Advertisement

Documentation and Radiology

  • Christian HeroldEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Photographic documentation serves not only for process inspection but is especially of great importance for a medicolegal enquiry. It is important that a standard technique is used, which is applicable both before the operation and also after the intervention in the same manner. In addition, using 3D scanners, a virtual three-dimensional imaging of body regions can be created. A simulation of the effect to be expected for a breast augmentation is thus possible. Postoperative imaging covers especially mammography, ultrasound, and MRI. Normal changes can be best confirmed using ultrasound, after autologous fat tissue transplantation, by which one can identify oval hypo-echogeneous, small-walled changes, which look like oil cysts. MRI, on the other hand, is the most sensitive technique, in order to detect fat tissue necrosis and to differentiate it from oil cysts or a malignancy.

References

  1. 1.
    Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, et al. Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54(5):471–6; discussion 477–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, et al. New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57(6):602–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, et al. Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. Breast. 2007;16(2):137–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kovacs L, Yassouridis A, Zimmermann A, et al. Optimization of 3-dimensional imaging of the breast region with 3-dimensional laser scanners. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56(3):229–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eder M, Kovacs L. [Commentary on the article of Herold et al.: the use of mamma MRI volumetry to evaluate the rates of fat survival after autologous lipotransfer]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2010;42(2):135–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koban KC, Leitsch S, Holzbach T, et al. [3D-imaging and analysis for plastic surgery by smartphone and tablet, an alternative to professional systems?]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2014;46:97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Costantini M, Cipriani A, Belli P, et al. Radiological findings in mammary autologous fat injections: a multi-technique evaluation. Clin Radiol. 2013;68:27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rubin JP, Coon D, Zuley M, et al. Mammographic changes after fat transfer to the breast compared with changes after breast reduction: a blinded study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:1029–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fiaschetti V, Pistolese CA, Fornari M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound evaluation after breast autologous fat grafting combined with platelet-rich plasma. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:498e–509e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parikh RP, Doren EL, Mooney B, et al. Differentiating fat necrosis from recurrent malignancy in fat-grafted breasts: an imaging classification system to guide management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:761–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ueberreiter K. BEAULI™: a new method for the simple and reliable fatty cell transplantation. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2010;42:379–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DIAKO Bremen, Plastische und Ästhetische ChirurgieBremenGermany
  2. 2.Plastische Chirurgie und Handchirurgie im MühlenviertelBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations