Advertisement

Errors in Emergency and Trauma Radiology: General Principles

  • Kate Hames
  • Michael N. PatlasEmail author
  • Vincent M. Mellnick
  • Douglas S. Katz
Chapter

Abstract

Radiological diagnosis in general and in emergency and trauma setting demands quick decision-making under conditions of often substantial uncertainty, in which the availability of clinical information, and/or of prior imaging examinations, and/or the use of proper techniques, is often highly variable. Therefore, all such decisions have inherent error rates. While diagnostic errors are responsible for only approximately 10–15% of potentially preventable deaths in trauma center audits, as selective non-operative management has become increasingly feasible after abdominopelvic trauma, the accurate diagnosis of injuries requiring surgical or interventional management has become more imperative. As such, injuries missed on multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) have the potential to result in more dire consequences. Radiologists are key members of the multidisciplinary trauma team, and play a critical role in not only diagnosing acute, potentially life-threatening injuries, but also in directing the clinical decision-making process toward appropriate surgical, interventional, or conservative management. Radiological errors in the emergency setting follow predictable patterns, including satisfaction of search errors and cognitive biases. By analyzing these patterns, individual and system-wide measures may be enacted to help prevent similar errors from being made in the future.

Keywords

Errors MDCT Trauma Emergency radiology Pediatrics Pitfalls Emergency Errors Imaging 

References

  1. 1.
    Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error: the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ. 2016;353:2139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gruver RH, Freis ED. A study of diagnostic errors. Ann Intern Med. 1957;47:108–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson RE, Hill RB, Key CR. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnostics during five decades: toward an understanding of necessary fallibility. JAMA. 1989;261:1610–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roosen J, Frans E, Wilmer A, Knockaert DC, Bobbaers H. Comparison of premortem clinical diagnoses in critically ill patients and subsequent autopsy findings. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75:562–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berlin L. Radiologic errors, past, present and future. Diagnosis. 2014;1(1):79–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, Lawthers AG, Localio AR, Barnes BA, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard medical practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(6):377–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berner ES, Graber ML. Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. Am J Med. 2008;121(5 suppl):S2–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saber Tehrani AS, Lee H, Mathews SC, Shore A, Makary MA, Pronovost PJ, et al. 25-year summary of US malpractice claims for diagnostic errors 1986-2010: an analysis from the National Practitioner Data Bank. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(8):672–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. Executive summary. In: To err is human: building a safer heath system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000. p. 1–16.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Graber ML, Franklin N, Gordon R. Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(13):1493–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bruno MA, Walker EA, Abujudeh HH. Understanding and confronting our mistakes: the epidemiology of error in radiology and strategies for error reduction. Radiographics. 2015;35:1668–76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Whang JS, Baker SR, Patel R, Luk L, Castro A. The causes of medical malpractice suits against radiologists in the United States. Radiology. 2013;266(2):548–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berlin L. Radiologic errors and malpractice: a blurry distinction. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(3):517–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tuddenham WJ. Roentgen image perception – a personal survey of the problem. Radiol Clin North Am. 1969;7:499–501.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yerushalmy J. The statistical assessment of the variability in observer perception and description of roentgenographic pulmonary shadows. Radiol Clin North Am. 1969;7:381–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leape LL. Error in medicine. JAMA. 1994;272:181–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berlin L. Defending the “missed” radiographic diagnosis. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:317–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fitzgerald R. Error in radiology. Clin Radiol. 2001;56(12):938–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Potchen EJ, Cooper TG, Sierra AE. Measuring performance in chest radiography. Radiology. 2000;217:456–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Garland LH. On the scientific evaluation of diagnostic procedures. Radiology. 1949;52(3):309–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Garland LH. Studies on the accuracy of diagnostic procedures. Am J Roentgenol. 1959;82:25–38.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Smith MJ. Error and variation in diagnostic radiology. Springfield, IL: Thomas; 1967. 4, 73–74, 144–69.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stevenson CA. Accuracy of the X-ray report. JAMA. 1969;207:1140–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Berlin L. Does the “missed” radiographic diagnosis constitute malpractice? Radiology. 1977;123:523–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Markus JB, Somers S, Franic SE, Moola C, Stevenson GW. Interobserver variation in the interpretation of abdominal radiographs. Radiology. 1989;171:69–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Siegle RL, Baram EM, Reuter SR, Clarke EA, Lancaster JL, McMahan CA. Rates of disagreement in imaging interpretation in a group of community hospitals. Acad Radiol. 1998;5:148–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Soffa DJ, Lewis RS, Sunshine JH, Bhargavan M. Disagreement in interpretation: a method for the development of benchmarks for quality assurance in imaging. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004;1:212–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Abujudeh HH, Boland GW, Kaewlai R, Rabiner P, Halpern EF, Gazelle GS, et al. Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) interpretation: discrepancy rates among experienced radiologists. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(8):1952–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Borgstede JP, Lewis RS, Bhargavan M, Sunshin JH. RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifactorial study of interpretive disagreement rates. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004;1:59–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Renfrew DL, Franken EA, Berbaum KS, Weigelt FH, Abu-Yousef MM. Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a case conference. Radiology. 1992;183:145–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    FitzGerald R. Radiological error: analysis, standard setting, targeted instruction and teamworking. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(8):1760–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brady A, Laoide RÓ, McCarthy P, McDermott R. Discrepancy and error in radiology: concepts, causes and consequences. Ulster Med J. 2012;81(1):3–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lev MH, Rhea JT, Bramson RT. Avoidance of variability and error in radiology. Lancet. 1999;354(9175):272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ashman CJ, Yu JS, Wolfman D. Satisfaction of search in osteo-radiology. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:541–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rogers LF. Keep looking: satisfaction of search. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Samei E, Krupinski E, editors. The handbook of medical image perception and techniques. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. 438 pGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Donald JJ, Barnard SA. Common patterns in 558 diagnostic radiology errors. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2012;56:173–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Carmody D. Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary nodule detection. Invest Radiol. 1978;13(3):175–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Brook OR, O’Connell AM, Thornton E, Eisenberg RL, Mendiratta-Lala M, Kruskal JB. Quality initiatives: anatomy and pathophysiology of errors occurring in clinical radiology practice. Radiographics. 2010;30(5):1401–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pinto A, Scuderi MG, Daniele S. Errors in radiology: definition and classification. In: Errors in radiology. Milano: Springer; 2012. p. 1–7. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-88-470-2339-0_1.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Provenzale JM, Kranz PG. Understanding errors in diagnostic radiology: proposal of a classification scheme and application to emergency radiology. Emerg Radiol. 2011;18(5):403–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kim YW, Mansfield LT. Fool me twice: delayed diagnoses in radiology with emphasis on perpetuated errors. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(3):465–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Revesz G, Kundel HL. Psychophysical studies of detection errors in chest radiology. Radiology. 1977;123(3):559–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Waite S, Scott J, Gale B, Fuchs T, Kolla S, Reede D. Interpretive error in radiology. Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208(4):739–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lee CS, Nagy PG, Weaver SJ, Newman-Toker DE. Cognitive and system factors contributing to diagnostic errors in radiology. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(3):611–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Berlin L, Berlin JW. Malpractice and radiologists in Cook County, IL: trends in 20 years of litigation. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165(4):781–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Pinto A, Brunese L. Spectrum of diagnostic errors in radiology. World J Radiol. 2010;2(10):377–83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Fleck MS, Samei E, Mitroff SR. Generalized “satisfaction of search”: adverse influences on dual-target search accuracy. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2010;16:60–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Berbaum KS, Franken EA, Caldwell RT. Satisfaction of search in radiographic modalities. Radiology. 2011;261:1000–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Berbaum KS, Schartz KM, Caldwell RT. Satisfaction of search from detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography of the chest. Acad Radiol. 2013;20:194–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Berbaum KS, Brandser EA, Franken EA, Dorfman DD, Caldwell RT, Krupinski EA. Gaze dwell times on acute trauma injuries missed because of satisfaction of search. Acad Radiol. 2001;8(4):304–14.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Waite S, Scott JM, Legasto A, Kolla S, Gale B, Krupinski EA. Systemic error in radiology. Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(3):629–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    McDonald RJ, Schwartz KM, Eckel LJ, Diehn FE, Hunt CH, Bartholmai BJ, et al. The effects of changes in utilization and technological advancements of cross-sectional imaging on radiologist workload. Acad Radiol. 2015;22(9):1191–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Krupinski EA, Berbaum KS, Caldwell RT, Schartz KM, Kim J. Long radiology workdays reduce detection and accommodation accuracy. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7(9):698–704.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Vertinsky T, Forster B. Prevalence of eye strain among radiologists: influence of viewing variables on symptoms. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184(2):681–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rohatgi S, Hanna TN, Sliker CW, Abbott RM, Nicola R. After-hours radiology: challenges and strategies for the radiologist. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(5):956–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hanna TN, Lamoureux C, Krupinski EA, Weber S, Johnson J-O. Effect of shift, schedule, and volume on interpretive accuracy: a retrospective analysis of 2.9 million radiologic examinations. Radiology. 2017;287(1):205–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sokolovskaya E, Shinde T, Ruchman RB, Kwak AJ, Lu S, Shariff YK, et al. The effect of faster reporting speed for imaging studies on the number of misses and interpretation errors: a pilot study. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12(7):683–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Balint BJ, Steenburg SD, Lin H, Shen C, Steele JL, Gunderman RB. Do telephone call interruptions have an impact on radiology resident diagnostic accuracy? Acad Radiol. 2014;21(12):1623–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Loy CT, Irwig L. Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review. JAMA. 2004;292(13):1602–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Berbaum KS, el-Khoury GY, Franken EA, Kathol M, Montgomery WJ, Hesson W. Impact of clinical history on fracture detection with radiography. Radiology. 1988;168(2):507–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Doubilet P, Herman PG. Interpretation of radiographs: effect of clinical history. Am J Roentgenol. 1981;137(5):1055–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Leslie A, Jones AJ, Goddard PR. The influence of clinical information on the reporting of CT by radiologists. Br J Radiol. 2000;73(874):1052–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Robinson PJA. Radiology’s Achilles’ heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the Roentgen image. Br J Radiol. 1997;70:1085–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Berlin L. Malpractice and radiologists, update 1986: an 11.5-year perspective. Am J Roentgenol. 1986;147(6):1291–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Harrigal CL, Erly WK. On-call radiology: community standards and current trends. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI. 2007;28(2):85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Gruen RL, Jurkovich GJ, McIntyre LK, Maier RV. Patterns of errors contributing to trauma mortality: lessons learned from 2594 deaths. Ann Surg. 2006;244(3):371–80.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Pinto A, Reginelli A, Pinto F, Lo Re G, Midiri F, Muzj C, et al. Errors in imaging patients in the emergency setting. Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1061):20150914.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Scaglione M, Iaselli F, Sica G, Feragalli B, Nicola R. Errors in imaging of traumatic injuries. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40(7):2091–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    West CO, Anderson J, Lee JS, Finnell CW, Raval BK. Patterns of diagnostic error in trauma abdominal CT. Emerg Radiol. 2002;9(4):195.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Janjua KJ, Sugrue M, Deane SA. Prospective evaluation of early missed injuries and the role of tertiary trauma survey. J Trauma. 1998;44(6):1000–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Teixeira PG, Inaba K, Hadjizacharia P, et al. Preventable or potentially preventable mortality at a mature trauma center. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2007;63(6):1338–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Sung CK, Kim KH. Missed injuries in abdominal trauma. J Trauma. 1996;41(2):276–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Brooks A, Holroyd B, Riley B. Missed injury in major trauma patients. Injury. 2004;35(4):407–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Houshian S, Larsen MS, Holm C. Missed injuries in a level I trauma center. J Trauma. 2002;52(4):715–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Vles WJ, Veen EJ, Roukema JA, Meeuwis JD, Leenen LPH. Consequences of delayed diagnoses in trauma patients: a prospective study. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197(4):596–602.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Pfeifer R, Pape H. Missed injuries in trauma patients: a literature review. Patient Saf Surg. 2008;2:20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Barendregt WB, de Boer HH, Kubat K. Quality control in fatally injured patients: the value of necropsy. Eur J Surg. 1993;159:9–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Catre MG. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage versus abdominal computed tomography in blunt abdominal trauma: a review of prospective studies. Can J Surg. 1995;38(2):117–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Gonzales RP, Ickler J, Gachassin P. Complementary roles of diagnostic peritoneal lavage and computed tomography in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma. J Trauma. 2001;51(6):1128–34.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Ekeh AP, Saxe J, Walusimbi M, et al. Diagnosis of blunt intestinal and mesenteric injury in the era of multidetector CT technology - are results better? J Trauma. 2008;65(2):354–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Velmahos GC, Tabbara M, Gross R, et al. Blunt pancreatoduodenal injury: a multi-center study on the Research Consortium of New England Centers for Trauma (Re-CONECT). Arch Surg. 2009;144(5):413–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Soto JA, Anderson SW. Multidetector CT of blunt abdominal trauma. Radiology. 2012;265(3):678–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Poletti P-A, Wintermark M, Schnyder P, Becker CD. Traumatic injuries: role of imaging in the management of the polytrauma victim (conservative expectation). Eur Radiol. 2002;12(5):969–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Schurink GW, Bode PJ, van Luijt PA, van Vugt AB. The value of physical examination in the diagnosis of patients with blunt abdominal trauma: a retrospective study. Injury. 1997;28(4):261–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Mutze S, Rademacher G, Matthes G. Blunt cerebrovascular injury in patients with blunt multiple trauma: diagnostic accuracy of duplex Doppler US and early CT angiography. Radiology. 2005;237:884–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Hessmann MH, Hofmann A, Kreitner KF, Lott C, Rommens PM. The benefit of multislice CT in the emergency room management of polytraumatized patients. Acta Chir Belg. 2006;106(5):500–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Hilbert P, zur Nieden K, Hofmann GO, Hoeller I, Koch R, Stuttmann R. New aspects in the emergency room management of critically injured patients: a multi-slice CT-oriented care algorithm. Injury. 2007;38(5):552–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Kanz K-G, Paul AO, Lefering R, Kay MV, Kreimeier U, Linsenmaier U, et al. Trauma management incorporating focused assessment with computed tomography in trauma (FACTT) - potential effect on survival. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2010;4:4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Huber-Wagner S, Lefering R, Qvick L-M, Körner M, Kay MV, Pfeifer K-J, et al. Effect of whole-body CT during trauma resuscitation on survival: a retrospective, multicentre study. Lancet. 2009;373(9673):1455–61.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Drost TF, Rosemurgy AS, Kearney RE, Roberts P. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage. Limited indications due to evolving concepts in trauma care. Am Surg. 1991;57(2):126–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Ivatury RR, Guilford K, Malhotra AK, Duane T, Aboutanos M, Martin N. Patient safety in trauma: maximal impact management errors at a level I trauma center. J Trauma. 2008;64(2):265–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Hirshberg A, Wall MJ, Allen MK, Mattox KL. Causes and patterns of missed injuries in trauma. Am J Surg. 1994;168(4):299–303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Nicolaou S, Eftekhari A, Sedlic T, Hou DJ, Mudri MJ, Aldrich J, et al. The utilization of dual source CT in imaging of polytrauma. Eur J Radiol. 2008;68(3):398–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Guly H. Diagnostic errors in an accident and emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2001;18(4):263–9.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Williams SM, Connelly DJ, Wadsworth S, Wilson DJ. Radiological review of accident and emergency radiographs: a 1-year audit. Clin Radiol. 2000;55(11):861–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Stanescu L, Talner LB, Mann FA. Diagnostic errors in polytrauma: a structured review of the recent literature. Emerg Radiol. 2006;12(3):199–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Krueger MA, Green DA, Hoyt D, Garfin SR. Overlooked spine injuries associated with lumbar transverse process fractures. Clin Orthop. 1996;327:191–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Patten RM, Gunberg SR, Brandenburger DK. Frequency and importance of transverse process fractures in the lumbar vertebrae at helical abdominal CT in patients with trauma. Radiology. 2000;215(3):831–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Cain G, Shepherdson J, Elliott V. Imaging suspected cervical spine injury: plain radiography or computed tomography? Systematic review. Radiography. 2010;16:68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Voeller GR, Reisser JR, Fabian TC, Kudsk K, Mangiante EC. Blunt diaphragm injuries. A five-year experience. Am Surg. 1990;56:28–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Reber PU, Schmied B, Seiler CA, Baer HU, Patel AG, Buchler MW. Missed diaphragmatic injuries and their long-term sequelae. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 1998;44(1):183–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Onuora VC, Patil MG, al-Jasser AN. Missed urological injuries in children with polytrauma. Injury. 1993;24(9):619–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Bochicchio GV, Napolitano LM, Haan J, Champion H, Scalea T. Incidental pregnancy in trauma patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192(5):566–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Lawson CM, Daley BJ, Ormsby CB, Enderson B. Missed injuries in the era of the trauma scan. J Trauma. 2011;70(2):452–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Malinoski DJ, Patel MS, Yakar DO, Green D, Qureshi F, Inaba K, et al. A diagnostic delay of 5 hours increases the risk of death after blunt hollow viscus injury. J Trauma. 2010;69(1):84–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    LeBedis CA, Anderson SW, Bates DDB, Khalil R, Matherly D, Wing H, et al. CT imaging signs of surgically proven bowel trauma. Emerg Radiol. 2016;23(3):213–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Matsushima K, Mangel PS, Schaefer EW, Frankel HL. Blunt hollow viscus and mesenteric injury: still underrecognized. World J Surg. 2013;37(4):759–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Patlas MN. Invited commentary on “MDCT imaging of surgically proven blunt bowel and mesenteric injury”. Radiographics. 2017;37:625–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Provenzale JM, Joseph GJ, Barboriak DP. Dural sinus thrombosis: findings on CT and MR imaging and diagnostic pitfalls. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170(3):777–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Raskin MM. Survival strategies for radiology: some practical tips on how to reduce the risk of being sued and losing. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006;3(9):689–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    American College of Radiology. ACR practice guideline for communication of diagnostic imaging findings. In: 2005 practice guideline and technical standards. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2005. p. 5–9.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Guida F, Bocchini G, Sica G, Frezza A, Scaglione M. Errors in polytrauma. In: Errors in radiology. Milano: Springer; 2012. p. 27–37. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-88-470-2339-0_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Weninger P, Mauritz W, Fridrich P, Spitaler R, Figl M, Kern B, et al. Emergency room management of patients with blunt major trauma: evaluation of the multislice computed tomography protocol exemplified by an urban trauma center. J Trauma. 2007;62(3):584–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Yao DC, Jeffrey RB, Mirvis SE, Weekes A, Federle MP, Kim C, et al. Using contrast-enhanced helical CT to visualize arterial extravasation after blunt abdominal trauma: incidence and organ distribution. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178(1):17–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Willmann JK, Roos JE, Platz A, Pfammatter T, Hilfiker PR, Marincek B, et al. Multidetector CT: detection of active hemorrhage in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179(2):437–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Hamilton JD, Kumaravel M, Censullo ML, Cohen AM, Kievlan DS, West OC. Multidetector CT evaluation of active extravasation in blunt abdominal and pelvic trauma patients. Radiographics. 2008;28(6):1603–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Albrecht T, Foert E, Holtkamp R, Kirchin MA, Ribbe C, Wacker FK, et al. 16-MDCT angiography of aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(3):702–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Deck AJ, Shaves S, Talner L, Porter JR. Computerized tomography cystography for the diagnosis of traumatic bladder rupture. J Urol. 2000;164(1):43–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Anderson SW, Varghese JC, Lucey BC, Burke PA, Hirsch EF, Soto JA. Blunt splenic trauma: delayed-phase CT for differentiation of active hemorrhage from contained vascular injury in patients. Radiology. 