Advertisement

Claims for Global Justice: Migration as Lived Critique of Injustice

  • Zuzana UhdeEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Global Justice book series (JUST, volume 18)

Abstract

The chapter develops an approach to the articulation of migrants’ claims and, in particular, gendered claims for global justice. This approach embeds the cosmopolitan critical theory of global justice in people’s everyday critique of structural injustice. The author builds on critical theory, especially that advanced by Axel Honneth, Marek Hrubec, Iris M. Young and Ulrich Beck, and on the critical analysis of global capitalism presented by William Robinson and Leslie Sklair to articulate migrants’ struggles for recognition and to situate transnational migration practices in the context of global interactions from which these practices arise. The author argues that by limiting our understanding of the transnational subject of justice claims to only organized political collectivities, one overlooks a significant component of social protest. She elaborates a concept of lived critique and challenges the understanding of the agents of global justice claims as individuals or transnational organized collectivities. She argues that although migrants’ lived critique does not take the form of traditional political protest, understanding marginalized migrants as a structural group allows cosmopolitan critical theory to identify more seriously based and more ambitious claims for global justice. The author suggests that the migrants’ lived critique contests the legitimacy of global capitalism and of the nation-state-defined institutional and legal framework. Finally, she highlights the lived critique of marginalized groups of migrant women and articulates gendered claims for the social recognition of care and transnational social reproduction as a matter of global justice.

References

  1. Ally, Shireen. 2009. From Servants to Workers. South African Domestic Workers and the Democratic State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anand, Sudhir, and Paul Segal. 2015. The Global Distribution of Income. In Handbook of Income Distribution, ed. Anthony B. Atkinson and François Bourguignon, vol. 2, 937–979. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, Bridget. 2000. Doing the Dirty Work. The Global Politics of Domestic Labor. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  4. Andersson, Ruben. 2014. Illegality, Inc. Clandestine Migration and the Business of Bordering Europe. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, Ulrich. 2006. Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2009. World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, Ulrich, and Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim. 2013. Distant Love. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, Ulrich, and Natan Sznaider. 2006. Unpacking Cosmopolitanism for the Social Sciences: A Research Agenda. The British Journal of Sociology 57 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benhabib, Seyla. 2006. Another Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boccagni, Paolo. 2012. Rethinking Transnational Studies: Transnational ties and the Transnationalism of Everyday Life. European Journal of Social Theory 15 (1): 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boltanski, Luc, and Eve Chiapello. 2007. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Brettell, Caroline B., and James F. Hollifield. 2000. Migration Theory. Talking Across Disciplines. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Castles, Stephen. 2010. Understanding Global Migration: A Social Transformation Perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36 (10): 1565–1586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Choudry, Aziz, and Mondli Hlatshwayo, eds. 2015. Just Work? Migrant Workers’ Struggles Today. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  15. De Genova, Nicholas P. 2002. Migrant “illegality” and Deportability in Everyday Life. Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 419–447.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 2013. ‘We are of the connections’: Migration, Methodological Nationalism, and ‘militant research’. Postcolonial Studies 16 (3): 250–258.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2013.850043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Delanty, Gerard. 2009. The Cosmopolitan Imagination. The Renewal of Critical Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ehrenreich, Barbara, and Arlie R. Hochschild, eds. 2002. Global Woman. Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy. New York: A Metropolitan/OWL Book.Google Scholar
  19. Estévez, Ariadna. 2012. Human Rights, Migration, and Social Conflict. Toward a Decolonized Global Justice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fine, Robert. 2007. Cosmopolitanism. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fraser, Nancy, and Axel Honneth. 2003. Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  22. Glick Schiller, Nina. 2009. A Global Perspective on Transnational Migration: Theorizing Migration Without Methodological Nationalism, Centre on Migration, Policy and Society, Working Paper No. 67. Oxford: University of Oxford, COMPAS.Google Scholar
  23. Harris, Jerry. 2016. Global Capitalism and the Crisis of Democracy. Atlanta: Clarity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hochschild, Arlie R. 2012. The Outsourced Self. Intimate Life in Market Time. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  25. Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette. 2001. Doméstica. Immigrant Workers Cleaning and Caring in the Shadows of Affluence. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Honneth, Axel, ed. 2002. Befreiung aus der Mündigkeit: Paradoxien des gegenwärtigen Kapitalismus. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 2003. Redistribution as Recognition: A Response to Nancy Fraser. In Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, ed. Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth, 110–197. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  28. Hrubec, Marek. 2012. Authoritarian Versus Critical Theory. International Critical Thought 2 (4): 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ———. 2013. An Articulation of Extra-Territorial Recognition. In Global Justice and the Politics of Recognition, ed. Tony Burns, 271–295. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  30. ILO. 2011. Convention Concerning Decent Work for Domestic Workers. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_norm/@relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_157836.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2016.
  31. Ingram, James D. 2013. Radical Cosmopolitics. The Ethics and Politics of Democratic Universalism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jaggar, Alison M., ed. 2014. Gender and Global Justice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kang, Hye-Ryoung. 2014. Transnational Women’s Collectivities and Global Justice. In Gender and Global Justice, ed. Alison M. Jaggar, 40–61. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  34. King, Russell. 2012. Theories and Typologies of Migration? An Overview and a Primer. Willy Brandt Series of Working Papers in International Migration and Ethnic Relations 3/12. Malmö University.Google Scholar
  35. Kofman, Eleonore, and Parvati Raghuram. 2015. Gendered Migrations and Global Social Reproduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mahon, Rianne, and Fiona Robinson, eds. 2011. Feminist Ethics and Social Policy: Towards a New Global Political Economy of Care. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  37. Massey, Douglas S., Joaquin Arango, Graeme Hugo, Ali Kouaouci, Adela Pellegrino, and J. Edward Taylor. 1993. Theories of International Migration: A Review and Appraisal. Population and Development Review 19 (3): 431–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mezzadra, Sandro, and Brett Neilson. 2013. Border as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labor. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parreñas, Rhacel S. 2001. Servants of Globalization. Women, Migration, and Domestic Work. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Pérez, Inés, and Christiane Stallaert. 2016. The Professionalization of Paid Domestic Work and Its Limits: Experiences of Latin American Migrants in Brussels. European Journal of Women’s Studies 23 (2): 155–168.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506815586469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pinzani, Alessando. 2015. Základní potřeby jako důvody vedoucí k jednání [Basic Needs as Reasons for Conduct]. Filosofický Časopis 63 (1): 57–76.Google Scholar
  42. Ray, Raka, and Seemin Qayum. 2009. Cultures of Servitude. Modernity, Domesticity, and Class in India. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Robinson, William. 2004. A Theory of Global Capitalism. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  44. ———. 2014. Global Capitalism and the Crisis of Humanity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ruggiu, Daniele. 2015. The Self and the Other in Post-modern European Societies. In Identity and Migration in Europe: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, ed. MariaCaterina La Barbera, 77–94. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  46. Sager, Alexander. 2014. Methodological Nationalism, Migration and Political Theory. Political Studies 64 (1): 42–59.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12167. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sklair, Leslie. 2002. Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. ———. 2003. The Transnational Capitalist Class. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 2016. The Transnational Capitalist Class, Social Movements, and Alternatives to Capitalist Globalization. International Critical Thought 6 (3): 329–341.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2016.1197997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Uhde, Zuzana. 2014. Zneuznání v příbězích migrace [Misrecognition in Migration Life Stories]. In Vlastní cestou? Životní dráhy v pozdně moderní společnosti, ed. Hana Hašková, 285–308. Praha: SLON.Google Scholar
  51. ———. 2016a. From Women’s Struggles to Distorted Emancipation: The Interplay of Care Practices and Global Capitalism. International Feminist Journal of Politics 18 (3): 390–408.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2015.1121603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. ———. 2016b. Social Bias Within the Institution of Hired Domestic Care: Global Interactions and Migration. Civitas – Revista de Ciências Sociais 16 (4): 684–709.  https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2016.4.23501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. UN. 2016. UN International Migration Report 2015. New York: United Nations. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publications/migrationreport/docs/MigrationReport2015.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2017.Google Scholar
  54. Velasco, Juan Carlos. 2016. Open-Border Immigration Policy: A Step Towards Global Justice. Migraciones Internacionales 8 (4): 41–72.Google Scholar
  55. Vertovec, Steven. 2009. Transnationalism. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Waldinger, Roger D., and David Fitzgerald. 2004. Transnationalism in Question. American Journal of Sociology 109 (5): 1177–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wimmer, Andreas, and Nina Glick Schiller. 2002. Methodological Nationalism and Beyond Nation-State Building, Migration and the Social Sciences. Global Networks 2 (4): 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Young, Iris M. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  59. ———. 2001. Equality of Whom? Social Groups and Judgements of Justice. The Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar
  60. ———. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. ———. 2005. Lived Bodies vs. Gender: Reflections on Social Structure and Subjectivity. In On Female Body Experience: Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays, ed. Iris M. Young, 12–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. ———. 2006. Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model. Social Philosophy and Policy 23: 102–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. ———. 2007. Recognition of Love’s Labor: Considering Axel Honneth’s Feminism. In Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory, ed. Bert van den Brink and David Owen, 189–212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. ———. 2011. Responsibility for Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zimmerman, Mary K., Jacquelyn S. Litt, and Christine E. Bose, eds. 2006. Global Dimensions of Gender and Care. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Czech Academy of SciencesInstitute of SociologyPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations