Compensation for Impact of Industrial Projects in Russia to Indigenous Peoples of the North

  • Tuyara N. Gavrilyeva
  • Natalia P. Yakovleva
  • Sardana I. Boyakova
  • Raisa I. Bochoeva
Part of the Springer Polar Sciences book series (SPPS)


This chapter that was funded by a grant from Russian Foundation for Basic Research № 17-02-00619 examines procedures for social impact assessment in industrial projects in the Russian Federation (later referred to as Russia), focusing on assessment of impact on ‘small-numbered indigenous peoples of the North’ in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) (later referred to as Yakutia), a region in the north-east of Russia. In April 2010, a regional law on Anthropological Expert Review (AER) was adopted in the region of Yakutia, which is implemented during industrial projects that are initiated on the territories of indigenous peoples of the North. This law was developed under pressure from regional non-governmental organisations, following public debates about potential impacts during the construction of Eastern Siberia Pacific Ocean oil pipeline in 2006–2008. This is the first and only regional law on social impact assessment for indigenous peoples in Russia, the potential for which had been discussed in Russia for over 20 years but has never been fully implemented. This regional law on is a triumph of the civil society in Yakutia, which in 2018 has been followed by federal government discussions for opportunities of developing a similar federal level law. The chapter evaluates the effectiveness of existing methodology for compensation to indigenous peoples of the North in Yakutia, by examining the regulation, industry reports and regional development strategies. It examines the cases of completed social impact assessments and damage compensations, conducted during major industrial projects in Yakutia. The study discusses the features and shortcomings of AER methodology and compares it with existing practices on compensations in other Russian regions. It recommends revising the use of income-based calculation of compensations which treats groups of indigenous peoples of the North that lead traditional activities of reindeer herding as commercial enterprises. The research suggests extending the existing methodology by incorporating an ecosystem services approach and taking into account long-term sustainability impacts of industrial projects on communities of indigenous peoples. Special attention is given to the assessment of effectiveness of the Anthropological Expert Review as an institution for protecting the rights of indigenous peoples in Russia.


Yakutia Indigenous rights Anthropological expert review Traditional natural resource use Corporate social responsibility 


  1. Alexandria, C., Lucaa, L., & Kevorchiana, C. (2015). Subsistence economy and food security – The case of rural households from Romania, Procedia Economics and Finance, 22, open access, 672–680.Google Scholar
  2. Ali, S. H. (2004). Mining, the environment and indigenous development conflicts. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 254 p.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, R. B., Dana, L. P., & Dana, T. E. (2006). Indigenous land rights, entrepreneurship, and economic development in Canada: “Opting-in” to the global economy. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arctic Consult. (2017). Report on protection of rights and legal interests of indigenous small-numbered people of the North and the activity of the authorized official for the rights of indigenous small-numbered peoples of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) for 2016. Data accessed 28 Oct 2017 [in Russian].
  5. Bogoyavlenskiy, D. D. (2012). Data of the All-Russian Census 2010. Official web site of the Russian Association of Indigenous Peoples of the North (RAIPON). Available from Accessed 20 Sept 2018. [in Russian].
  6. Boyakova, S. I., & Vasilyeva, N. D. (2015). The industrial factor of socio-cultural changes in the north of Yakutia in the 1960s – Early 1980s. Theory and Practice of Social Development, 24, 34–37, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  7. Burtseva, E. I., Naberezhnaya, A. T., Barashkov, N. A., Pavlova, A. N., & Nogovitsyn, P. P. (2012). New stage of industrial development of Southern Yakutia and problems of social protection of small-numbered peoples of the North. National Interests: Priorities and Safety, 20, 13–23, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  8. Degteva, J. F. (2015). The spatial organization and dynamics of the ethnic structure of Yakutia. Regional Studies, 4(50), 99–105, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  9. Filippova, V. V. (2007). Indigenous numerically small peoples of the Yakutian North in changing space of livelihoods. Nauka: Novosibirsk, 176p. [in Russian].Google Scholar
  10. Gavrilyeva, T. N., & Kolomak, E. A. (2017). Analysis of changes in the settlement system of Yakutia. Region: Economy and Sociology (Regional Research of Russia), 2(9), 174–190, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  11. Gavrilyeva, T. N., & Stepanova, N. A. (2016). Impact of mega projects Eastern Siberia – Pacific Ocean and power of Siberia on economy and natural environment in Yakutia. Region: Economy and Sociology (Regional Research of Russia), 4(92), 237–248, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  12. Gavrilyeva, T. N., Degteva, Z., Boyakova S., Mostakhova, T., & Bochkarev, N. (2018). Access to lands and natural resources of traditional communities of Yakutia. Proceedings of the 5th international multidisciplinary scientific conferences on social sciences & arts SGEM 2018, 24 August – 2 September, 2018, Albena, Bulgaria (in print).Google Scholar
  13. Hipwell, W., Mamen, K., Weitzner, V., & Whiteman, G. (2002) Aboriginal peoples and mining in Canada: Consultation, participation and prospects for change (Working Discussion Paper). The North–South Institute. Available from Accessed 10 Mar 2010.
  14. International Finance Corporation. (2012). Guidance of the international finance corporations: Standards for provision of environmental and social sustainability. Available from / Document.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2018.
  15. International Labor Organization. (1989). No. 169. Indigenous and tribal peoples convention. Available from Accessed 20 Sept 2018.
  16. Kirsch, S. (2007). Indigenous movements and the risks of counterglobalization: Tracking the campaign against Papua New Guinea’s Ok Tedi mine. American Ethnologist, 34(2), 303–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leonov, S. N., & Shevareva, Y. S. (2017). Problems and prospects of development of traditional economic activities of indigenous people of Russian Far Eastern North. Regionalistica [Regionalistics], 4(2), 26–45, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  18. Litvinenko, T. V. (2014). Local specifics and common trends in the transformation of reindeer husbandry in the eastern regions of Russia and their determining factors. Informer of North-Eastern Federal University, 11(6), 103–113, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  19. Mikhalev, O. V., Vasiliev, E. K., Fadeev, A. A., & Mikhaleva, L. V. (2007). Methodological recommendations “Defining the amount of damage to land users and other natural resources in the areas of traditional settlement and traditional economic activity of indigenous small-numbered peoples of the North, Siberia and Far East” (O. A. Murashko, Ed.). Appendix to almanac “World of Indigenous Peoples – Live Artic”, 48 p [In Russian].Google Scholar
  20. Ministry of Agriculture and Food Policy of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). (2017). Difficult wintering of livestock and horses in the northern and arctic regions. Available from Accessed 24 Sept 2018, [in Russian].
  21. Mostakhova, T. S. (2016). Social and demographic aspects of development in Artic regions: problems of population growth, industrial development and location of ethnic groups of indigenous small-numbered peoples of the North. In E. P. Bashmakova, & E. E. Toposhunina (Eds.), North and Artic in the new paradigm of world development. Luzin reading: Proceedings of the VIII international research conference, 14–16 April, Apatity, pp. 337–344, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  22. O’Faircheallaigh, C. (2008). Negotiating cultural heritage? Aboriginal–mining company agreements in Australia. Development & Change, 39(1), 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pakhomov, A. A., & Mostakhova, T. S. (2016). Ethno social problems on the territory of Yakutia in the zone of constriction of gas pipeline “Power of Siberia”. Region: Economics and Sociology (Regional Research of Russia), 3(91), 133–142, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  24. Pelyasov, A. N. (2015). Russian Arctic frontier: Paradoxes of development. Region: Economics and Sociology (Regional Research of Russia), 3(87), 3–36, [In Russian].Google Scholar
  25. Petrov, Y. D. (1998). Indigenous numerically small peoples: State policy and regional practice. Moscow: Academia, 192 p, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  26. Popkov, Y. V. (2014). Indigenous peoples of the north in the context of globalization. Age of Globalization [Vek Globalizatsii], 1(13), 111–123, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  27. Porfiryev, B., & Terentyev, N. (2016). The concept of ecosystem services for the population and economy: For implementation in the Russian Arctic in the conditions of climate change. Russian Economic Journal, (6), 18–24, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  28. Potravny, I. M., & Baglaeva, V. O. (2015). On integration of tasks of environmental audit and ethnological expert review during grounding of projects of economic development of territories. Horizons of Economy, 5(24), 44–47, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  29. Potravny, I. M., Gassiy, V. V., & Afanasyev, S. M. (2017). Territories of traditional nature use: Development constraints or factors of economic growth? Arctic: Ecology and Economics, 2(26), 4–16, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  30. Russian Federation. (1999). No 82-FZ “On guarantees of indigenous small-numbered peoples of the Russian Federation” adopted 30 April 1999 with changes of 27 June 2018 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  31. Russian Federation. (2009). Decree of the Ministry for regional development of the Russian Federation of 9 December 2009 No 565 “On approval of methodology for calculation of amount of damage caused to units of indigenous small-numbered indigenous peoples of the North, Siberia and Far East of the Russian Federation as a result of economic and other activity of organizations of different forms of property and individuals in the areas of traditional settlement and traditional economic activities of indigenous small-numbered peoples of the Russian Federation”.Google Scholar
  32. Samsonova, I. V., Neustroeva, A. B., & Pavlova, M. B. (2017). Problems of interaction of indigenous minorities of the North and mining companies in the RS (Y). Sociodinamika, 9, 21–37, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  33. Savvinova, A. N., Filippova, V. V., Gnatjuk, G. A., Svinoboeva, A. J., Fedorova, A. S., & D’Jachkovskij, G. E. (2015). Land use of Belletskij nasleg in terms of industrial development of Southern Yakutia. Arctic XXI Century. Natural Sciences, Russia, 1(2), 38–43, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  34. Sawyer, S., & Gomez, E. T. (2008). Transnational governmentality and resource extraction: Indigenous peoples, multinational corporations, multilateral institutions and the state (Identities, conflict and cohesion programme paper number 13). UN Research Institute for Social Development. Accessed 17 Oct 2012.
  35. Sleptsov, A. N. (2015). State ethnological expertise of the republic of Sakha (Yakutia) // Arctic XXI century. Humanities Studies, 1(4), 15–24, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  36. Stepanov, V. V. (Ed.). (1999). Methods of ethno-ecological expert review. Moscow: Institute of ethnology and anthropology of the Russian Academy of Science, 299 p, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  37. Trubina, A. V. (2013). The stages of migration processes in the mirror of population censuses of Yakutia in 1897–1989. Fundamental Research. Economic Sciences, 8, 429–433, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  38. United Nations. (2007). Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Available from Accessed 19 Sept 2018.
  39. Velichenko, V. V. (2016). On methodological of valuation of damage on ethnological environment of indigenous small-numbered peoples of the North. Informer of North-Eastern Federal University. Series on Economy. Sociology. Cultural Studies, 4(04), 1923, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  40. Yakovleva, N. (2011a). Oil sector developments in Russia and indigenous people. OGEL: Oil, Gas and Energy Law Intelligence, 9(4), 1–28.Google Scholar
  41. Yakovleva, N. (2011b). Oil pipeline construction in eastern Siberia: Implications for indigenous people. Geoforum, 42(6), 708–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yakovleva, N. (2014). Land, oil and indigenous people in the Russian North: A case of oil pipeline and Evenki in Aldan. In E. Gilberthorpe & G. Hilson (Eds.), Natural resources extraction and indigenous livelihoods: Development challenges in an era of globalization (pp. 147–178). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  43. Yakovleva, N., & Grover, R. (2015). Crossing the land of indigenous people in the Arctic: Comparison of Russian and North American experiences of economic growth and human rights in energy and infrastructure projects. In R. Pincus & S. H. Ali (Eds.), Diplomacy on ice: Energy and the environment in the Arctic and Antarctic (pp. 198–212). New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yakovleva, N., & Mandey, M. (2010, April). Report on the results of the scientific research “Development of pipelines and participation of local population”. Scientific project “Exploitation of resources, corporations and society”, Scientific Center on Business Relations, Sustainable Development, Responsibility and Society, University of Cardiff, United Kingdom, 42 pp.Google Scholar
  45. Yakutia. (2011). Decree of the Government of Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) No. 428 of 6 September 2011 “On order of organisation and implementation of ethnological expert review in the places of traditional settlement and traditional economic activity of indigenous small-numbered peoples”.Google Scholar
  46. Zander, E. V., Pyzheva, Y. I., & Pyzhev, A. I. (2014). Mechanisms of compensation for damage, caused by companies-resource users to indigenous small-numbered peoples. Regional Economy: Theory and Practice, 7, 28–36, [in Russian.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tuyara N. Gavrilyeva
    • 1
  • Natalia P. Yakovleva
    • 2
  • Sardana I. Boyakova
    • 3
  • Raisa I. Bochoeva
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Engineering & TechnologyNorth-Eastern Federal UniversityYakutskRussia
  2. 2.Newcastle University Business SchoolNewcastle University LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Institute of the Humanities and the Indigenous Peoples of the North, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesYakutskRussia
  4. 4.Institute of Finances and EconomicsNorth-Eastern Federal UniversityYakutskRussia

Personalised recommendations