2007;243(1):88–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Mulligan JM, Cagiannos I, Collins JP, Millward SF. Ureteropelvic junction disruption secondary to blunt trauma: excretory phase imaging (delayed films) should help prevent a missed diagnosis. J Urol. 1998;159(1):67–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Ortega SJ, Netto FS, Hamilton P, Chu P, Tien HC. CT scanning for diagnostic blunt ureteral and ureteropelvic junction injuries. BMC Urol. 2008;8(3):3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Stuhlfaut JW, Lucey BC, Varghese JC, Soto JA. Blunt abdominal trauma: utility of 5-minute delayed CT with a reduced radiation dose. Radiology. 2006;238(2):473–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Pinto A, Niola R, Tortora G, et al. Role of multidetector-row CT in assessing the source of arterial haemorrhage in patients with pelvic vascular trauma. Comparison with angiography. Radiol Med. 2010;115(4):648–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Nguyen D, Platon A, Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE, Becker CD, Poletti PA. Evaluation of a single-pass continuous whole-body 16-MDCT protocol for patients with polytrauma. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(1):3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Foster BR, Anderson SW, Uyeda J, Brooks JG, Soto JA. Integration of 64-detector lower extremity CT angiography into whole-body trauma imaging: feasibility and early experience. Radiology. 2011;261(3):787–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Patlas MN, Dreizin D, Menias CO, Tirada N, Bhalla S, Nicolaou S, et al. Abdominal and pelvic trauma: misses and misinterpretations at multidetector CT: trauma/emergency radiology. Radiographics. 2017;37(2):703–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    An organisation with a memory: report of an expert group on learning from adverse events in the NHS chaired by the Chief Medical Officer. | AHRQ Patient Safety Network. Accessed 2 Apr 2018. Available from: https://psnet.ahrq.gov/resources/resource/1568/an-organisation-with-a-memory-report-of-an-expert-group-on-learning-from-adverse-events-in-the-nhs-chaired-by-the-chief-medical-officer.
  129. 129.
    Chandy J, Goodfellow T, Vohrah A. Clinical governance in action: radiology. Hosp Med. 2000;61(5):326–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Hoffmann JC, Mittal S, Hoffmann CH, Fadl A, Baadh A, Katz DS, et al. Combating the health risks of sedentary behavior in the contemporary radiology reading room. Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206(6):1135–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Rosenkrantz AB, Kang SK, Rybak L, Alexa D, Recht MP. The reading room coordinator: reducing radiologist burnout in the digital age. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(1):65–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Recht M, Bryan RN. Artificial Intelligence: threat or boon to radiologists? J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(11):1476–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Thrall JH, Li X, Li Q, Cruz C, Do S, Dreyer K, et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in radiology: opportunities, challenges, pitfalls, and criteria for success. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(3):504–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    McGinty GB, Allen B. The ACR Data Science Institute and AI Advisory Group: Harnessing the power of artificial intelligence to improve patient care. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(3):577–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Kahn CE. From images to actions: opportunities for artificial intelligence in radiology. Radiology. 2017;285(3):719–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Prevedello LM, Erdal BS, Ryu JL, Little KJ, Demirer M, Qian S, et al. Automated critical test findings identification and online notification system using artificial intelligence in imaging. Radiology. 2017;285(3):923–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Griffis JC, Allendorfer JB, Szaflarski JP. Voxel-based Gaussian naïve Bayes classification of ischemic stroke lesions in individual T1-weighted MRI scans. J Neurosci Methods. 2016;257:97–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Thornhill RE, Lum C, Jaberi A, Stefanski P, Torres CH, Momoli F, et al. Can shape analysis differentiate free-floating internal carotid artery thrombus from atherosclerotic plaque in patients evaluated with CTA for stroke or transient ischemic attack? Acad Radiol. 2014;21(3):345–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ. Predicting the future - big data, machine learning, and clinical Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(13):1216–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kate Hames
    • 1
  • Michael N. Patlas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vincent M. Mellnick
    • 2
  • Douglas S. Katz
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Radiology, Mallinckrodt Institute of RadiologyWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyNYU Winthrop HospitalMineolaUSA

Personalised recommendations