Advertisement

Vitamin E and Healthcare Costs: Models to Assess the Impact

  • Mark NuijtenEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Nutrition and Health book series (NH)

Abstract

The health economic evidence of vitamins tends to be limited. An important reason is that vitamins do not fall always under the coverage requirements for reimbursement, like for pharmaceuticals, which often require health economic data. The objective of this chapter is to describe the applications of health economic theories and models of vitamin E to obtain a better understanding of the possible impact of this essential micronutrient on healthcare costs.

An initial question is if vitamin E can be considered a pharmaceutical product or a nutritional intervention. Subsequently we explore the introduction of vitamin E in the consumer market and the medical market. After a general introduction into health economics, the main concept of the cost per QALY gained is applied to vitamin E, which reduces the risk for cardiovascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with Hp 2-2 genotype.

The analysis shows that the use of vitamin E in all type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, irrespective of Hp genotype, leads to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £ 684 per QALY gained compared with no vitamin E. When vitamin E is only used in diabetes mellitus patients following a positive diagnostic test for Hp 2-2 genotype, the ICER falls to only £ 41 per QALY gained. This application shows that concepts of health economics can be applied to vitamin E, and the results show that vitamin E is extremely cost-effective.

Keywords

Health economics Vitamins Nutrients Cost-effectiveness Market access Reimbursement Model Costs Stratified medicine 

References

  1. 1.
    Hutton J. Health economics’ and the evolution of economic evaluation of health technologies. Health Econ. 2012;21:13–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Howard BV, Magee MF. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2000;2:476–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aronson D, Rayfield EJ. Diabetes. In: Topol EJ, editor. Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. p. 171–94.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guide to the single technology appraisal (STA) process. 2010. www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/howwework/devnicetech/developing_nice_single_technology_appraisals.jsp?domedia=1&mid=912F667C-19B9-E0B5-D43AD56E114A62D9 24/09/2010. Accessed 4 Oct 2010.
  5. 5.
    Gillett M, Brennan A, Watson P, Khunti K, Davies M, Mostafa S, Gray LJ. The cost-effectiveness of testing strategies for type 2 diabetes: a modelling study. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(33):1–80.  https://doi.org/10.3310/hta19330.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farbstein D, Levy AP. The genetics of vascular complications in diabetes mellitus. Cardiol Clin. 2010;28(3):477–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccl.2010.04.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Preis SR, Hwang SJ, Coady S, Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB Sr, Savage PJ, Levy D, Fox CS. Trends in all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality among women and men with and without diabetes mellitus in the Framingham Heart Study, 1950 to 2005. Circulation. 2009;119:1728–35. [PubMed: 19307472]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Franco OH, Steyerberg EW, Hu FB, Mackenbach J, Nusselder W. Associations of diabetes mellitus with total life expectancy and life expectancy with and without cardiovascular disease. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1145–51. [PubMed: 17563022]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hammoud T, Tanguay JF, Bourassa MG. Management of coronary artery disease: therapeutic options in patients with diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:355–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2007. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:596–615. [PubMed: 18308683].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Narayan KMV, Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Sorensen SW, Williamson DF. Lifetime risk for diabetes mellitus in the United States. JAMA. 2003;290:1884–90. [PubMed: 14532317].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M. Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:229–34. [PubMed: 9673301].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boyle JP, Honeycutt AA, Narayan KMV, Hoerger TJ, Geiss LS, Chen H, et al. Projection of diabetes burden through 2050: impact of changing demography and disease prevalence in the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1936–40. [PubMed: 11679460].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH. Global burden of diabetes, 1995–2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1414–31. [PubMed: 9727886].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nuijten MJ, Dubois DJ. Cost-utility analysis: current methodological issues and future perspectives. Front Pharmacol. 2011;2:29.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2011.00029. eCollection 2011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blum S, Vardi M, Brown JB, Russell A, Milman U, Shapira C, Levy NS, Miller-Lotan R, Asleh R, Levy AP. Vitamin E reduces cardiovascular disease in individuals with diabetes mellitus and the haptoglobin 2-2 genotype. Pharmacogenomics. 2010;11(5):675–84.  https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs.10.17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lamotte M, Annemans L, Kawalec P, Zoellner Y. A multi-country health economic evaluation of highly concentrated N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction. PharmacoEconomics. 2006;24(8):783–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.A2M – MinervaAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsITUIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations