Advertisement

Healing the Scars of History: Borders, Migration, and the Reproduction of Structural Injustice

  • Juan Carlos VelascoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Global Justice book series (JUST, volume 18)

Abstract

The suppression of trade barriers and liberalization of financial flows inherent to the expansive dynamic of globalization have not extended to international flows of workers. To impede the free movement of workers, restrictive migratory policies have been implemented, and borders have been fortified with walls and fences. In the face of this widespread phenomenon, this chapter presents an alternative consisting of three steps. First, it is noted that in the current migratory context, borders play a key role in reproducing inequalities between countries. Next, it is argued that given the incompatibility of this function with global justice, it is necessary to seek some remedy to put an end to the suffering caused by this structural injustice, a suffering that is endured by an immense number of people unlucky enough to have been born on the wrong side of a border. After presenting a conception of borders that, unlike walls, would enable the movements of people, finally, a scenario is proposed in which the rights of political membership would be reassigned in a cosmopolitan manner and in which borders would usually remain open. Although this does not entail a radical suppression of the aforementioned injustice, its implementation would contribute to not only its reduction but also to the compensation of victims.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the R&D project Human rights and global justice in the context of international migrations (FFI2013-42521-P). I am grateful to many friends and colleagues for their careful reading and constructive suggestions, in particular to Francisco Brotons, MariaCaterina La Barbera, Isabel Turégano, Federico Arcos, Daniel Loewe and Astrid Wagner.

References

  1. Abizadeh, Arash. 2008. Democratic Theory and Border Coercion. Political Theory 61: 37–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, Benedict. 2006. Imagined Communities. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Andersson, Ruben. 2014. Illegality, Inc. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Arango, Joaquín. 2007. Las migraciones internacionales en un mundo globalizado. Vanguardia/Dossier 22: 6–17.Google Scholar
  5. Arneson, Richard. 2004. Luck Egalitarianism Interpreted and Defended. Philosophical Topics 32: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkinson, Anthony. 2015. Inequality. What Can Be Done? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balibar, Étienne. 1996. La crainte des masses. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  8. Bauböck, Rainer. 2015. Rethinking Borders as Membranes. In Rethinking Border Control for a Globalizing World, ed. L. Weber, 169–178. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Bauder, Harald. 2014. Possibilities of Open Borders and No Border. Social Justice 39 (4): 76–96.Google Scholar
  10. Bauman, Zygmunt. 2016. Strangers at Our Door. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. Beck, Ulrich. 2006. Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  12. Beck, Valentin. 2016. Eine Theorie der globalen Verantwortung. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  13. Beitz, Charles. 1999. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, Wendy. 2010. Walled States, Waning Sovereignty. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  15. Calhoun, Craig. 2002. The Class Consciousness of Frequent Travelers. South Atlantic Quarterly 101 (4): 869–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carens, Joseph. 2013. The Ethics of Immigration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cassee, Andreas. 2016. Globale Bewegungsfreiheit. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  18. Cavallero, Eric. 2006. An Immigration-Pressure Model of Global Distributive Justice. Politics. Philosophy & Economics 5 (1): 97–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chaichian, Mohammad. 2014. Walls and Empires. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  20. Cheneval, Francis. 2013. Migration and global inequalities. In Spheres of Global Justice, ed. J.-Ch. Merle, L. Foisneau, Ch. Hiebaum, and J.C. Velasco, vol. 1, 307–316. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Genova, Nicholas P. 2002. Migrant «illegality» and Deportability in Everyday Life. Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 419–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De la Dehesa, Guillermo. 2003. Globalización, desigualdad y pobreza. Madrid: Alianza.Google Scholar
  23. Debray, Régis. 2010. Éloge des frontières. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  24. Dworkin, Ronald. 2003. Equality, Luck and Hierarchy. Philosophy & Public Affairs 31 (2): 190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Estévez, Ariadna. 2012. Human Rights, Migration, and Social Conflict. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Forst, Rainer. 2007. Das Recht auf Rechtfertigung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  27. Foucher, Michel. 2012. L'obsession des frontières. Paris. Perrin.Google Scholar
  28. Goodin, Robert. 1992. If people were money. In Free Movement, ed. B. Barry and R. Goodin, 6–22. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Boston: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Habermas, Jürgen et al. 2005. Granada declaration on globalization. http://habermasians.blogspot.de/2003/06/declaration-on-globalization.html
  31. Henley&Partners. 2017. Henley & Partners visa restrictions index 2017 . In: https://henleyglobal.com/files/download/hvri/HP_Visa_Restrictions_Index_170301.pdf(26.12.2018).
  32. Heyman, Josiah. 2012. Capitalism and US Policy at the Mexican Border. Dialectical Anthropology 36 (3–4): 263–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hobsbawn, Eric. 2002. Interesting Times: A Twentieth-Century life. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  34. Holtug, Nils. 2017. Luck Egalitarianism and the Rights of Immigrants. Ratio Juris 30 (2): 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. IOM (International Organization for Migration). 2013. World Migration Report 2013. Geneva: IOM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kymlicka, Will. 2001. Territorial boundaries. In Boundaries and Justice, ed. D. Miller and S.H. Hashmi, 249–272. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Milanovic, Branko. 2010. The Haves and the Have-Nots. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  38. Miller, David. 2013. Justice for Earthlings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2016. Strangers in Our Midst. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nagel, Thomas. 1991. Equality and Partiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. ———. 2005. The Problem of Global Justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs 33 (2): 113–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nussbaum, Martha. 2006. Frontiers of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Oberman, Kieran. 2011. Immigration, Global Poverty and the Right to Stay. Political Studies 59 (2): 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. ———. 2015. Poverty and Immigration Policy. American Political Science Review 109 (2): 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Piketty, Thomas. 2013. Le Capital au xxi e siècle. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
  46. Pogge, Thomas. 1997. Migration and Poverty. In Citizenship and Exclusion, ed. Veit Bader, 12–27. Houndmills: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. ———. 2002. World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  48. Rawls, John. 2001. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Risse, Mathias. 2012. On Global Justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rodrik, Dani. 2011. The Globalization Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Sassen, Saskia. 1996. Losing Control? New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Sen, Amartya. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Allen Lane/Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Shachar, Ayalet. 2009. The Birthright Lottery. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Tan, Kok-Chor. 2005. Cosmopolitan Impartiality and Patriotic Partiality. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (sup1): 165–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. ———. 2012. Justice, Institutions, and Luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Therborn, Göran. 2013. The Killing Fields of Inequality. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  57. Ticktin, Miriam. 2016. Thinking Beyond Humanitarian Borders. Social Research 83 (2): 255–271.Google Scholar
  58. Tilly, Charles. 1998. Durable Inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  59. Velasco, Juan Carlos. 2016. El azar de las fronteras. México: FCE.Google Scholar
  60. Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  61. Welzer, Harald. 2012. Climate Wars. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  62. Wellman, Christopher H. 2015. Immigration. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2015 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/immigration/
  63. Wimmer, Andreas, and Nina Glick Schiller. 2002. Methodological Nationalism and the Study of Migration. European Journal of Sociology 43: 217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Young, Iris Marion. 2011. Responsibility for Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Philosophy, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations