Exploring Potential of Traditionally Crafted Textiles to Transform into e-Wearables for Use in Socio-cultural Space

  • Pradeep Yammiyavar
  • DeepshikhaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 544)


With digital wearables becoming a popular trend, this paper explores understanding user behavior and acceptance of e-textile prior to designing a textile wearable that has roots in Indian culture. The potential of traditional textile designs to become part of the emerging e-textile wearable scenario is crucial in order to preserve design traditions and also to prevent redundancy of crafts skills due to advancement of technology. In order to explore attitudes and acceptance of embedding traditional design elements by the younger generation of e-wearable adopters, a study was conducted in India, wherein prototypes were tested for their potential and acceptance of becoming interactive communication aids in the social space. A hand-embellished scarf with micro RGB LEDs named as Aster, has been prototyped with traditional motifs local to India so as to gather response for the capacity of e-textiles to aid non-verbal communication. The perception of respondents towards acceptance of Aster based on Technology Acceptance Model was analyzed. Thirty users took part in the preliminary study to understand user behavior and sixty users took part in the subsequent study pertaining to assessment of the digital wearable scarf. The analysis of responses reveal high acceptance towards textile wearables for daily interactions and improved self-expression. Usability assessment indicates positive experience of users while using Aster for daily interactions in specific social contexts. The inferences drawn from the study are encouraging and indicate optimism for inclusion of traditional craft design elements in digital textile wearables. The results provide optimism for craft makers to expand their traditional skills towards embedding electronic components thereby ensuring relevancy of traditionally skilled work without having to face work redundancy due to technology advancement.


Wearable Non-verbal expression Acceptance Usability Behavior 



Participants who took part in the user studies. Research scholars at the Usability Engineering and Human Computer Interaction Lab, Department of Design, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, Assam, India.

Supplementary material


  1. 1.
    Veenu, K.C., Sharma, R.B.: Symbolic motifs in traditional Indian textiles and embroideries. Int. J. Res. Econ. Soc. Sci. 6(3), 311–321 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hartman, K.: Make-wearable electronics-design, prototype, and wear your own interactive garments. MakerMedia Inc., Sebastopol (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dolan, A., Holloway, S.: Emotional textiles-an introduction. Textile 14(2), 152–159 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holloway, S.: Textiles in Emotions in Early Modern Europe-An Introduction, edited by S. Routledge, Broomhall (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moody, W., Kinderman, P., Shinha, P., Sook You, K.: An exploratory study: relationships between trying on clothing, mood, emotion, personality and clothing preference. J. Fash. Market. Manage. Int. J. 14(1), 161–179 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heather, C.L., Kathleen, E.D., Logan, A.B.: Functional perspectives on emotion, behavior, and cognition. Behav. Sci. J. 3, 536–540 (2013). Scholar
  7. 7.
    David, M.G.L., Daniel, C.B., Laith, A.S., Annia, R., Todd, D., David, M.B.: Friends with benefits-the evolved psychology of same- and opposite-sex friendship. Evol. Psychol. 9(4), 543-563 (2011). Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goleman, D.: Social Intelligence- The New Science of Human Relationships. Bantam Books, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. Manage. Inf. Syst. Res. Center 13(3, 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Quesenbery, W: Balancing the 5Es: usability. Cutter IT J. 17(2), 4 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yammiyavar, P.: Usability heuristics and their role in designing vehicles - a case study of an electric - hybrid vehicle body design. J. Indian Inst. Sci. 85, 67–82 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Plutchik R.: The nature of emotions. Am. Sci. 89, 344–350 (1989). eofemotions%202001.pdf 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baites C. Philips bubelle dress (2007). Accessed 7 Feb 2018
  15. 15.
    Cutecircuit-Galaxy dress (2009).
  16. 16.
    Nemo Dress-Irenebrenation. Atelier LeonLeon’s Smart Tech-Couture (2012).
  17. 17.
    Deepika Singhania-Gaurav Gupta IBM Saree Gown (2017).
  18. 18.
    Pankaj and Nidhi-Geometrica (2012).
  19. 19.
    The Johari Window Model: The Johari Window Model in Communication models, Group communication. Accessed 9 June 2018
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Note on handloom sector – Ministry of Textiles, Government of India (2015).

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of DesignIndian Institute of TechnologyGuwahatiIndia

Personalised recommendations