Advertisement

Ethical Dimensions of Migration Policies: A Critical Cosmopolitan Perspective

  • Isabel TuréganoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Global Justice book series (JUST, volume 18)

Abstract

Migration generates complex social realities in which a variety of moral requirements come into play. Traditional moral theories, with their methodological nationalism, are insufficient to adequately attend to such complexity. A theory of global justice is required, and cosmopolitanism is proposed as an adequate basis for evaluating migration policies. Critical cosmopolitanism complements the arguments of freedom of movement and equality of opportunities based on the individualist, rationalist and universalist premises of classical cosmopolitanism, with arguments in favor of responsibility in political structures and immigrants’ recognition and participation in political communities. This revised cosmopolitanism assumes the relevance of a plurality of moral commitments and reinterprets universalism in a procedural, contextual and open sense. From this perspective, an illative logic of “both/and” allows for a reconsideration of crucial political concepts. This chapter proposes, firstly, a reframed concept of state legitimacy according to which the local, the national and the global cease to be considered mutually exclusive realms; secondly, a reformulation of the nexus between citizenship and the State and the necessity to reshape spaces for solidarity and participation; and, finally, a foundation of public culture on the recognition of others in their otherness through dialogue.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the R&D grant “Human rights and global justice in the context of international migrations” (FFI2013-42521-P) funded by the Spanish Program for the Promotion of Scientific and Technical Research for Excellence.

References

  1. Abizadeh, Arash. 2008. Democratic Theory and Border Coercion. Political Theory 36 (1): 37–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman, Bruce. 1994. Rooted Cosmopolitanism. Ethics 104: 516–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appiah, K. Anthony. 2006. Cosmopolitanism. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  4. Arcos, Federico. 2013. El cosmopolitismo con adjetivos. Anuario de Filosofía del Derecho XXIX: 255–290.Google Scholar
  5. Bader, Veit. 2005. The Ethics of Immigration. Constellations 12 (3): 331–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balibar, E. 2004. We, the People of Europe? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bauböck, Rainer. 2002. How Migration Transforms Citizenship. IWE Working Paper Series 24: 2–28.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2010. Cold Constellations and Hot Identities. In Diaspora and Transnationalism, ed. Bauböck and Faist, 295–321. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bauman, Zygmunt. 1998. Globalization. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2016. Strangers at Our Door. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. Beck, Ulrich. 2002. Macht und Gegenmacht im globalen Zeitalter. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2006. Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  13. Benhabib, Seyla. 2006. The Philosophical Foundations of Cosmopolitan Norms. In Another Cosmopolitanism, ed. R. Post, 13–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Benhabib, Seyla, and Judith Resnik. 2009. Introduction: Citizenship and Migration Theory Engendered. In Migrations and Mobilities, ed. S. Benhabib and J. Resnik, 1–44. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bhabha, Homi. 1996. Unsatisfied. In Text and Nation, ed. L. García-Morena and P.C. Pfeifer, 191–207. London: Camden House.Google Scholar
  16. Bosniak, Linda S. 1991. Human Rights, State Sovereignty and the Protection of Undocumented Migrants under the International Migrant Workers Convention. International Migration Review 25: 737–770.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2000a. Citizenship Denationalized. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 7 (2): 447–509.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2000b. Universal Citizenship and the Problem of Alienage. Northwestern University Law Review 94 (3): 963–982.Google Scholar
  19. Brock, Gillian. 2010. Immigration and Global Justice. Ethics & Politics XII (1): 362–376.Google Scholar
  20. Calhoun, Craig. 2003. Belonging in the Cosmopolitan Imaginary. Ethnicities 3 (4): 531–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carens, Joseph. 1987. Aliens and Citizens. Review of Politics 49: 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ———. 1992. Migration and Morality. In Free Movement, ed. B. Barry and R. Goodin, 25–47. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2013. The Ethics of Immigration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Castles, Stephen, Hein de Haas, and Mark J. Miller. 2014. The Age of Migration. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cohen, Mitchell. 1992. Rooted Cosmopolitanism. Dissent 39 (4): 478–487.Google Scholar
  26. Cole, Philip. 2000. Philosophies of Exclusion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Coutin, Susan B. 2000. Denationalization, Inclusion, and Exclusion. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 7 (2): 585–594.Google Scholar
  28. De Lucas, Javier. 2013. Ciudadanía. Anuario de Filosofía del Derecho XXIX: 101–124.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2015. Mediterráneo: El naufragio de Europa. Valencia: Tirant.Google Scholar
  30. Delanty, Gerard. 2008. La imaginación cosmopolita. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals 82–83: 35–49.Google Scholar
  31. Dummett, Michael. 2001. On Immigration and Refugees. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Echeverría, Gabriel. 2015. Between Territoriality, Identity and Politics. In Identity and Migration in Europe, ed. M.C. La Barbera, 175–190. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Ferrajoli, Luigi. 1999. Derechos y garantías. Madrid: Trotta.Google Scholar
  34. Fine, Robert. 2007. Cosmopolitanism. Cambridge: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fraser, Nancy. 2005. Reframing Justice in A Globalizing World. New Left Review 36: 69–88.Google Scholar
  36. Gilabert, Pablo. 2012. From Global Poverty to Global Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hampton, Jean. 1995. Immigration, Identity, and Justice. In Justice in Immigration, ed. W.F. Schwartz, 67–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harris, Nigel. 2002. Thinking the Unthinkable. London: I. B. Taurus.Google Scholar
  39. Hierro, Liborio. 2014. Justicia global y justicia legal. In Entre Estado y cosmópolis, ed. A. Ruiz Miguel, 83–120. Madrid: Trotta.Google Scholar
  40. Higgins, Peter. 2008. Open Borders and the Right to Immigration. Human Rights Review 9: 525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hollinger, David. 2002. Not Universalists, Not Pluralists. In Conceiving Cosmopolitanism, ed. S. Vertovec and R. Cohen, 227–239. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hume, David. 1987. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  43. Innerarity, Daniel. 2001. Ética de la hospitalidad. Barcelona: Península.Google Scholar
  44. Jacobson, David. 1996. Rights Across Border. Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Kukathas, Chandran. 2005. The Case for Open Immigration. In Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics, ed. A.I. Cohen and Ch.H. Wellman, 207–220. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  46. Kymlicka, Will. 1989. Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  47. ———. 2001. Territorial Boundaries. In Boundaries and Justice, ed. D. Miller and S.H. Hashmi, 249–275. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Levinas, Enmanuel. 1991. Otherwise Than Being, or Beyond Essence. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mendieta, Eduardo. 2007. Global Fragments. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  50. ———. 2009. From Imperial to Dialogical Cosmopolitanism. Ethics & Global Politics 2 (3): 241–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mignolo, Walter. 2000. The Many Faces of Cosmopolis. Public Culture 12 (3): 721–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miller, David. 2014. Immigration: The Case for Limits. In Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics, ed. A. Cohen and C. Wellman, 363–375. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  53. Nussbaum, Martha. 2013. Political Emotions. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Pécoud, Antoine, and Paul de Guchteneire. 2007. Migration Without Borders. New York: Unesco-Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  55. Peña, Javier. 2012. Migraciones y apertura cosmopolita de la ciudadanía. Arbor 188 (755): 529–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pogge, Thomas. 1997. Migration and Poverty. In Citizenship and Exclusion, ed. V. Bader, 12–27. New York: St. Martin’s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. ———. 2002. World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  58. Robbins, Bruce. 1998. Introduction Part I: Actually Existing Cosmopolitanism. In Cosmopolitics, ed. P. Cheah and B. Robbins, 1–19. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  59. Rubio-Marín, Ruth. 2000. Immigration as a Democratic Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2002. Toward a New Legal Common Sense. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
  61. Sassen, Saskia. 2002. Towards Post-National and Denationalized Citizenship. In Handbook of Citizenship Studies, ed. E.F. Isin and B.S. Turner, 277–291. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. ———. 2006. Territory, Authority. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Scheffler, Samuel. 2001. Boundaries and Allegiances. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Seglow, Jonathan. 2005. The Ethics of Immigration. Political Studies Review 3: 317–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. ———. 2009. Arguments for Naturalisation. Political Studies 57: 788–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sennett, Richard. 2003. Respect. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  67. Soysal, Yasemin N. 1994. Limits of Citizenship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  68. Tan, Kok-Chor. 2004. Justice Without Borders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thiebaut, Carlos. 2010. Tolerancia y hospitalidad. Arbor 744: 543–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Turégano, Isabel. 2010. Justicia global: los límites del constitucionalismo. Lima: Palestra.Google Scholar
  71. ———. 2013. Crisis del Estado de bienestar y pérdida de confianza política. In Derecho, confianza y democracia, ed. J. Betegón and J.R. de Páramo, 57–81. Albacete: Bomarzo.Google Scholar
  72. ———. 2016. Distinguiendo los fundamentos de las responsabilidades globales. In La justicia y los derechos en un mundo globalizado, ed. F. Arcos, 15–47. Madrid: Dykinson.Google Scholar
  73. Velasco, Juan Carlos. 2012. Fronteras abiertas, derechos humanos y justicia global. Arbor 188 (755): 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. ———. 2016. El azar de las fronteras. México: FCE.Google Scholar
  75. Vertovec, Steven. 2004. Migrant Transnationalism and Modes of Transformation. International Migration Review 38 (2): 970–1001.Google Scholar
  76. Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  77. Wellman, Christopher H. 2008. Immigration and Freedom of Association. Ethics 119: 109–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wellman, Chistopher H., and Philip Cole. 2011. Debating the Ethics of Immigration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Young, Iris Marion. 2011. Responsibility for Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ypi, Lea. 2008. Justice in Migration. The Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (4): 391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yuval-Davis, Nira. 1999. The “Multi-Layered Citizen”. International Feminist Journal of Politics 1 (1): 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Philosophy of LawUniversidad de Castilla-La ManchaCuencaSpain

Personalised recommendations