Advertisement

Meat Quality, Brands and Consumer Trends

  • Alfredo TeixeiraEmail author
  • Sandra Rodrigues
Chapter

Abstract

The complex relation among meat quality, brands and consumer is influenced by many factors, such as the continuous growth of worldwide population, the demand for quality and variety, urbanization, habits and environmental impact of meat chain. At current global level, beef, pork and chicken are largely consumed as main source of animal protein, which also have grown in last decade. Moreover, this scenario also favors the production of meat from less consumed species that are traditionally consumed for either religious and cultural reasons (hunting). Quality has become a major factor, which is perceived by consumers that consider pay more for it. For instance, European legislation has specific laws, regarding meat production, quality label and brands of Protection of Geographical Indications (PGI), Protected Designations of Origin (PDO) and for Guaranteed Traditional Speciality (TSG). However, important issues, such as animal welfare, outbreaks of animal diseases and environmental impact, remains in production of meat. This issues and consumer life style changes are suggested to influence meat industry in a near future.

Keywords

Legislation Life style Hunting PGI PDO TSG Europe Union 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are members of the MARCARNE network, funded by CYTED (ref. 116RT0503).

References

  1. Becker T, Glitsch K, Benner E (1996) Quality policy and consumer behavior. Annual program report. EU FAIR-CT 95–0046. DG 12-SSMAGoogle Scholar
  2. Clemens RLB, Babcock BA (2004) Country of origin as a brand: e case of New Zealand Lamb. MATRIC Brie ng Papers. 5. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/matric_brie ngpapers/5
  3. EC No 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding the labelling of beef and beef products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97Google Scholar
  4. Enneking U (2004) Willingness-to-pay for safety improvements in the german meat sector: the case of the Q&S label. Eur Rev Agric Econ 31(2):205–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. EU No. 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the provision of food information to consumersGoogle Scholar
  6. EU No. 1337/2013 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No. 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the indication of the country of origin or place of provenance for fresh, chilled and frozen meat of swine, sheep, goats and poultryGoogle Scholar
  7. FAOSTAT (2015) [cit. 2017.11.20]. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/CL
  8. FCEC (2009) Feasibility study on animal welfare labelling and establishing a Community Reference Centre for Animal Protection and Welfare. Impact Assessment undertaken for DGSANCO, European Commission. January 2009Google Scholar
  9. Martin F (2003) Building International Brands. Bright 2:7–10Google Scholar
  10. Schröder MJA, McEachern MG (2004) Consumer value conflicts surrounding ethical food purchase decisions: a focus on animal welfare. Int J Consum Stud 28(2):168–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. New Zealand Beef and Lamb Quality Mark Specifications (2015) Processor manual 5th edn, May 2015Google Scholar
  12. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council (2015). Brussels, 20.5.2015 COM(2015) 204 finalGoogle Scholar
  13. Study on the mandatory indication of country of origin or place of provenance of unprocessed foods, single ingredient products and ingredients that represent more than 50% of a food. Final Report, ISBN: 978-92-79-47124-7. https://doi.org/10.2875/415662
  14. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2017) World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/248Google Scholar
  15. WHO (2015) Q&A on the carcinogenicity of the consumption of red meat and processed meatGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mountain Research Center (CIMO), Escola Superior Agrária/Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa ApolóniaBragançaPortugal

Personalised recommendations