Advertisement

Prologue: The Good Life, Asceticism and Sustainable Cycling

  • Ron Welters
Chapter
Part of the Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy book series (LOET, volume 37)

Abstract

What is the good life? Or: how are we to live? Since ancient times the answer to this question usually is that we must work on ourselves and improve ourselves by way of training. This practical and practiced philosophical investigation will focus on one particular dimension of this striving for human perfection by means of ‘asceticism’ (a derivative from the ancient Greek askēsis, meaning exercise or training): endurance sports, such as long distance running, cycling and triathlon. These are all sports that flourish by dedicated training rather than sheer motor talent, which makes them not only accessible but also increasingly popular among the crowd.

Especially the phenomenon of cycling has brought endurance sport within reach of the masses. Almost everyone can ride and afford a bicycle, a high tech artefact, which according to Ivan Illich “outstrips the efficiency of not only all machines but all other animals as well” (Energy & equity. Harper & Collins, New York, 1974, p. 60). This energetic economy makes the bicycle a straightforward tool for a more sustainable lifestyle. But the stakes of a life that is to be fully lived in endurance are higher. How can endurance sport at large and cycling in particular contribute not only to self-knowledge, but also to self-improvement and to sustainability?

Because of its competitiveness and agonistic characteristic—at first sight the very opposite of peaceful sustainable coexistence—sport usually has a negative connotation in environmental philosophy or ‘ecosophy’ (a contraction of ecology and philosophy), a term coined by Arne Naess in the seventies and applied to sport by Sigmund Loland in the nineties. Inspired by Loland’s attempt to sketch an ecosophy of sport, and strengthened by Peter Sloterdijk’s analysis of man as an upwardly oriented training animal, set forth in You must Change your Life: On Anthropotechnics (2009/2013), as well as insights from historical phenomenology (or ‘metabletics’), hermeneutics and pragmatism, I will argue for a vertically challenged life in what William James has called ‘the strenuous mood’: serious and hard pushing, instead of pedalling around just a little. This results in an upwardly oriented ecosophical life, leading to qualitative growth, human flourishing, durability and a change for the better. Agonistic sport and environmental sensitivity: the twain shall not only meet but merge into a strenuous consequential truth.

Keywords

Asceticism Cycling Ecosophy Human flourishing 

References

  1. Aggerholm, K. 2016. On practising in sport: Towards an ascetological understanding of sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 43 (3): 350–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Devine, J.W., and C.J. Knight. 2017. Beyond ‘crude pragmatism’ in sports coaching; Insights from C.S. Pierce, William James, and John Dewey, A commentary. International Journal of Sport Science and Coaching 12 (1): 35–37.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954116684405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Drabinski, J. 1993. Radical empiricism and phenomenology: Philosophy and the pure stuff of experience. Journal of Special Philosophy, New Series 7 (3): 226–242.Google Scholar
  4. Fusche Moe, V. 2014. The philosophy of sport and continental philosophy. In The Bloomsbury companion to the philosophy of sport, ed. C. Torres, 52–65. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  5. Giesen, P. 2011, April. Peter Sloterdijk, Duitse filosoof: Naar de sportschool om de planeet te redden. De Volkskrant 30 (2011): 7–8.Google Scholar
  6. Gorichanaz, T. 2016. Beautiful and sublime: The aesthetics of running in a commodified world. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 43 (3): 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gorris, L., and Kurbjuweit, D. 2008. Philosopher Peter Sloterdijk on the Tour de France: “The Riders are Just Regular Employees.” Der Spiegel Online International. http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/philosopher-peter-sloterdijk-on-the-tour-de-france-the-riders-are-just-regular-employees-a-565111.html. Accessed 9 September 2017.
  8. Heidegger, M. 1927/2008. Being and time. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  9. Hochstetler, D., and P. Hopsicker. 2012. The heights of humanity: Endurance sport and the strenuous mood. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 39 (1): 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 2016. Normative concerns for endurance athletes. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 43 (3): 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Illich, I. 1974. Energy & equity. New York: Harper & Collins.Google Scholar
  12. Ilundáin-Agurruza, J. 2014. José Ortega y Gasset: Exuberant steed. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 8 (3): 285–314.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2014.981361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. James, W. 1907. The energies of man. The American Magazine (reprint).Google Scholar
  14. ———. 1976. The works of William James: Essays in radical empirism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Krabbé, T. 1978/2016. The rider. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  16. Landeweerd, L. 2016. Das verborgene Leben der Dinge/The hidden life of things. Unpublished lecture/Artistic Object.Google Scholar
  17. Lemmens, P. 2008. Gedreven door techniek. De menselijke conditie en de biotechnologische revolutie (Driven by technology. The human condition and the biotechnology revolution). Oisterwijk: Box Press.Google Scholar
  18. Loland, S. 1995. Coubertin’s ideology of Olympism from the perspective of the history of ideas. Olympika: International Journal of Olympic Studies 4: 49–77.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 1996. Outline of an ecosophy of sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 23: 70–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ———. 2001. Record Sports: An ecological critique and a reconstruction. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 28: 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ———. 2006. Olympic sport and the ideal of sustainable development. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 33: 144–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lopez Frias, J., and A. Edgar. 2016. Sport and hermeneutics. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 10 (4): 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meinberg, E. 1991. Die Moral im Sport, Bausteine einer neuen Sportethik. Aachen: Meyer & Meyer.Google Scholar
  24. Meyr, K. 2016. Isklar Norseman extreme triathlon: Results 2016. https://nxtri.com/wet-wet-cold/. Accessed 5 February 2018.
  25. Okrent, M. 1988. Heidegger’s pragmatism. Understanding, being, and the critique of metaphysics. Ithaka: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ortega y Gasset, J. 1932/1993. The revolt of the masses. New York/London: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 1941/2002. The sportive origin of the state. In Toward a philosophy of history, ed. J. Ortega y Gasset. Urbana/Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  28. Pollock, A. 1995. Pragmatism and hermeneutics: Rorty, James and Gadamer on truth. Ottawa: University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
  29. Shakespeare, W. 1983. The complete works of William Shakespeare. London: Henry Pordes.Google Scholar
  30. Singer, M., and J. Lalich. 1996. Crazy therapies. What are they? Do they work? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  31. Sloterdijk, P. 2005. Sphären: Eine Trilogie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  32. Sloterdijk 2009/2013. You must change your life: On anthropotechnics. Cambridge: Malden.Google Scholar
  33. Suits, B. 1978/2005. The grasshopper: Games, life and utopia. Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
  34. ———. 1988. Tricky triad: Games, play, and sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 15: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tuncel, Y. 2013. Agon in Nietzsche. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Van den Berg, J.-H. 1973. De reflex: Metabletische tegelijk maatschappijkritische studie. Nijkerk: Calllenbach.Google Scholar
  37. Van den Bossche, M. 1995. Kritiek van de technische rede. Een onderzoek naar de invloed van techniek op ons denken. Utrecht: Jan van Arkel.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 2001. Ironie en solidariteit. Een kennismaking met het werk van Richard Rorty. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2010. Sport als levenskunst. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.Google Scholar
  40. Van der Hout, S. 2014. The homeotechnical turn: Sloterdijk’s response to the ecological crisis. Environmental Values 23: 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Welters, R. 2011. Van Eyserbosweg naar Eyserbosweg: Fietsfilosofische plaatservaringen. In Filosofische beschouwingen over plaats: Verbondenheid met natuur en landschap, ed. R. Van den Born, M. Drenthen, P. Lemmens, and T. Van Slobbe, 51–70. Zeist: KNNV.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 2014. Sport and the environment: Ecosophical and metanoetical intersections. In The Bloomsbury companion to the philosophy of sport, ed. C. Torres, 163–179. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  43. ———. 2016. On ascetic practices and hermeneutical cycles. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 10 (4): 430–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zwart, H. 2016. What comes next? The operator theory as an operationalisation of the Teilhardian view on cosmogenesis. In Evolution and transitions in complexity, ed. G.A.J.M. Jagers op Akkerhuis, 253–267. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ron Welters
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Science in Society, Faculty of ScienceRadboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations