Advertisement

Popular Federalism for a Compound Polity? The Federalism of the Antifederalists and Implications for Multilevel Governance

  • Dirk Jörke
  • Jared SonnicksenEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Comparative Territorial Politics book series (COMPTPOL)

Abstract

Debates on the nature of the Union have accompanied the European integration project from the outset and well into the present. Much research has already looked to experience and theory of US federalism for orientation and comparability, though there remains a clear bias toward the ‘Federalism of the Federalists’. In contrast, we examine the ‘Federalism of the Antifederalists’ with a two-fold analytical purpose. First, revisiting the ideational-historical transformation of federalism allows the provision of another concept of democratic federalism. Drawing on Dahl’s classic dualism between Madisonian and Populistic democracy, we conceptualize ‘Popular Federalism’ in contrast to ‘Madisonian Federalism’. Building upon that, we depict the democratic-federal and integration challenges the EU faces. Finally, we draw conclusions on how Popular Federalism provides not only a useful concept for comparative federalism, but also for ensuring balance between effective governance, integration and popular rule in a compound polity.

Keywords

Antifederalists Democracy European Union Federalism Governance 

References

  1. Ackerman, B. (2005). The Failure of the Founding Fathers: Jefferson, Marshall, and the Rise of Presidential Democracy. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, W. B., & Cloonan, K. (2000). The Federalist Papers: A Commentary. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, T. (1988). A Republic—If You Can Keep It. In T. Ball & J. G. A. Pocock (Eds.), Conceptual Change and the Constitution (pp. 137–165). Kansas: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, T., & Pocock, J. G. A. (Eds.). (1988). Conceptual Change and the Constitution. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  5. Beard, C. (1913 [2004]). An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  6. Benz, A. (2003). Compounded Representation in EU Multi-level Governance. In B. Kohler-Koch (Ed.), Linking EU and National Governance (pp. 82–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benz, A. (2011). The European Union as a Loosely Coupled Multilevel System. In H. Enderlein, S. Watts, & M. Zürn (Eds.), Handbook on Multi-level Governance (pp. 214–226). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. Benz, A. (2016). Constitutional Policy in Multilevel Government: The Art of Keeping the Balance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benz, A. (2017). Patterns of Multilevel Parliamentary Relations: Varieties and Dynamics in the EU and Other Federations. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(4), 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benz, A., & Broschek, J. (Eds.). (2013). Federal Dynamics: Continuity, Change & the Varieties of Federalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bickerton, C. (2011). Europe’s New Neo-Madisonians: Rethinking the Legitimacy of Limited Power in a Multi-level Polity. Political Studies, 59(3), 659–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cornell, S. (1999). The Other Founders. Anti-Federalism and the Dissenting Tradition in America, 1788–1828. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dahl, R. (1956). A Preface to Democratic Theory: How Does Popular Sovereignty Function in America? Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dahl, R. (2003). How Democratic is the American Constitution? (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dahl, R., & Tufte, E. (1973). Size and Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Diamond, M. (1973). The Ends of Federalism. Publius, 3(2), 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fabbrini, S. (2004). Transatlantic Constitutionalism: Comparing the United States and the European Union. European Journal of Political Research, 43(4), 547–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forsyth, M. (1981). Union of States: The Theory and Practice of Confederation. New York: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Glencross, A. (2009). What Makes the EU Viable? European Integration in the Light of Antebellum US Experience. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glencross, A. (2014). The Absence of Political Constitutionalism in the EU: Three Models for Enhancing Constitutional Agency. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(8), 1163–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greene, F. (1994). Madison’s View of Federalism in the Federalist. Publius, 24(1), 47–61.Google Scholar
  22. Hampsher-Monk, I. (2010). Democracy and Federation in the Federalist Papers. In M. Burgess, & A.-G. Gagnon (Eds.), Federal Democracies (pp. 29–45). Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Hoffert, R. (1992). A Politics of Tension: The Articles of Confederation and American Political Ideas. Niwot: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
  24. Hueglin, T. (2013). Treaty Federalism as a Model of Policy Making: Comparing Canada and the European Union. Canadian Public Administration, 56(2), 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hunt, G. (Ed.). (1900–1910). The Writings of James Madison (Vol. 2). New York: Putnam. Google Scholar
  26. Kenyon, C. (1955). Men of Little Faith: The Anti-Federalists on the Nature of Representative Government. The William and Mary Quarterly, 12(1), 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kincaid, J. (1999). Confederal Federalism and Citizen Representation in the European Union. West European Politics, 22(2), 34–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. LaCroix, A. (2010). The Ideological Origins of American Federalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Levy, J. (2006). Beyond Publius: Montesquieu, Liberal Republicanism, and the Small-Republic Thesis. History of Political Thought, 27(1), 50–90.Google Scholar
  30. Madison, J. (1821). Note to His Speech on the Right of Suffrage. In M. Farrand (Ed.) (1937), Vol. III of Revised Edition of Four Volumes, The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787 (pp. 450–455). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Main, J. T. (2004). The Antifederalists: Critics of the Constitution 1781–1788. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  32. Mann, D. J. (2012). ‘We, the People’ vs. ‘We, the Peoples’: The Debate over the Nature of the Union in the USA and Canada and Its Lessons for European Integration (dissertation). Florence, European University Institute.Google Scholar
  33. McDowell, G. (1982). Were the Anti-Federalists Right? Judicial Activism and the Problem of Consolidated Government. Publius, 12(3), 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miller, J. (1991). The Rise and Fall of Democracy in Early America, 1630–1789: The Legacy for Contemporary Politics. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Montesquieu, C. (1748). Spirit of the Laws. In A. Cohler, B. Miller, & H. Stone (Eds.), Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Pickerill, J. M., & Bowling, C. (2014). Polarized Politics, Parties and Policies: Fragemented Federalism in 2013–2014. Publius, 44(3), 369–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pocock, J. G. A. (1988). States, Republics, and Empires: The American Founding in Early Modern Perspective. In T. Ball & J. G. A. Pocock (Eds.), Conceptual Change and the Constitution (pp. 55–77). Kansas: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  38. Rossiter, C. (Ed.). (1961). The Federalist Papers: Hamilton, Madison, JAY, with New Introduction and Notes by Charles Kesler (1999). New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  39. Siemers, D. (2003). The Anti-Federalists: Men of Great Faith and Forbearance. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  40. Stepan, A. (1999). Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model. Journal of Democracy, 10(4), 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Storing, H. (1981a). The Complete Anti-Federalist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Storing, H. (1981b). What the Anti-Federalists Were For: The Political Thought of the Opponents of the Constitution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Taylor, Q. (2009). A System Without a Precedent: The Federalism of the Federalist Papers. In A. Ward & L. Ward (Eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Federalism (pp. 175–192). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  44. Wood, G. (1969). The Creation of the American Republic 1776–1787. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  45. Wood, G. (2009). Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789–1814. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Political ScienceTechnische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations