Advertisement

Introduction: The Relevance of Studying Multilevel Governance

  • Nathalie BehnkeEmail author
  • Jörg Broschek
  • Jared Sonnicksen
Chapter
Part of the Comparative Territorial Politics book series (COMPTPOL)

Abstract

This introductory chapter situates the volume in the broader context of research on multilevel politics. Approximately 20 years after the first influential works on the then new notion of multilevel governance, it aims to present an up-to-date state of the art. Multilevel governance theory has become more refined since; also, its notions are fruitfully being used by different strands of research. Mirroring Arthur Benz’s multifaceted research agenda, the volume bundles contributions in four interrelated themes: Governance within the modern state, especially in the field of public administration (1); governance among various tiers inside and outside the framework of the modern state (2); federalism, with a special focus on its relationship with democracy (3) and, finally, continuity and change of (multilevel) governance arrangements (4). We argue that this array of contributions illustrates the great potential of multilevel governance for analysing most instances of modern governing under conditions of complexity and interdependence.

Keywords

Governance Multilevel Federalism Public administration State 

References

  1. Alcantara, C., Broschek, J., & Nelles, J. (2016). Rethinking Multilevel Governance as an Instance of Multilevel Politics: A Conceptual Strategy. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(1), 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcantara, C., & Nelles, J. (2014). Indigenous Peoples and the State in Settler Societies: Toward a More Robust Definition of Multilevel Governance. Publius, 44(1), 183–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bache, I., & Flinders, M. V. (2004). Multi-level Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bache, I., & Flinders, M. V. (2015). Multi-level Governance: Essential Readings, Vol. I (Vol. Bd. 1). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  5. Bakvis, H., & Skogstad, G. (2012). Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy. In H. Bakvis & G. Skogstad (Eds.), Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy, Vol. Book, Whole, pp. 2–19. Don Mills: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Barber, B. R. (2013). If Mayors Ruled the World: Dysfunctional Nations, Rising Cities. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bartolini, S. (2005). Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building and Political Structuring Between the Nation-State and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Behnke, N., & Benz, A. (Eds.). (2009). Federalism and Constitutional Change. Special Issue of Publius, 39(2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Behnke, N., & Kropp, S. (Eds.). (2018). Ten Years of Federalism Reform in Germany: Dynamics and Effects of Institutional Development. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Behnke, N., & Mueller, S. (2017). The Purpose of Intergovernmental Councils: A Framework for Analysis and Comparison. Regional & Federal Studies, 27(5), 507–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benz, A. (1985). Föderalismus als dynamisches System. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Benz, A. (1994). Kooperative Verwaltung. Funktionen, Voraussetzungen und Folgen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  13. Benz, A. (2007). Multilevel Governance. In A. Benz, S. Lütz, U. Schimank, & G. Simonis (Eds.), Handbuch Governance (pp. 297–310). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Benz, A. (2008). Der moderne Staat (2nd ed.). Munich: Oldenbourg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Benz, A. (2012a). Yardstick Competition and Policy Learning in Multi-level Systems. Regional & Federal Studies, 22(3), 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Benz, A. (2012b). Eine Gestalt, die alt geworden ist? Thesen zum Wandel des Staates. Leviathan, 40(2), 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Benz, A., & Broschek, J. (Eds.). (2013a). Federal Dynamics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Benz, A., & Broschek, J. (2013b). Conclusion: Theorizing Federal Dynamics. In A. Benz & J. Broschek (Eds.), Federal Dynamics: Continuity, Change and the Varieties of Federalism (pp. 366–388). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Benz, A., & Broschek, J. (2013c). Federal Dynamics: Introduction. In A. Benz & J. Broschek (Eds.), Federal Dynamics: Continuity, Change and Varieties of Federalism (pp. 1–23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Benz, A., & Dose, N. (2010). Governance - Modebegriff oder nützliches sozialwissenschaftliches Konzept? In A. Benz & N. Dose (Eds.), Governance - Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen (2nd ed., pp. 13–36). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Benz, A., & Sonnicksen, J. (2017). Patterns of Federal Democracy: Tensions, Friction, or Balance Between Two Government Dimensions. European Political Science Review, 9(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Benz, A., & Sonnicksen, J. (2018). Advancing Backwards: Why Institutional Reform of German Federalism Reinforced Joint Decision-Making. Publius, 48(1), 134–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bolleyer, N., & Thorlakson, L. (2012). Beyond Decentralization—The Comparative Study of Interdependence in Federal Systems. Publius, 42(4), 566–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Braun, D. (2011). How Centralized Federations Avoid Over-centralization. Regional & Federal Studies, 21(1), 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Broschek, J. (2011). Conceptualizing and Theorizing Constitutional Change in Federal Systems: Insights from Historical Institutionalism. Regional & Federal Studies, 21(4–5), 539–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Broschek, J. (2015a). Pathways of Federal Reform: Australia, Canada, Germany, and Switzerland. Publius, 45(1), 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Broschek, J. (2015b). Exploring Authority Migration in Multilevel Architectures: A Historical-Institutionalist Framework. Comparative European Politics, 13(6), 656–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dose, N. (1997). Die verhandelnde Verwaltung. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  29. Enderlein, H., Wälti, S., & Zürn, M. (2010). Handbook on Multi-level Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fabbrini, S. (2016). The Constitutional Conundrum of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(1), 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferrera, M. (2005). The Boundaries of Welfare: European Integration and the New Spatial Politics of Social Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Genschel, P., & Jachtenfuchs, M. (2014). Beyond the Regulatory Polity? The European Integration of Core State Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Gerber, E., & Kollman, K. (2004). Introduction—Authority Migration: Defining an Emerging Research Agenda. PS: Political Science and Politics, 37(3), 397–401.Google Scholar
  34. Gibson, E. L. (2013). Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Federal Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Héritier, A. (2002). Common Goods: Reinventing European and International Governance. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  36. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Vol. 25). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hombrado, A. (2011). Learning to Catch the Wave? Regional Demands for Constitutional Change in Contexts of Asymmetrical Arrangements. Regional & Federal Studies, 21(4–5), 479–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Types of Multi-level Governance. European Integration Online Papers, 5(11).Google Scholar
  39. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2016). Community, Scale, and Regional Governance. A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance (Vol. II). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hooghe, L., Marks, G., Schakel, A. H., Osterkatz, S. C., Niedzwiecki, S., & Shair-Rosenfield, S. (2016). Measuring Regional Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance (Vol. I). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Horak, M., & Young, R. (Eds.). (2012). Sites of Governance: Multilevel Governance and Policy-Making in Canada’s Big Cities. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hueglin, T. (2000). From Constitutional to Treaty Federalism: A Comparative Perspective. Publius, 30(4), 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hueglin, T. (2013). Treaty Federalism as a Model of Policy Making: Comparing Canada and the European Union. Canadian Public Administration, 56(2), 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jordan, A. (2001). The European Union: An Evolving System of Multi-level Governance… Or Government? Policy & Politics, 29(2), 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Keating, M. (2008). Thirty Years of Territorial Politics. West European Politics, 31(1–2), 60–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kersbergen, K. v., & Waarden, F. v. (2004). ‘Governance’ as a Bridge Between Disciplines: Cross‐Disciplinary Inspiration Regarding Shifts in Governance and Problems of Governability, Accountability and Legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43(2), 143–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2008). West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lehmbruch, G. (2000). Parteienwettbewerb im Bundesstaat. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lowi, T. J. (1964). American Business and Public Policy: Case Studies and Political Theory. World Politics, 16(4), 677–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marks, G., Hooghe, L., & Schakel, A. H. (2008). Patterns of Regional Authority. Regional and Federal Studies: Special Issue: Regional Authority in 42 Countries, 18(2–3), 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mayntz, R. (2006). Governance Theory als fortentwickelte Steuerungstheorie? In G. F. Schuppert (Ed.), Governance-Foschung: Vergewisserung über Stand und Entwicklungslinien (pp. 11–20). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  52. Mueller, S. (2014). Shared Rule in Federal Political Systems: Conceptual Lessons from Subnational Switzerland. Publius, 44(1), 82–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Offe, C. (2009). Governance: An “Empty Signifier”. Constellations, 16(4), 550–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Orren, K., & Skoworonek, S. (1994). Beyond the Iconography of Order: Notes for a “New Institutionalism”. In L. C. Dodd & C. Jillson (Eds.), The Dynamics of American Politics: Approaches and Interpretations (pp. 311–330). Boulder and Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  55. Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. (2004). The Search for American Political Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Papillon, M. (2012). Canadian Federalism and the Emerging Mosaic of Aboriginal Multilevel Governance. In H. Bakvis, & G. Skogstad (Eds.), Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy (Vol. Book, Whole, pp. 284–301). Don Mills: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Papillon, M., & Juneau, A. (Eds.). (2016). Canada: The State of the Federation 2013—Aboriginal Multilevel Governance. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Peters, B. G. (2015). Pursuing Horizontal Management: The Politics of Public Sector Coordination. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  59. Petersohn, B., Behnke, N., & Rhode, E. M. (2015). Negotiating Territorial Change in Multinational States: Party Preferences, Negotiating Power and the Role of the Negotiation Mode. Publius, 45(4), 626–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Piattoni, S. (2010). The Theory of Multi-level Governance: Conceptual, Empirical, and Normative Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rhodes, R. A. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Rokkan, S., & Urwin, D. W. (1983). Economy, Territory, Identity: Politics of West European Peripheries. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  63. Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization, 36(2), 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  65. Schneider, V. (2010). Policy Networks and the Governance of Complex Societies. In S. Kramer & P. Ludes (Eds.), Networks of Culture (pp. 27–44). Berlin: Lit-Verlag.Google Scholar
  66. Stepan, A. (1999). Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model. Journal of Democracy, 10(4), 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Töller, A. E. (2012). Warum kooperiert der Staat? Kooperative Umweltpolitik um Schatten der Hierarchie. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tortola, P. D. (2017). Clarifying Multilevel Governance. European Journal of Political Research, 56(2), 234–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Toubeau, S. (2017). Restructuring the State: Mainstream Responses to Regional Nationalism. Publius, 48(1), 76–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. White, G. (2002). Treaty Federalism in Northern Canada: Aboriginal-Government Land Claims Boards. Publius, 32(3), 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nathalie Behnke
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jörg Broschek
    • 2
  • Jared Sonnicksen
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Political ScienceTechnische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations