Advertisement

ATL Based Refinement of WS-CDL Choreography into BPEL Processes

  • Khadidja Salah MansourEmail author
  • Youcef Hammal
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 64)

Abstract

Web services are often combined together to provide richer features for designing safer and more reliable systems. The composition of services is intended to inter-operate, interact and coordinate multiple services for the achievement of a global goal, or provide new service functions in general. The process for creating such composite services from existing ones is called Web services composition whose description may be achieved through a choreography which globally specifies the interactions between participating services. However, a composition is actually achieved using processes called orchestrators whose actions implement the needed calls to combined services. In this paper, we choose CDL and BPEL as specification languages for choreography and orchestration, respectively. The paper proposes a refinement of CDL choreographies into executable BPEL orchestrations using metamodel-driven translation technique that consists of a set of ATL rules. We propose a solution to transform a given choreography into a set of orchestrations, which exploits CDL and BPEL meta-models. We then propose and implement a set of translation rules using the language ATL, which refines a given CDL specification into a BPEL orchestration processes.

Keywords

Web service composition Meta-model driven Translation Choreography Orchestration ATL WS-CDL WS-BPEL 

References

  1. 1.
    Peltz, C.: Web services orchestration and choreography. IEEE Comput. 36(10), 46–52 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barros, A., Dumas, M., Oaks, P.: A critical overview of the web services choreography description language. Bus. Process Trends White Paper [en ligne] (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ATL: a QVT-like transformation language. In: OOPSLA 2006: Companion to the 21st ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Application (OOPSLA) Portland, Oregon, USA, pp. 719–720. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berardi, D., Calvanese, D., Giacomo, G.D., Lenzerini, M., Mecella, M.: A foundational vision of e-services. In: Bussler, C., Fensel, D., Orlowska, M.E., Yang, J. (eds.) WES. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3095, pp. 28–40. Springer (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benatallah, B., Hacid, M.-S., Rey, C., Toumani, F.: Semantic reasoning for webservices discovery. In: WWW2003 Workshop on E-Services and the Semantic Web, Budapest, Hungary (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paolucci, M., Kawamura, T., Payne, T., Sycara, K.: Importing the semantic web in UDDI. In: Proceedings of E-Services and the Semantic Web Workshop (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paolucci, M., Kawamura, T., Payne, T.R., Sycara, K.P.: Semantic matching of web services capabilities. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J.A. (eds.) Semantic Web Conference. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2342, pp. 333–347. Springer (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aversano, L., Canfora, G., Ciampi, A.: An algorithm for Web service discovery through their composition. In: ICWS 2004 Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2004), p. 332. IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC, USA (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Benatallah, B., Hacid, M.-S., L´eger, A., Rey, C., Toumani, F.: On automating web services discovery. VLDB J. 14(1), 84–96 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bernstein, A., Klein, M.: Discovering services: towards high-precision service retrieval. In: Bussler, C., Hull, R., McIlraith, S.A., Orlowska, M.E., Pernici, B., Yang, J. (eds.) WES. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2512, pp. 260–276. Springer (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cabral, L., Domingue, J.: Mediation of semantic Web services in IRS-III. In: First International Workshop on Mediation in Semantic Web Services (MEDIATE 2005) held in conjunction with the 3rd International Conference on Service Oriented Computing (ICSOC 2005). Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Benatallah B., Dijkman R., Dumas M., Maamar Z.: Service composition: concepts, techniques, tools and trends. In: Stojanovic Z., Dahanayake A. (eds.) Service Oriented Software Engineering: Challenges and Practices, pp. 48–66. Idea Group Inc (IGI) (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wohed, P., van der Aalst, W., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.: Analysis of web services composition languages: the case of BPEL4WS. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, Oct. 2003. LNCS, pp. 200–215. Springer, Chicago, IL, USA (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kavantzas, N., Burdett, D., Ritzinger, G., Fletcher, T., Lafon, Y., Barreto, C.: Web services choreography description language version 1.0. W3C Candidate Recommendation (2005). http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-cdl-10/
  15. 15.
    Workflow Management Coalition (WFMC).: Workflow standard: Workflow process definition interface—xml process definition language (xpdl). Technical report (WFMC-TC 1025), Workflow Management Coalition, Lighthouse Point, Florida, USA (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mendling, J., Hafner, M.: From WS-CDL choreography to BPEL process orchestration. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. (JEIM) 21(5), 525–542 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosenberg, F., Enzi, C., et al.: Integrating quality of service aspects in top-down business process development using WS-CDL and WS-BPEL. In: Eleventh IEEE International EDOC Enterprise Computing Conference, EDOC 2007, October 2007, pp. 15–26. IEEE Computer Society, Annapolis, Maryland, USA (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mendling, J., Hafner, M.: From inter-organizational workflows to process execution: generating BPEL from WS-CDL. In: On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2005: OTM Workshops, pp. 506–515. Springer (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weber, I., Haller, J., et al.: Automated derivation of executable business processes from choreographies in virtual organisations. Int. J. Bus. Process Integr. Manag. 3(2), 85–95 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sendall, S., Kozaczynski, W.: Model translation: the heart and soul of model-driven software development. IEEE Softw. 20, 42–45 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LSI, Department of Computer Science, FEIUSTHB UniversityAlgiersAlgeria

Personalised recommendations