Advertisement

Expanding the Idea of Structural Injustice: Migrants and Global Justice

  • Francisco Blanco BrotonsEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Global Justice book series (JUST, volume 18)

Abstract

Since Rawls defined justice as a virtue of the basic structure, we have witnessed profound social and political changes as a result of an increasingly globalized world. These transformations have revealed the limits and inadequacies of the characterization of that structure in A Theory of Justice. Globalization heightens the visibility of problems for which Rawlsian theory does not offer an adequate response, such as those transcending national boundaries, as it is in the case of ever-increasing number of international migrants. This chapter analyzes proposed alternatives to four aspects of the Rawlsian basic structure alongside the normative perspectives introduced into theory along with these proposals. The idea of the basic structure of justice is thus expanded by including not only public institutions but rather the complex structural relations across the globalized world. The chapter argues that migrants should be entitled to direct claims against individuals and institutions that are responsible for those conditions that structure and drive their migration. This chapter argues not only that there is no such thing as the injustice faced by migrants but rather a complex network in which several forms of injustice intersect that can be addressed using various dimensions and frames that are only analytically severable.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the R&D grant “Human rights and global justice in the context of international migrations” (FFI2013-42521-P) funded by the Spanish Program for the Promotion of Scientific and Technical Research for Excellence.

References

  1. Arcos, Federico. 2008. Ética y pobreza mundial. Anuario de filosofía del Derecho XXV: 149–178.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, Chris. 2009. Coercion, Reciprocity, and Equality Beyond the State. Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (3): 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beitz, Charles R. 1979. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Benhabib, Seyla. 2004. The Rights of Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blake, Michael. 2001. Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy. Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 (3): 257–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. 2014. The Right to Exclude. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (5): 521–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caney, Simon. 2006. Justice Beyond Borders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Carens, Joseph. 2013. The Ethics of Migration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Castles, Stephen. 2010. Understanding Global Migration. Journal of Ethics and Migration Studies 36 (10): 1565–1586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castles, Stephen, and Mark Miller. 2003. The Age of Migration. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Choo, Hae Yeon. 2013. The Cost of Rights: Migrant Women, Feminist Advocacy, and Gendered Morality in South Korea. Gender and Society 27 (4): 445–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ———. 2016. In the Shadow of Working Men. Qualitative Sociology, 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-016-9332-9.
  13. Choo, Hae Yeon, and Myra Marx Ferree. 2010. Practicing Intersectionality in Sociological Research. Sociological Theory 28 (2): 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chung, Erin Aeran. 2006. Immigration and Citizenship in Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, Gerald A. 2001. If You’re an Egalitarian How Come You’re So Rich? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1989. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex. The University of Chicago Legal Forum 1: 139–167.Google Scholar
  17. Diène, Doudou. 2006. Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and All Form of Discrimination. United Nations. Economic and Social Council. Commission on Human Rights. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G06/103/96/PDF/G0610396.pdf?OpenElement
  18. Forst, Rainer. 2014. Justification and Critique. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  19. Fraser, Nancy. 1989. Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2003. Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, and participation. In Redistribution or recognition? ed. N. Fraser and A. Honneth, 6–109. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2010. Scales of Justice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Freeman, Samuel. 2006. The Law of Peoples, Social Cooperation, Human Rights, and Distributive Justice. Social Philosophy & Policy 23 (1): 29–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory. London: The Macmillan Press LTD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Habermas, Jürgen. 2011. “Reasonable” Versus “True”, or the Morality of Worldviews. In Habermas and Rawls, ed. J. Gordon Finlayson and F. Freyenhagen, 92–113. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2007. When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition. Perspectives on Politics 5 (1): 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harvey, David. 2004. The ‘new’ Imperialism: Accumulation by Dispossession. Socialist register 40: 63–87.Google Scholar
  27. Kersting, Wolfgang. 1994. Die politische Philosophie des Gesellschaftsvertrags. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  28. La Barbera, MariaCaterina. 2015. Identity and Migration: An Introduction. In Identity and Migration in Europe, ed. M.C. La Barbera, 1–13. Dordrecht: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10127-9_1.
  29. McCall, Leslie. 2005. The Complexity of Intersectionality. Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30 (3): 1771–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Milanovic, Branko. 2016. Global Inequality. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller, David. 1995. On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Miller, Richard W. 1998. Cosmopolitan Respect and Patriotic Concern. Philosophy & Public Affairs 27 (3): 202–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller, David. 2007. National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miller, Richard W. 2010. Globalizing Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Murphy, Liam B. 1998. Institutions and the Demands of Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (4): 251–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nagel, Thomas. 2005. The Problem of Global Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2): 113–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2007. Frontiers of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Parreñas, Rhacel Salazar. 2011. Illicit Flirtations. Labor, Migration, and Sex Trafficking in Tokyo. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Pogge, Thomas. 2002. World Poverty and Human Rights. Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
  40. Puleo García, A.H. 2005. Lo personal es político. Teoría feminista: de la ilustración a la globalización, 2, A de M Alvarez C. Amorós Puente, 35–68. Madrid: Minerva.Google Scholar
  41. Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised ed. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 2000. The Law of Peoples; with the Idea of Public Reason Revisited. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. ———. 2005. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Risse, Mathias. 2016. On the Significance of Membership in Approaches to Global Justice. Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (4): 443–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sangiovanni, Andrea. 2007. Global Justice, Reciprocity and the State. Philosophy and Public Affairs 35: 3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sassen, Saskia. 1994. Cities in a World Economy. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  47. ———. 2015. Massive Loss of Habitats Triggers New Array of Migrations. Trumanfactor. http://trumanfactor.com/2015/saskia-sassen-interview-2-15136.html. Accessed 6 Jan 2017.
  48. Sciurba, Alessandra. 2018. Vulnerability, Freedom of Choice and Structural Injustices. “Consent” to Exploitation of Migrant Women Workers. In Challenging the Borders of Justice in the Age of Migrations, ed. Juan Carlos Velasco and MariaCaterina La Barbera. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Shapiro, Ian. 1999. Democratic Justice. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Shue, Henry. 1996. Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U. S. Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Soysal, Yasemin. 1994. Limits of Citizenship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Stiglitz, Joseph. 2002. Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  53. ———. 2006. Making Globalization Work. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  54. Tan, Kok-Chor. 2011. Luck, Institutions, and Global Distributive Justice. European Journal of Political Theory 10 (3): 394–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tsuda, Takeyuki. 2008. Local Citizenship and Foreign Workers in Japan. The Asia-Pacific Journal. Japan Focus 6(5). https://apjjf.org/-Takeyuki-Tsuda/2762/article.html. Accessed 10 Dec 2018.Google Scholar
  56. Urry, John. 2005. The Complexities of the Global. Theory, Culture & Society 22 (5): 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vallespín, Fernando. 1985. Nuevas teorías del contrato social. Madrid: Alianza.Google Scholar
  58. Velasco, Juan Carlos. 2016. El azar de las fronteras. México: FCE.Google Scholar
  59. Vitale, Ermanno. 2006. Ius migrandi. Santa Cruz de Tenerife: Melusina.Google Scholar
  60. Walby, Sylvia, Jo Armstrong, and Sofia Strid. 2012. Intersectionality: Multiple Inequalities in Social Theory. Sociology 46 (2): 224–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Walzer, Michael. 1993. Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  62. Wimmer, Andreas, and Nina Glick Schiller. 2002. Methodological Nationalism and the Study of Migration. European Journal of Sociology 43 (2): 217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yamamoto, Ryoko. 2007. Migrant-Support NGOs and the Challenge to the Discourse on Foreign Criminality in Japan. The Asia-Pacific Journal Japan Focus 5 (9). https://apjjf.org/-Ryoko-YAMAMOTO/2521/article.html. Accessed 10 Dec 2018.Google Scholar
  64. Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  65. ———. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. ———. 2011. Responsibility for Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yuval-Davis, Nira. 2007. Intersectionality, Citizenship and Contemporary Politics of Belonging. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 10 (4): 561–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Philosophy, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations