Advertisement

Retracing Protest Publics in Portugal: A Generation in Trouble

  • Cristina Montalvão SarmentoEmail author
  • Patrícia Oliveira
  • Patrícia Tomás
Chapter
Part of the Societies and Political Orders in Transition book series (SOCPOT)

Abstract

In 2008–2010, Portugal and other Southern European markets were hit by the financial crisis. Since then, new forms of political protests emerged in the Portuguese political arena. The pioneering protest, called Geração à RascaGeneration in Trouble—was a demonstration that took place on March 12, 2011, in Lisbon and Porto, the two largest Portuguese cities. This type of protest, here called protest publics, was self-organized outside government structures and mainly organized through social networks, signals the emergence of a crisis of the country’s democratic institutions and generates political change. The aim of this chapter is to analyse these protest publics in Portugal. The inquiry will show how the protests stimulated the emergence of a left coalition that has ruled Portugal since November 2015, the so-called geringonça (contraption, satirical expression of an unusual coalition), marking one of the largest transformations of the political scene since democratization.

Keywords

Portugal Public protest Crisis Generation in Trouble 

References

  1. Baumgarten, B. (2013). Geração à Rasca and Beyond. Mobilizations in Portugal after 12 March 2011. Current Sociology, 61(4), 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope. Social movements in the internet era. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Costa Lobo, M., Ferreira V. S., & Rowland J. (2015). Emprego, Mobilidade, Política e Lazer: Situações e atitudes dos Jovens Portugueses numa Perspectiva Comparada [Employment, mobility, politics and leisure: Situations and attitudes of the young Portuguese in a comparative perspective]. Lisbon: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.Google Scholar
  4. Dalton, R. (2000). The decline of party identification. In R. Dalton & M. Wattenberg (Eds.), Parties without partisans, political change in industrial democracies (pp. 22–23). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dalton, R. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56, 76–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Della Porta, D. (1996). Social movements and the state: Thoughts on the policing of protest. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural frames (pp. 62–92). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Della Porta, D. (2005). Making the polis. Social forums and democracy in the global justice movement. Mobilization, 10(1), 73–94.Google Scholar
  8. Della Porta, D. (2007). The global justice movement: Cross-national and transnational perspectives. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  9. Estanque, E., Costa, H. A., & Soeiro, J. (2013). The new global cycle of protest and the Portuguese case. Journal of Social Science Education, 12(1), 31–40.Google Scholar
  10. Felgueiras, S. (2016). Geração à Rasca. Lisbon: Chiado Editora.Google Scholar
  11. Flinders, M., & Wood, M. (2014). Depoliticisation, governance and the state. Policy & Politics, 42(2), 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freire, A. (2006). Esquerda e Direita na Política Europeia. Portugal, Espanha e Grécia em Perspetiva comparada [Left and right in European politics. Portugal, Spain and Greece in comparative perspective]. Lisbon: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.Google Scholar
  13. Freire, A. (2017). Para lá da “Geringonça” [Beyond the “contraption”]. Lisbon: Edições Contraponto.Google Scholar
  14. Hay, C. (2007). Why we hate politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  15. Inglehart, R. (1990). Cultural shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karamouzi, E., et al. (2013). A strategy for Southern Europe. LSE Special Report. London: LSE.Google Scholar
  18. Katz, R., Mair, P., et al. (1992). The membership of political parties in European democracies 1960–1990. European Journal of Political Research, 22, 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lisi, M. (2011). Os partidos políticos em Portugal: continuidade e transformação [Political parties in Portugal: Continuity and transformation]. Lisbon: Edições Almedina.Google Scholar
  20. Magalhães, P., & Moral, J. S. (2008). Os Jovens e a Política [Youth and politics]. Lisbon: Centro de Sondagens e Estudos de Opinião da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.Google Scholar
  21. Mair, P., & van Biezen, I. (2001). Party membership in twenty European democracies, 1980–2000. Party Politics, 7(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mathieu, L. (2011). La démocratie protestataire. Mouviments sociaux et politiques en France aujord´hui. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  23. Melucci, A. (2001). A Invenção do Presente: Movimentos Sociais nas Sociedades Complexas [The invention of the present: Social movements in complex societies]. Petrópolis: Vozes.Google Scholar
  24. Milbrath, L. (1965). Political participation, how and why do people get involved in politics. Chicago: Rand MacNally.Google Scholar
  25. Pierson, C. (2002). The modern state. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Pinto, A. C., Sousa, L., & Magalhães, P. (2013). A Qualidade da Democracia em Portugal. A visão dos Cidadãos [The quality of democracy in Portugal. The vision of the citizens]. Lisboa: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.Google Scholar
  27. Scarrow, S. (2000). Parties without members? Parties organization in a changing electoral environment. In R. J. Dalton & M. P. Wattenberg (Eds.), Parties without partisans – Political change in advanced industrial democracies (pp. 79–101). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Seyd, P., & Whiteley, P. (2004). British party members: An overview. Party Politics, 10, 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Soeiro, J. (2014). Da Geração à Rasca ao Que se Lixe a Troika. Portugal no novo ciclo internacional de protesto [From generation in trouble to the screw it Troika. Portugal in the new international protest cycle]. Sociologia, 28, 55–79.Google Scholar
  30. Strange, S. (1995). The defective state. Deadalus, 124, 55–75.Google Scholar
  31. Tarrow, S. (1995). Cycles of collective action: Between moments of madness and the repertoire of contention. In M. Traugott (Ed.), Repertoires and cycles of collective action (pp. 89–116). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Teixeira, C. P. (2011). Relação entre cidadãos e partidos no Portugal democrático: um balanço [Relationship between citizens and parties in democratic Portugal: A balance]. In A. Freire (Ed.), Eleições e Sistemas Eleitorais no Século XX Português: Uma Perspectiva Histórica e Comparativa. Edições Colibri: Lisbon.Google Scholar
  33. Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution reading. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  34. Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Webb, P., Farrell, D., & Holliday, I. (2002). Political parties in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristina Montalvão Sarmento
    • 1
    Email author
  • Patrícia Oliveira
    • 1
  • Patrícia Tomás
    • 1
  1. 1.Political Observatory and Portuguese Journal of Political Science (PJPS), Institute of Social and Political SciencesUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations