Philological Commentaries. Mnemosyne, Supplements, 338. Brill, Leiden (2012)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Todorov, T.: Theories of the Symbol. Tr. by C. Porter. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, (1984)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Vasjukov, V.L.: A Non-Fregean Guide to Husserl’s and Meinong’s Jungles. I-II (in Russian), Logicheskie issledovaniya No 11, 99–118 (2004); No 12, pp. 146–161 (2005)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Visotzky, B.L.: Midrash, Christian Exegesis, and Hellenistic Hermeneutic. In: Bakhos, C. (ed.) Current Trends in the Study of Midrash, Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism, 106, pp. 111–131. Brill, Leiden (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE)PermRussia
  2. 2.Department of Mathematical LinguisticsSt. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations