Container Handling in the Yard Area

  • Filip Covic
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)


All types of container handling operations in yard blocks are identified. Their properties are evaluated in order to enable a classification of handling operations. In this sense, it is distinguished between handover handling and re-handling operations. Based on the handling types, self-contained planning problems for container handling in yard blocks are formally defined. First, a general taxonomy for the problem types is purposed. Afterwards, individual problems are stated and classified according to the proposed scheme. The main properties of each problem in terms of yard block layout and yard crane system among others are evaluated and contrasted with the other handling problems for the purpose of comparison. In the end, the problem scope of this work is formulated as the result of this chapter.


  1. Bernhofen DM, El-Sahil Z, Kneller R (2016) Estimating the effects of the container revolution on world trade. J Int Econ 98: 36–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berx N (2007) Efficient stacking on container terminals: how to cope with volume fluctuations on a densely stacked terminal, while maintaining terminal performance. Port Technol Int 35: 53–54Google Scholar
  3. Bortfeldt A, Forster F (2012) A tree search procedure for the container pre-marshalling problem. Eur J Oper Res 217 (3): 531–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlo HJ, Vis IFA, Roodbergen KJ (2014) Storage yard operations in container terminals: literature overview, trends, and research directions. Eur J Oper Res 235 (2): 412–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caserta M, Schwarze S, Voß S (2012) A mathematical formulation and complexity considerations for the blocks relocation problem. Eur J Oper Res 219 (1): 96–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Covic F (2017) Re-marshalling in automated container yards with terminal appointment systems. Flex Serv Manuf J 29 (3–4): 433–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dekker R, Voogd P, van Asperen E (2007) Advanced methods for container stacking. In: Kim KH, Günther, HO (eds) Container terminals and cargo systems. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 131–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kang J, Oh MS, Ahn EY, Ryu KR, Kim KH (2006) Planning for intra-block remarshalling in a container terminal. In: Ali M, Dapoigny R (eds) Advances in applied artificial intelligence, IEA/AIE 2006. Volume 4031 of lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 1211–1220Google Scholar
  9. Lee Y, Hsu NY (2007) An optimization model for the container pre-marshalling problem. Comput Oper Res 34 (11): 3295–3313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Levinson M (2006) The box: how the shipping container made the world smaller and the world economy bigger, 1st edn. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  11. Ries J, González-Ramírez RG, Miranda P (2014) A fuzzy logic model for the container stacking problem at container terminals. In: González-Ramírez RG, Schulte F, Voß S, Ceroni Díaz JA (eds) Computational logisitcs, ICCL 2014. Volume 8760 of lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Cham, pp 93–111Google Scholar
  12. Saurí S, Martín E (2011) Space allocating strategies for improving import yard performance at marine terminals. Transp Res E Log Transp Rev 47 (6): 1038–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sharif O, Huynh N (2013) Storage space allocation at marine container terminals using ant-based control. Expert Syst Appl 40 (6): 2323–2330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tang L, Jiang W, Liu J, Dong Y (2015) Research into container reshuffling and stacking problems in container terminal yards. IIE Trans 47 (7): 751–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhang C, Liu J, Wan Y, Murty KG, Linn RL (2003) Storage space allocation in container terminals. Transp Res B: Methodol 37 (10): 883–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhen L (2014) Storage allocation in transshipment hubs under uncertainties. Int J Prod Res 52 (1): 72–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Filip Covic
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Operations Research, HBS Hamburg Business SchoolUniversity of HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations