Advertisement

How Bureaucratic Networks Make Intergovernmental Relations Work: A Mechanism Perspective

  • Nathalie BehnkeEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Comparative Territorial Politics book series (COMPTPOL)

Abstract

While intergovernmental negotiations in multilevel systems are typically fraught with conflict and potential deadlock due to conflict of interest, this chapter argues that the specific role of bureaucrats in those negotiations is a key to understanding successful decision-making in intergovernmental arenas. Public servants differ from politicians in relevant respects: being not subject to (re-)election, but appointed to office for long periods of time, they develop neutral and expert positions on issues. Also, in repeated rounds of interaction trust and reciprocity evolve, helping them to smoothen negotiations. Based on a network survey and expert interviews among German bureaucrats, this chapter shows that those mechanisms are indeed at work and can be transferred to other multilevel systems, if certain scope conditions are met.

Keywords

Bureaucrats Deadlock Intergovernmental relations Multilevel system Network 

References

  1. Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2004). Another Look at Bargaining and Negotiating in Intergovernmental Management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 14(4), 495–512.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auel, K. (2014). Intergovernmental Relations in German Federalism: Cooperative Federalism, Party Politics and Territorial Conflicts. Comparative European Politics, 12(4–5), 422–443.  https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axelrod, R. M. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bauer, M. W., Knill, C., & Eckhard, S. (2017). International Bureaucracy: Challenges and Lessons for Public Administration Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Behnke, N. (2014). Organized Consensus: How Prime Ministers’ Conferences and Bundesrat Sessions Make Multilevel Governance Work (Conference Paper). Glasgow, Scotland,Google Scholar
  6. Behnke, N., & Mueller, S. (2017). The Purpose of Intergovernmental Councils: A Framework for Analysis and Comparison. Regional & Federal Studies, 27(5), 507–527.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2017.1367668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benz, A. (2009). Politik in Mehrebenensystemen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benz, A., & Dose, N. (2010). Governance—Modebegriff oder nützliches sozialwissenschaftliches Konzept? In A. Benz & N. Dose (Eds.), Governance—Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen (2nd ed., pp. 13–36). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benz, A., Corcaci, A., & Doser, J. W. (2016). Unravelling Multilevel Administration: Patterns and Dynamics of Administrative Co-ordination in European Governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 999–1018.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1162838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benz, A., Detemple, J., & Heinz, D. (2013). Varianten und Dynamiken der Politikverflechtung. In Europäisches Zentrum für Föderalismus-Forschung Tübingen (EZFF) (Ed.), Jahrbuch des Föderalismus 2013 (Vol. 14, pp. 155–165). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  11. Benz, A., Scharpf, F. W., & Zintl, R. (1992). Horizontale Politikverflechtung: Zur Theorie von Vernhandlungssystemen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  12. Bolleyer, N. (2009). Intergovernmental Cooperation: Rational Choices in Federal Systems and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bolleyer, N., Swenden, W., & McEwen, N. (2014). A Theoretical Perspective on Multi-level Systems in Europe: Constitutional Power and Partisan Conflict. Comparative European Politics, 12(4), 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bulmer, S. J. (1996). The European Council and the Council of the European Union: Shapers of a European Confederation. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 26(4), 17–42.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a029879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burkhart, S., Manow, P., & Ziblatt, D. (2008). A More Efficient and Accountable Federalism? An Analysis of the Consequences of Germany’s 2006 Constitutional Reform. German Politics, 17(4), 522–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chattopadhyay, R., & Nerenberg, K. (Eds.). (2010). Intergovernmental Relations in Federal Systems (Vol. 8). A Global Dialogue on Federalism. Booklet Series. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Coen, D., & Thatcher, M. (2008). Network Governance and Multi-level Delegation: European Networks of Regulatory Agencies. Journal of Public Policy, 28(01), 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  19. Frederickson, H. G., Smith, K. B., Larimer, C. W., & Licari, M. J. (2016). The Public Administration Theory primer (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hegele, Y. (2017). Multidimensional Interests in Horizontal Intergovernmental Coordination: The Case of the German Bundesrat. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 48(2), 244–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hegele, Y., & Behnke, N. (2013). Die Landesministerkonferenzen und der Bund – Kooperativer Föderalismus im Schatten der Politikverflechtung. Politische Vierteljahresscharift, 54(1), 21–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hegele, Y., & Behnke, N. (2017). Horizontal Coordination in Cooperative Federalism: The Purpose of Ministerial Conferences in Germany. Regional & Federal Studies, 27(5), 529–548.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2017.1315716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Héritier, A. (2002). New Modes of Governance in Europe: Policy-Making Without Legislating? In A. Héritier (Ed.), Common Goods: Reinventing European and International Governance (pp. 185–206). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  24. Johnson, T. (2013). Institutional Design and Bureaucrats’ Impact on Political Control. The Journal of Politics, 75(1), 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knill, C., & Bauer, M. W. (2016). Policy-Making by International Public Administrations: Concepts, Causes and Consequences. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 949–959.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1168979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kropp, S. (2010). Kooperativer Föderalismus und Politikverflechtung. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kunze, R. (1968). Kooperativer Föderalismus in der Bundesrepublik: Zur Staatspraxis der Koordinierung von Bund und Ländern. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  28. Leunig, S. (2010). Der Bundesrat im politischen System der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In K. Detterbeck, W. Renzsch, & S. Schieren (Eds.), Föderalismus in Deutschland (pp. 87–117). München: Oldenbourg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lhotta, R., & Blumenthal, J. V. (2015). Intergovernmental Relations in the Federal Republic of Germany: Complex Co-operation and Party Politics. In J. Poirier, C. Saunders, & J. Kincaid (Eds.), Intergovernmental Relations in Federal Systems (pp. 206–238). Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Martens, R. (2003). Die Ministerpräsidentenkonferenzen. Würzburg: Ergon-Verlag.Google Scholar
  31. Mayntz, R. (2006). Governance Theory als fortentwickelte Steuerungstheorie? In G. F. Schuppert (Ed.), Governance-Foschung: Vergewisserung über Stand und Entwicklungslinien (pp. 11–20). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  32. Mayntz, R., & Derlien, H.-U. (1989). Party Patronage and Politicization of the West German Administrative Elite 1970–1987—Towards Hybridization? Governance, 2, 384–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It. Public Administration Review, 66, 33–43.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00664.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Metcalfe, L. (1996). The European Commission as a Network Organization. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 26(4), 43–62.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a029883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nocaj, A., Ortmann, M., & Brandes, U. (2015). Untangling the Hairballs of Multi-Centered, Small-World Online Social Media Networks. Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications: JGAA, 19(2), 595–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Overeem, P. (2012). The Politics-Administration Dichotomy: Toward a Constitutional Perspective (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC.Google Scholar
  37. Peters, B. G. (2001). Politicians and Bureaucrats in the Politics of Policy Making. In J.-E. Lane (Ed.), Bureaucracy and Public Choice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Peters, B. G. (2006). Concepts and Theories of Horizontal Policy Management. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of Public Policy (pp. 116–138). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Peters, B. G. (2015). Pursuing Horizontal Management: The Politics of Public Sector Coordination. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  40. Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (Eds.). (2004a). Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: The Quest for Control. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2004b). Politicization of the Civil Service: Concepts, Causes, Consequences. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective—The Quest for Control (pp. 1–13). London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Poirier, J., Saunders, C., & Kincaid, J. (Eds.). (2015). Intergovernmental Relations in Federal Systems: Comparative Structures and Dynamics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rhodes, R. A. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Rohlfing, I. (2012). Case Studies and Causal Inference: An Integrative Framework. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Schnabel, J. (2017). Committed to Coordination? Intergovernmental Councils as a Federal Safeguard. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(2), 191–206.  https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schneider, V. (2010). Policy Networks and the Governance of Complex Societies. In S. Kramer & P. Ludes (Eds.), Networks of Culture (pp. 27–44). Berlin: Lit-Verlag.Google Scholar
  47. Schwanke, K., & Ebinger, F. (2006). Politisierung und Rollenverständnis der deutschen administrativen Elite 1970–2005 - Wandel trotz Kontinuität. In J. Bogumil, W. Jann, & F. Nullmeier (Eds.), Politik und Verwaltung. PVS-Sonderheft 37 (pp. 228–249). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.Google Scholar
  48. Simeon, R. (1972). Federal-Provincial Diplomacy: The Making of Recent Policy in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  49. Wagener, F. (1979). Der Öffentliche Dienst im Staat der Gegenwart. Veröffentlichung der Vereinigung der deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer, 37, 215–266.Google Scholar
  50. Wright, D. S. (1978). Understanding Intergovernmental Relations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks and Cole.Google Scholar
  51. Zimmer, C. (2010). Politikkoordination im deutschen Bundesstaat: Wandel in den Arbeitsstrukturen. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 41(3), 564–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Political ScienceTechnische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations