Advertisement

Mobile Charging of Wireless Sensor Networks for Internet of Things: A Multi-Attribute Decision Making Approach

  • Abhinav TomarEmail author
  • Prasanta Kumar Jana
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11319)

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) has become an emerging and booming area of interest among the researchers and academia people. There is a rich set of IoT applications that include environment monitoring, e-healthcare, industry automation, and so on. Wireless sensor network (WSN) is a predominant alternative to make IoT more realistic as it connects physical devices to the Internet through a gateway. For real-time IoT applications, WSN with an ability to maintain energy efficient communication among sensor nodes for fast service delivery to the users is of utmost importance. However, the energy-limited battery remarkably limits the longer operability of nodes which hinders the continuous flow of sensory data to the Internet. In this regard, energy replenishment of energy-hungry nodes through wireless mobile chargers (MCs) is a promising alternative to alleviate the limited energy problem in the WSNs. To this end, we propose a multi-attribute decision making scheme that incorporates different network attributes (NAs), namely residual energy, distance to MC, neighborhood criticality, and charging significance. First, we determine the relative weights of different NAs by employing the entropy weight method (EWM). Next, the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is applied for ranking the nodes in order to determine their charging schedule. Rigorous simulations are carried out to facilitate the quantitative evaluation of the proposed scheme. The comparison results reveal that our scheme outperforms the relevant state-of-the-art methods with respect to charging latency, number of dead nodes, and charging efficiency.

Keywords

Internet of Things Wireless sensor networks Mobile charging Charging schedule 

References

  1. 1.
    Benitez, J.M., Martín, J.C., Román, C.: Using fuzzy number for measuring quality of service in the hotel industry. Tour. Manag. 28(2), 544–555 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Feng, W., Alshaer, H., Elmirghani, J.M.: Optimization of energy consumption in rectangular ad-hoc wireless networks. In: Fourth International Conference on Communications and Networking in China, ChinaCOM 2009, pp. 1–5. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    He, L., Gu, Y., Pan, J., Zhu, T.: On-demand charging in wireless sensor networks: theories and applications. In: 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems, pp. 28–36. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    He, L., Kong, L., Gu, Y., Pan, J., Zhu, T.: Evaluating the on-demand mobile charging in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 14(9), 1861–1875 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    He, L., Zhuang, Y., Pan, J., Xu, J.: Evaluating on-demand data collection with mobile elements in wireless sensor networks. In: 2010 IEEE 72nd Vehicular Technology Conference Fall, VTC 2010-Fall, pp. 1–5. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Methods for multiple attribute decision making. Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 186, pp. 58–191. Springer, Heidelberg (1981).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaswan, A., Tomar, A., Jana, P.K.: An efficient scheduling scheme for mobile charger in on-demand wireless rechargeable sensor networks. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 114, 123–134 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin, C., Wang, Z., Han, D., Wu, Y., Yu, C.W., Wu, G.: TADP: enabling temporal and distantial priority scheduling for on-demand charging architecture in wireless rechargeable sensor networks. J. Syst. Archit. 70, 26–38 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lu, L., Yuan, Y.: A novel topsis evaluation scheme for cloud service trustworthiness combining objective and subjective aspects. J. Syst. Softw. 143, 71–86 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patwari, N., Hero, A.O., Perkins, M., Correal, N.S., O’dea, R.J.: Relative location estimation in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Sig. Process. 51(8), 2137–2148 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prakash, C., Barua, M.: Integration of AHP-TOPSIS method for prioritizing the solutions of reverse logistics adoption to overcome its barriers under fuzzy environment. J. Manuf. Syst. 37, 599–615 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ren, X., Liang, W., Xu, W.: Quality-aware target coverage in energy harvesting sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. 3(1), 8–21 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shanian, A., Savadogo, O.: A methodological concept for material selection of highly sensitive components based on multiple criteria decision analysis. Expert. Syst. Appl. 36(2), 1362–1370 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W., Burks, A.W.: The mathematical theory of communication (1951)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tomar, A., Anwit, R., Jana, P.K.: An efficient scheme for on-demand energy replenishment in wireless rechargeable sensor networks. In: 2017 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), pp. 125–130. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tomar, A., Nitesh, K., Jana, P.K.: An efficient scheme for trajectory design of mobile chargers in wireless sensor networks. Wirel. Netw. 1–16 (2018)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tong, B., Li, Z., Wang, G., Zhang, W.: How wireless power charging technology affects sensor network deployment and routing. In: 2010 IEEE 30th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), pp. 438–447. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang, T.C., Chang, T.H.: Application of topsis in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment. Expert Syst. Appl. 33(4), 870–880 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xie, L., Shi, Y., Hou, Y.T., Lou, W., Sherali, H.D., Midkiff, S.F.: Bundling mobile base station and wireless energy transfer: modeling and optimization. In: 2013 Proceedings IEEE of INFOCOM, pp. 1636–1644. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xie, L., Shi, Y., Hou, Y.T., Lou, W., Sherali, H.D., Midkiff, S.F.: Multi-node wireless energy charging in sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. (ToN) 23(2), 437–450 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xie, L., Shi, Y., Hou, Y.T., Sherali, H.D.: Making sensor networks immortal: an energy-renewal approach with wireless power transfer. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. (TON) 20(6), 1748–1761 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines) DhanbadDhanbadIndia

Personalised recommendations