Advertisement

An Exploration of the Effects of Managerial Intervention on Engineering Design Team Performance

  • Joshua T. Gyory
  • Jonathan CaganEmail author
  • Kenneth Kotovsky
Conference paper

Abstract

Engineering is often done in teams, but teams are not always efficient and maximally proficient. This work explores whether a portion of the resources used for solving a problem could instead be used to manage and control the design process of the remainder of a team. Consequently, this research begins to investigate whether a manager can improve the collective performance of engineering design teams.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) under grant No. FA9550-16-1-0049 and grant No. FA9550-18-1-0088. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.

References

  1. 1.
    Laughlin PR (2011) Group problem solving. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoffman LR (1966) Group problem solving. In: Advances in experimental social psychology, pp 99–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Littlepage G, Robison W, Reddington K (1997) Effects of task experience and group experience on group performance, member ability, and recognition of expertise. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 69(2):133–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim MS (2007) Analysis of team interaction and team creativity of student design teams based on personal creativity modes. In: Proceeding of ASME 2007 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ven A, Van De, Delbeco AL (2017) Nominal versus interacting group processes for committee decision-making effectiveness 14(2):203–212Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tesluk PE, Quigley NR, Tekleab AG (2009) A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectivenss. Gr Organ Manage 34(2):170–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Turkalj Z, Fosic I, Dujak D (2008) Conflict management in organization. Interdiscip Manag (917340826)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Isaksen SG (2013) Facilitating creative problem-solving groups [Online]. Available: http://www.cpsb.com/research/articles/creative-problem-solving/Facilitating-CPS-Groups.html
  9. 9.
    Treffinger DJ, Isaksen SG (2009) Creative problem solving: the history, development, and implications for gifted education and talent development. Gift Child Q 49(4):342–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McComb C, Cagan J, Kotovsky K (2015) Lifting the veil: drawing insights about design teams from a cognitively-inspired computational model. Des Stud 40:119–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McComb C, Cagan J, Kotovsky K (2015) Rolling with the punches: an examination of team performance in a design task subject to drastic changes. Des Stud 36(C):99–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fu K, Cagan J, Kotovsky K (2010) Design team convergence: the influence of example solution quality. J Mech Des 132(11):111005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Linsey JS, Markman AB, Wood KL (2012) Design by analogy: a study of the wordtree method for problem re-representation. J Mech Des 134(4):041009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jansson DG, Smith SM (1991) Design fixation. Des Stud 12(1):3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sio UN, Kotovsky K, Cagan J (2015) Fixation or inspiration? A meta-analytic review of the role of examples on design processes. Des Stud 39:70–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Linsey JS, Tseng I, Fu K, Cagan J, Wood KL, Schunn C (2010) A study of design fixation, its mitigation and perception in engineering design faculty. J Mech Des 132(4):41003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hey J, Linsey J, Agogino aM, Wood KL (2008) Analogies and metaphors in creative design. Int J Eng Educ 24(2):283–294Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shah JJ, Smith SM, Vargas-Hernandez N (2003) Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Des Stud 24(2):111–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dong A, Hill AW, Agogino AM (2004) A document analysis method for characterizing design team performance. J Mech Des 126(3):378CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joshua T. Gyory
    • 1
  • Jonathan Cagan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kenneth Kotovsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Carnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations