The Dynamics of Knowledge Governance: Schumpeterian Growth Regimes

  • Cristiano AntonelliEmail author


This chapter elaborates the notion of Schumpeterian growth regimes highlighting the central role of the systemic mechanisms of governance of the interaction and coordination that characterize the generation, use and exploitation of knowledge as the distinctive economic activity that is at the heart of economic systems. It introduces the distinction between entrepreneurial, corporate and knowledge growth regimes according to the institutional differences in the knowledge governance mechanisms.


Knowledge Governance Changing mechanisms for the generation and exploitation of knowledge Schumpeterian growth regimes Entrepreneurial growth regime Corporate growth regime Knowledge growth regimes 


  1. Aglietta, M. (1976). Regulation et crises du capitalism. Paris: Calman-Levy [the quotes are drawn from the English translation: Aglietta, M. (2000). A theory of capitalist regulation: The US experience. New York: Verso.].Google Scholar
  2. Amable, B. (2003). The diversity of modern capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonelli, C. (2015a). The dynamics of knowledge governance. In C. Antonelli & A. Link (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of knowledge (pp. 232–262). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Antonelli, C. (2015b). Towards non-exclusive intellectual property rights. In C. Antonelli & A. Link (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of knowledge. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
  5. Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: What can be done? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2007). The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1242–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2008). Resolving the knowledge paradox: Knowledge-spillover entrepreneurship and economic growth. Research Policy, 37, 1697–1705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Audretsch, D. B., & Link, A. (2019). Sources of knowledge and entrepreneurial behavior. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyer, R. (1988a). Technical change and the theory of ‘regulation’. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 67–94). London and New York: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Boyer, R. (1988b). Formalizing growth regimes. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 608–630). London and New York: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Boyer, R. (2004). Theorie de la regulation. Paris: Editions La Decouverte.Google Scholar
  13. Boyer, R., & Schmeder, G. (1990). Un retour a Adam Smith. Revue Francaise d’Economie, 5, 125–159.Google Scholar
  14. Castellacci, F., & Zheng, J. (2010). Technological regimes: Schumpeterian patterns of innovation and firm-level productivity growth. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(6), 1829–1865.Google Scholar
  15. Chandler, A. D., Jr. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Chandler, A. D., Jr. (1977). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Coriat, B., Petit, P., & Schmeder, J. (Eds.). (2006). The hardship of nations: Exploring the paths of modern capitalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  18. Fagerberg, J., & Sapprasert, K. (2011). National innovation systems: The emergence of a new approach. Science and Public Policy, 38(9), 669–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farber, H. S., Herbst, D., Kuziemko, I., & Suresh, N. (2018). Unions and inequality over the twentieth century: New evidence from survey data (NBER Working Paper 24587).Google Scholar
  20. Frøslev Jens, C., & Maskell, P. (2003). The industrial dynamics of the new digital economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  21. Goldfarb, A., Greenstein, S., & Tucker, C. (2015). Economic analysis of the digital economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greenstein, S., Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2013). Economics of digitization. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, International Library of Critical Writings in Economics series #280.Google Scholar
  23. Hall, P. A., & Gingerich, D. W. (2009). Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the political economy. British Journal of Political Science, 39(3), 449–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jin, D. J., & Stough, R. R. (1998). Learning and learning capability in the Fordist and Post-Fordist age: An integrative framework. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1255–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johansson, B., Karlsson, C., & Stough, R. (2006). The emerging digital economy: Entrepreneurship, clusters, and policy. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kenworthy, L. (2005). Institutional coherence and macroeconomic performance. Socio-Economic Review, 4, 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lazonick, W. (2007). The US stock market and the governance of innovative enterprise. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(6), 983–1035.Google Scholar
  29. Lazonick, W. (2010). The Chandlerian corporation and the theory of innovative enterprise. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(2), 317–349.Google Scholar
  30. Lundvall, B. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1997). Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1), 83–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation system: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Perez, C. (2010). Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Petit, P. (1986). Slow growth and the service economy. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
  37. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
  38. Stiglitz, J. E. (1974). Alternative theories of wage determination and unemployment in LDCs: The labor turnover model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88(2), 194–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vercellone, C. (Ed.). (2003). Sommes-nous sortì du capitalism industriel? Paris: La Dispute.Google Scholar
  40. Vercellone, C. (Ed.). (2006). Capitalismo cognitivo: Conoscenza e finanza nell’epoca postfordista. Roma: Manifestolibri.Google Scholar
  41. Von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Von Hippel, E. (1994). Sticky information and the locus of problem-solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40, 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Von Hippel, E. (1998). Economics of product development by users: The impact of sticky local information. Management Science, 44, 629–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Winter, S. G. (1984). Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 5, 137–158.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento Di Economia E Statistica Cognetti De Martiis, Collegio Carlo AlbertoUniversity of TurinTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations