Automatic Recognition of Resting State fMRI Networks with Dictionary Learning

  • Debadatta DashEmail author
  • Bharat Biswal
  • Anil Kumar Sao
  • Jun Wang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11309)


Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) is a functional neuroimaging technique that investigates the spatially remote yet functionally linked neuronal coactivation patterns of the brain at rest. Non-invasiveness and task-free characteristics of rs-fMRI make it particularly suitable for aging, pediatric and clinical population. Researchers typically follow a source separation strategy to efficiently reconstruct the concurrent interacting resting state networks (RSN) from a myriad of whole brain fMRI signals. RSNs are currently identified by visual inspection with prior knowledge of spatial clustering of RSNs, as the variability and spatial overlapping nature of RSNs combined with presence of various sources of noise make automatic identification of RSNs a challenging task. In this study, we have developed an automated recognition algorithm to classify all the distinct RSNs. First, in contrast to traditional single level decomposition, a multi-level deep sparse matrix factorization-based dictionary leaning strategy was used to extract hierarchical features from the data at each level. Then we used maximum likelihood estimates of these spatial features using Kullback-Leibler divergence to perform the recognition of RSNs. Experimental results confirmed the effectiveness of our proposed approach in accurately classifying all the RSNs.


Resting state networks Dictionary learning fMRI KL divergence 



This study was supported by the University of Texas System Brain Research grant and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award number R03 DC013990. We thank Kanish Goel and Beiming Cao for their valuable inputs. We also thank Dr. Bart Rypma and the volunteering participants for being of help in data collection.


  1. 1.
    Biswal, B., Yetkin, F.Z., Haughton, V.M., Hyde, J.S.: Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 34(4), 537–541 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Greicius, M.D., Supekar, K., Menon, V., Dougherty, R.F.: Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. Cereb. Cortex 19(1), 72–78 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buckner, R.L., et al.: Cortical hubs revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity: mapping, assessment of stability, and relation to Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Neurosci. 29(6), 1860–1873 (2009). The Official Journal of the Society for NeuroscienceCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biswal, B., Kylen, J.V., Hyde, J.S.: Simultaneous assessment of flow and BOLD signals in resting-state functional connectivity maps. NMR Biomed. 10, 165–170 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beckmann, C.F., DeLuca, M., Devlin, J.T., Smith, S.M.: Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 360(1457), 1001–1013 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Seeley, W.W., et al.: Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J. Neurosci. 27(9), 2349–2356 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, X., et al.: Subcortical evidence for a contribution of arousal to fMRI studies of brain activity. Nat. Commun. 9(1), 395 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Song, H., et al.: Love-related changes in the brain: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 71 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bullmore, E., Olaf, S.: Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10(3), 186–198 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Friston, K.J., Frith, C.D., Liddle, P.F., Frackowiak, R.S.J.: Functional connectivity: the principal-component analysis of large (PET) datasets. J. Cerebr. Blood F. Met. 3, 5–14 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li, H., Satterthwaite, T., Fan, Y.: Large-scale sparse functional networks from resting state fMRI. NeuroImage 156, 1–13 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eavani, H., et al.: Sparse dictionary learning of resting state fMRI networks. In: International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in NeuroImaging International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging, pp. 73–76 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dash, D., Sao, A. K., Wang, J., Biswal, B.: How many fMRI scans are necessary and sufficient for resting brain connectivity analysis? In: IEEE 6th Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP) (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, H.J., et al.: Activation of direct and indirect pathway medium spiny neurons drives distinct brain-wide responses. Neuron 9, 412–424 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mairal, J., Bach, F., Ponce, J., Sapiro, G.: Online dictionary learning for sparse coding. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML, pp. 689–696. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dash, D., Abrol, V., Sao, A.K., Biswal, B.: The model order limit: deep sparse factorization for resting brain. In: IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pp. 1244–1247 (2018)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lu, et al.: An automated method for identifying an independent component analysis-based language-related resting-state network in brain tumor subjects for surgical planning. Sci. Rep. 7, 13769 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhao, Y., et al.: Automatic recognition of fMRI-derived functional networks using 3D convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 65, 1975–1984 (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yuan, R., Di, X., Kim, E.H., Barik, S., Rypma, B., Biswal, B.: Regional homogeneity of resting state fMRI contributes to both neurovascular and task activation variations. Magn. Reson. Imaging 31(9), 1492–1500 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Biswal, et al.: Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107(10), 4734–4739 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    The ADHD-200 Consortium. The ADHD-200 consortium: a model to advance the translational potential of neuroimaging in clinical neuroscience. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 6, 62 (2018)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dash, D., Abrol, V., Sao, A. K., Biswal, B.: Spatial sparsification and low rank projection for fast analysis of multi-subject resting state fMRI data. In: IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pp. 1280–1283 (2018)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    SPM Homepage. Accessed 29 June 2018
  24. 24.
    Abrol, V., Sharma, P., Sao, A.K.: Fast exemplar selection algorithm for matrix approximation and representation: a variant oasis algorithm. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 4436–4440 (2017)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Karahanoğlu, F.I., Van De Ville, D.: Transient brain activity disentangles fMRI resting-state dynamics in terms of spatially and temporally overlapping networks. Nat. Commun. 6, 7751 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zille, P., Calhoun, V.D., Stephen, J.M., Wilson, T.W., Wang, Y.: Fused estimation of sparse connectivity patterns from rest fMRI—application to comparison of children and adult brains. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37(10), 2165–2175 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Texas at DallasRichardsonUSA
  2. 2.New Jersey Institute of TechnologyNewarkUSA
  3. 3.Indian Institute of TechnologyMandiIndia
  4. 4.Callier Center for Communication Disorders, UT DallasRichardsonUSA

Personalised recommendations